IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/emsd88/v13y2024i2p20-42.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Incorporation of the Sustainable Development Goals into Fashion Companies in South Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Jessica Alves da Motta
  • Ricardo Ribeiro Alves
  • Joao Garibaldi Almeida Viana
  • Andressa Hennig Silva
  • Ana Julia Teixeira Senna Sarmento Barata

Abstract

This article checks the performance of the fashion companies in South Brazil relative to the incorporation of actions within the framework of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The study adopts a quantitative approach of descriptive character, based on the Survey Method, applied to companies in one of the main fashion producing regions in Brazil. It was possible to ensure that the best performance of companies was achieved in gender equality and decent work and economic growth, with good and excellent performance, respectively. However, the performance of the companies in consumption and responsible production (SDG 12) and fight against climate change (SDG 13) were classified within the poor performance category. What demonstrates that the companies act unevenly in the different SDGs surveyed. Therefore, it is necessary to create a more global view of actions to compensate for their weaknesses, and as a consequence improve their sustainability. The negative performance is worrying because changes in production systems are urgent as pollution levels have increased on the planet. This study contributes with a data collection instrument that can be replicated in other fashion companies in different social, economic and cultural contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jessica Alves da Motta & Ricardo Ribeiro Alves & Joao Garibaldi Almeida Viana & Andressa Hennig Silva & Ana Julia Teixeira Senna Sarmento Barata, 2024. "The Incorporation of the Sustainable Development Goals into Fashion Companies in South Brazil," Environmental Management and Sustainable Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 13(2), pages 20-42, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:20-42
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/download/21920/17051
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd/article/view/21920
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aleksandar Subic & Bahman Shabani & Mehdi Hedayati & Enda Crossin, 2012. "Capability Framework for Sustainable Manufacturing of Sports Apparel and Footwear," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-19, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fung, Yi-Ning & Chan, Hau-Ling & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Liu, Rong, 2021. "Sustainable product development processes in fashion: Supply chains structures and classifications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    2. Bin Shen, 2014. "Sustainable Fashion Supply Chain: Lessons from H&M," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-14, September.
    3. Luo Wang & Bin Shen, 2017. "A Product Line Analysis for Eco-Designed Fashion Products: Evidence from an Outdoor Sportswear Brand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Christoph Pott & Christian Spiekermann & Christoph Breuer & Michael ten Hompel, 2024. "Managing logistics in sport: a comprehensive systematic literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 2341-2400, December.
    5. Taerin Chung & Kwang-Yong Lee & Uk Kim, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainable Management Strategies of Sports Apparel Brands on Brand Reliability and Purchase Intention through Single Person Media during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Path Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-12, June.
    6. Aleksandar Subic & Bahman Shabani & Mehdi Hedayati & Enda Crossin, 2013. "Performance Analysis of the Capability Assessment Tool for Sustainable Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(8), pages 1-19, August.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:emsd88:v:13:y:2024:i:2:p:20-42. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/emsd .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.