IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/bmsmti/v14y2023i2p85-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Performance of Corporate Value in Different Periods

Author

Listed:
  • Chengzhuo Zhang
  • Nik Hadiyan Binti Nik Azman

Abstract

The prevalence of COVID-19 offers companies the opportunity to adopt a more realistic approach to corporate social responsibility. This study examines the performance of ESG and corporate value under the COVID-19 scenario using panel data from 2018 to 2021. After collecting data from the Wind database, regression analysis was used to analyses the total ESG score, specific indicator scores and companies with various ratings. This study showed that sustainability - whether environmental (E), social (S) or governance (G) - contributes to enterprise value. It contributed to an increase in enterprise value for companies with high ratings, but had little impact on the enterprise value of companies with low ratings. In addition, the study was divided into two groups based on the duration of the pandemic to determine whether sustainability and firm value behaved differently under the influence of COVID-19. Even in the presence of COVID-19, the study found that the impact of sustainability on firm value was still favorable and significant. This study provides a detailed breakdown of ESG scores and regression analysis of individual indicators. Secondly a more detailed classification of companies was also carried out, with the study looking at companies according to different ratings, including AAA, AA, A, BBB, BB, B, CCC, CC, C.

Suggested Citation

  • Chengzhuo Zhang & Nik Hadiyan Binti Nik Azman, 2023. "Environmental Social and Governance (ESG) Performance of Corporate Value in Different Periods," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 14(2), pages 85-108, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:85-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/download/21233/16488
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms/article/view/21233
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khan, Sidra, 2022. "Effects of Green Human Resource Management practices on environmental performance: Evidence from Textile Sector of Emerging Country," MPRA Paper 112379, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Taiyuan Wang & Pratima Bansal, 2012. "Social responsibility in new ventures: profiting from a long‐term orientation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(10), pages 1135-1153, October.
    3. Ho-Tan-Phat Phan & Francesco De Luca & Lea Iaia, 2020. "The “Walk” towards the UN Sustainable Development Goals: Does Mandated “Talk” through NonFinancial Disclosure Affect Companies’ Financial Performance?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    5. Amer Ait Sidhoum & Teresa Serra, 2018. "Corporate Sustainable Development. Revisiting the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 365-378, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Han, Liyan & Xie, Chen & Jin, Jiayu & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Effect of low-carbon innovation on carbon risk: International firm-level investigation," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    2. Valentina Marano & Steve Sauerwald & Marc Essen, 2022. "The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1315-1342, September.
    3. Lingling Cao & Hong Jiang & Huawei Niu, 2024. "The Co-Inhibiting Effect of Managerial Myopia on ESG Performance-Based Green Investment and Continuous Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Charl de Villiers & Jing Jia & Zhongtian Li, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility: A review of empirical research using Thomson Reuters Asset4 data," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4523-4568, December.
    5. Milind Kumar Jha & K. Rangarajan, 2020. "The approach of Indian corporates towards sustainable development: An exploration using sustainable development goals based model," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 1019-1032, September.
    6. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    7. Lu Zhang & Yuan George Shan & Millicent Chang, 2021. "Can CSR Disclosure Protect Firm Reputation During Financial Restatements?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 173(1), pages 157-184, September.
    8. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Wong, Jin Boon & Zhang, Qin, 2022. "Stock market reactions to adverse ESG disclosure via media channels," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(1).
    10. Amal Aouadi & Sylvain Marsat, 2018. "Do ESG Controversies Matter for Firm Value? Evidence from International Data," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 1027-1047, September.
    11. Natalia Semenova, 2021. "Management control systems in response to social and environmental risk in large Nordic companies," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 6(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Mirza, Nawazish & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Ha Nguyen, Thi Thu & Arfaoui, Nadia & Oliyide, Johnson A., 2023. "Are sustainable investments interdependent? The international evidence," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    13. David Souder & Greg Reilly & Philip Bromiley & Scott Mitchell, 2016. "A Behavioral Understanding of Investment Horizon and Firm Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 1202-1218, October.
    14. Shiyu Wu & Xinyi Li & Xiaosen Du & Zexin Li, 2022. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Firm Value: The Moderating Role of Ownership Structure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Wei, Jiuchang & Ouyang, Zhe & Chen, Haipeng (Allan), 2018. "CEO characteristics and corporate philanthropic giving in an emerging market: The case of China," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-11.
    16. Yu, Haixu & Liang, Chuanyu & Liu, Zhaohua & Wang, He, 2023. "News-based ESG sentiment and stock price crash risk," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    17. Adam Arian & John Sands & Stuart Tooley, 2023. "Industry and Stakeholder Impacts on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Financial Performance: Consumer vs. Industrial Sectors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Shakil, Mohammad Hassan, 2021. "Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    19. Ying, Ying & Wang, Shixiang & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Make bricks without straw: Eco-innovation for resource-constrained firms in emerging markets," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    20. Jiří Hnilica & Lorraine M. Uhlaner & Ondřej Machek & Ales Kubíček & Martin Lukeš & Martin Jurek & Petra Štamfestová, 2019. "The Role of Responsible Ownership and Family in Privately Held Firms with Multiple Owners: Preliminary Findings from the Czech Republic," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2019(5), pages 1-17.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:bmsmti:v:14:y:2023:i:2:p:85-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Technical Support Office to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/bms .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.