IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mth/ber888/v5y2015i2p170-190.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Personal Characteristics and Employees Perception towards the Objectivity of Performance Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Professor. Nader Abu Shiekhah
  • Assistant Professor. Nael Sarhan
  • Associate Professor. Muneer Abbad
  • Rasha M. S. Istaiteyeh

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of personal characteristics on employees' perception towards the objectivity of performance appraisal at Jordanian ministries. A quantitative approach was established by collecting 283 questionnaires. Descriptive analysis, T-Test and ANOVA technics were used. The results of this study found out that there is an impact of the personal characteristics on the employees' perception towards the objectivity of performance appraisal among Jordanian ministries. Moreover, the results proposed that the employees believed that the performance appraisal process is not objective. The study provides a number of recommendations that help governmental managers to deal with the employees' performance appraisal errors to be more objective in the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Professor. Nader Abu Shiekhah & Assistant Professor. Nael Sarhan & Associate Professor. Muneer Abbad & Rasha M. S. Istaiteyeh, 2015. "The Impact of Personal Characteristics and Employees Perception towards the Objectivity of Performance Appraisal," Business and Economic Research, Macrothink Institute, vol. 5(2), pages 170-190, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:170-190
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/7773/7319
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber/article/view/7773
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carol Clarke & Mark Harcourt & Matthew Flynn, 2013. "Clinical Governance, Performance Appraisal and Interactional and Procedural Fairness at a New Zealand Public Hospital," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(3), pages 667-678, October.
    2. Taylor & Beh, 2013. "The Impact of Pay-for-Performance Schemes on the Performance of Australian and Malaysian Government Employees," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(8), pages 1090-1115, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jonathan Farrar & Steven E. Kaplan & Linda Thorne, 2019. "The Effect of Interactional Fairness and Detection on Taxpayers’ Compliance Intentions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 167-180, January.
    2. Nadeem, Sadia & Raza, Mishal & Kayani, Neelab & Aziz, Amna & Nayab, Dure, 2018. "Examining cross-cultural compatibility of high performance work practices," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 27(3), pages 563-583.
    3. Artner, Annamária, 2013. "A fiatalok munkanélküliségének kérdéséhez Európa példáján keresztül [Contribution to the problem of the youth unemployment through the example of Europe]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(12), pages 1370-1392.
    4. Margaret Brunton, 2017. "Risking the Sustainability of the Public Health System: Ethical Conundrums and Ideologically Embedded Reform," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(4), pages 719-734, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Performance Appraisal; Personal Characteristics Employees¡¯ Perception; Objectivity Appraisal; Ministries; Jordan;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mth:ber888:v:5:y:2015:i:2:p:170-190. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Technical Support Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ber .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.