IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mnb/bullet/v8y2013ispecialp14-22.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Developments in public debt in Hungary between 1998 and 2012: trends, reasons and effects

Author

Listed:
  • Gergely Baksay

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

  • Tamás Berki

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

  • Iván Csaba
  • Emese Hudák

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

  • Tamás Kiss
  • Gergely Lakos

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

  • Zsolt Lovas

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

  • Gábor P. Kiss

    (Magyar Nemzeti Bank (the central bank of Hungary))

Abstract

Over the past decade, increasing public debt has become one of the most important problems for the Hungarian economy, significantly constraining the room for manoeuvre for fiscal policy and in some periods even calling into question its sustainability. As a percentage of GDP, gross public debt increased in the first half of the decade, mostly as a result of the high government deficit, after which economic stagnation and the eventual recession, along with a weakening exchange rate prevented a reduction of the debt ratio with tighter fiscal policy. By the end of the decade, public debt stood at around 80 per cent of GDP, which is very high compared to Hungary’s level of economic development and to regional competitors. As a result of tight fiscal policy and the one-off impact of the transformation of the private pension system, the rate of public debt has been declining modestly since 2010, but this has also been offset by the revaluation of FX debt as a result of HUF weakening. In this paper, we discuss the factors that contributed to the historically high public debt-to-GDP ratio by the end of the 2000s and identify the different subsections of the period between 1998 and 2012 that led to this situation. We treat the consequences of high public debt separately, present a survey of international data to compare debt ratios and note the differences between Hungary and other EU member states in terms of developments in public debt during the crisis.

Suggested Citation

  • Gergely Baksay & Tamás Berki & Iván Csaba & Emese Hudák & Tamás Kiss & Gergely Lakos & Zsolt Lovas & Gábor P. Kiss, 2013. "Developments in public debt in Hungary between 1998 and 2012: trends, reasons and effects," MNB Bulletin (discontinued), Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 8(Special), pages 14-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:mnb:bullet:v:8:y:2013:i:special:p:14-22
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.mnb.hu/letoltes/baksay-berki-csaba-hudak-kiss-lakos-lovas-pkiss.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Checherita-Westphal, Cristina & Rother, Philipp, 2010. "The impact of high and growing government debt on economic growth: an empirical investigation for the euro area," Working Paper Series 1237, European Central Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gergely Kicsák, 2017. "Developments in Government Interest Expenditure for Hungary, 2000–2015," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 16(1), pages 46-73.
    2. Gergely Kicsák & Dávid Benkõ & Noémi Végh, 2020. "Interest Savings of the Hungarian Budget between 2013 and 2019 in Comparison with Other EU Countries," Financial and Economic Review, Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary), vol. 19(4), pages 5-26.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Łukasz Rawdanowicz, 2014. "Choosing the pace of fiscal consolidation," OECD Journal: Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2013(1), pages 91-119.
    2. Bofinger, Peter & Franz, Wolfgang & Schmidt, Christoph M. & Weder di Mauro, Beatrice & Wiegard, Wolfgang, 2010. "Chancen für einen stabilen Aufschwung. Jahresgutachten 2010/11 [Chances for a stable upturn. Annual Report 2010/11]," Annual Economic Reports / Jahresgutachten, German Council of Economic Experts / Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der gesamtwirtschaftlichen Entwicklung, volume 127, number 201011.
    3. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/3l2vounfl99nvqsr0k24sn3k5l is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Döhrn, Roland & an de Meulen, Philipp & Barabas, György & Gebhardt, Heinz & Kitlinski, Tobias & Micheli, Martin & Schmidt, Torsten & Vosen, Simeon & Zimmermann, Lina, 2011. "Die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung im Inland: Zunehmende Risiken für die Konjunktur," RWI Konjunkturberichte, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, vol. 62(2), pages 41-90.
    5. Furceri, Davide & Zdzienicka, Aleksandra, 2012. "How costly are debt crises?," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 726-742.
    6. Balázs Égert, 2015. "Public debt, economic growth and nonlinear effects: Myth or reality?," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 226-238.
    7. Lenz, Rainer, 2015. "Banking 2025: The Bank of the Future," EconStor Preprints 110466, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    8. Ignat Ignatov, 2020. "The Choice Of An Approach To Fiscal Consolidation," Yearbook of the Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria, vol. 18(1), pages 131-144, July.
    9. Bettina Bökemeier & Christiane Clemens, 2016. "Does it Pay to Fulfill the Maastricht Convergence Criteria? - Reflections on the Public Debt and Growth Nexus for Selected European Economies," CESifo Working Paper Series 6161, CESifo.
    10. Vratislav Izák, 2014. "Private and Public Debt," European Financial and Accounting Journal, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(1), pages 4-21.
    11. Pan, Huiran & Wang, Chun, 2012. "Government debt in the euro area—Evidence from dynamic factor analysis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 115(2), pages 272-275.
    12. Balẳ Égert, 2015. "The 90% public debt threshold: the rise and fall of a stylized fact," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(34-35), pages 3756-3770, July.
    13. Aurora Elena DINA (MANOLACHE), 2018. "Comparative Assessment of Risk-Based Capital, Solvency II and Swiss Solvency Test," Theoretical and Applied Economics, Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica, vol. 0(Special), pages 61-72.
    14. ouhibi, saoussen & hammami, sami, 2018. "Does Public Debt Matter For Economic Growth? Evidence from southern Mediterranean countries," MPRA Paper 86378, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 16 May 2018.
    15. Mariarosaria Comunale & Francesco Paolo Mongelli, 2019. "Euro Area Growth and European Institutional Reforms," Bank of Lithuania Occasional Paper Series 24, Bank of Lithuania.
    16. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Razvan, 2013. "External debt management in Romania," MPRA Paper 52475, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 25 Sep 2013.
    17. Beirne, John & Fratzscher, Marcel, 2013. "The pricing of sovereign risk and contagion during the European sovereign debt crisis," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 60-82.
    18. Florian Henne, 2019. "Analyse de la soutenabilité de la dette publique au Luxembourg," BCL working papers 127, Central Bank of Luxembourg.
    19. Irina BILAN, 2014. "A Critical Analysis Of The Factors Lying Behind Recent Public Debt Accumulation In Romania," Journal of Public Administration, Finance and Law, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 6(6), pages 93-105, December.
    20. Rangan Gupta & Charl Jooste & Kanyane Matlou, 2014. "A time-varying approach to analysing fiscal policy and asset prices in South Africa," Journal of Financial Economic Policy, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 6(1), pages 46-63, April.
    21. Simone Salotti & Carmine Trecroci, 2012. "Even worse than you thought: The effects of government debt on investment and productivity," EcoMod2012 4200, EcoMod.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    government debt; fiscal policy;

    JEL classification:

    • H63 - Public Economics - - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt - - - Debt; Debt Management; Sovereign Debt

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mnb:bullet:v:8:y:2013:i:special:p:14-22. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maja Bajcsy (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/mnbgvhu.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.