IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mje/mjejnl/v13y2017i1p125-140.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of Institutional Changes in Transition Countries - the Gap Between the Theory and Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Veselin Draskovic
  • Evgeny Popov
  • Kestutis K. Peleckis

Abstract

The first part discusses the consequences of the deficit of real institutional changes in post-socialist SEE countries, and their substitutions by the various anti-developmental institutional imitations, which essentially had the character of alternative quasi-institutions and were in a function of enrichment for the privileged individuals. It points to the importance of neo-institutional economic theories (NET), which provide a sound grounds and recommendations for explanation of the imitation changes, which had anti-institutional and anti-development character.

Suggested Citation

  • Veselin Draskovic & Evgeny Popov & Kestutis K. Peleckis, 2017. "Modelling of Institutional Changes in Transition Countries - the Gap Between the Theory and Practice," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(1), pages 125-140.
    • Handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:125-140
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.mnje.com/mje/2017/v13-n01/mje_2017_v13-n01-a19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Veselin Draskovic & Mimo Draskovic, 2012. "Institutional Nihilism Of The Post-Socialist Transition," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 8(2), pages 191-206.
    2. Williamson, Oliver E, 1979. "Transaction-Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractural Relations," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 22(2), pages 233-261, October.
    3. Marcouiller, Douglas & Young, Leslie, 1995. "The Black Hole of Graft: The Predatory State and the Informal Economy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 85(3), pages 630-646, June.
    4. Elinor Ostrom, 2000. "Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 14(3), pages 137-158, Summer.
    5. Mimo Draškovic & Sanja Bauk & Dalia Streimikiene & Veselin Draskovic, 2017. "Testing the Level of Alternative Institutions as a Slowdown Factor of Economic Development: the Case of Montenegro," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 477-477, May.
    6. Evgenij Popov, 2006. "Theory Of Evolution In The Mini-Economics Institutions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 2(3), pages 57-74.
    7. Polterovich, Victor, 2007. "Institutional Trap," MPRA Paper 20595, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Polterovich, Victor & Popov, Vladimir, 2006. "Эволюционная Теория Экономической Политики: Часть I: Опыт Быстрого Развития [An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Policy: Part I: The Experience of Fast Development]," MPRA Paper 22168, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Kornai Janos, 1994. "Transformational Recession: The Main Causes," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(1), pages 39-63, August.
    10. North, Douglass C, 1987. "Institutions, Transaction Costs and Economic Growth," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 25(3), pages 419-428, July.
    11. Matthews, R C O, 1986. "The Economics of Institutions and the," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 96(384), pages 903-918, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Julija Kirsiene & Gabriele Miseviciute, 2017. "Comparative Analysis of Liability Cases for Bankruptcies of Financial Institutions," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 13(3), pages 85-99.
    2. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:85-99 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Mimo Draskovic, 2019. "Perception of the Impact of Negative Externalities on the Logistics Development of Adriatic Seaports of Koper, Rijeka and Bar," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 21(50), pages 228-228, February.
    4. Yelena Andreyeva & Andrei Maltsev & Mikhail Maslennikov & Artyom Ratner, 2018. "Global Economic Relations of a Region in the Investigations of the Institute of Economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(2), pages 612-622.
    5. repec:aud:audfin:v:21:y:2019:i:50:p:228 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Veronika Cabinova & Erika Onuferova & Peter Gallo Jr. & Peter Gallo & Juraj Gallo, 2018. "A Comparative Analysis of Modern Performance Methods in Economic Practice," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 14(4), pages 85-96.
    7. Alexandra Grigorievna POLYAKOVA & Julia Nikolaevna NESTERENKO & Elena Albertovna SVERDLIKOVA, 2018. "A Philosophical Approach of the Modernization Process of Russian Economy and Economic Institutions," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 109-128, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:mje:mjejnl:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:125-140 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Mimo Draskovic & Niksa Grgurevic & Milica Delibasic, 2015. "Institutional Properties of the South East European Region," Economy of region, Centre for Economic Security, Institute of Economics of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 1(3), pages 17-24.
    3. Wang, Sen & Bogle, Tim & van Kooten, G. Cornelis, 2012. "Forestry and the New Institutional Economics," Working Papers 130818, University of Victoria, Resource Economics and Policy.
    4. Hobbs, J., 2018. "Transaction Costs, Institutions and the Organization of Supply Chains: Three Good Questions," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277411, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Phan, Thu-Ha Dang & Brouwer, Roy & Davidson, Marc David, 2017. "A Global Survey and Review of the Determinants of Transaction Costs of Forestry Carbon Projects," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1-10.
    6. Frank A.G. den Butter, 2010. "Transaction Management: Value Creation by Reducing Transaction Costs," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 10-051/3, Tinbergen Institute.
    7. de Reuver, Mark & van der Lei, Telli & Lukszo, Zofia, 2016. "How should grid operators govern smart grid innovation projects? An embedded case study approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 628-635.
    8. Mimo Draškovic & Sanja Bauk & Dalia Streimikiene & Veselin Draskovic, 2017. "Testing the Level of Alternative Institutions as a Slowdown Factor of Economic Development: the Case of Montenegro," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(45), pages 477-477, May.
    9. Hoch, Felix & Lohwasser, Todor S., 2019. "The influence of institutions on venture capital: How transaction costs, uncertainty, and change affect new ventures," Discussion Papers of the Institute for Organisational Economics 9/2019, University of Münster, Institute for Organisational Economics.
    10. Polterovich, Victor, 2008. "Современное Состояние Теории Экономических Реформ [Modern Condition of the Theory of Economic Reforms]," MPRA Paper 22032, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Veselin Draskovic & Mimo Draskovic & Svitlana Bilan, 2019. "Motivation, Methodology, and Phenomenology of Institutional Nihilism in the SEE Countries," Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Economic Laboratory for Transition Research (ELIT), vol. 15(2), pages 7-14.
    12. Irina A. Zaraychenko & Aleksey I. Shinkevich & Mikhail Y. Shvetsov & Klavdiya G. Erdyneyeva & Lidiya A. Bordonskaya & Aleksandra E. Persidskaya & Sofya A. Rozhkova & Aleksandr A. Afanasyev, 2016. "Innovation Networks Modeling Within the Concept of Open Innovations," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(1), pages 192-198.
    13. Brendan Markey‐Towler, 2019. "The New Microeconomics: A Psychological, Institutional, and Evolutionary Paradigm with Neoclassical Economics as a Special Case," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 78(1), pages 95-135, January.
    14. Schweickert, Rainer, 1994. "Regional integration: A worthwhile strategy for catching up?," Kiel Working Papers 623, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Faulk Lewis, 2014. "Overcoming the Cause of Failure and the Role of Issue Salience: Toward a Comprehensive Theory for Nonprofit Activity and Competition in a Three-Sector Economy," Nonprofit Policy Forum, De Gruyter, vol. 5(2), pages 335-365, October.
    16. Tadesse, G. & Badiane, O., 2018. "The Boundary of Agricultural Marketing Cooperatives in Africa: A Conceptual framework and empirical evidence from Ethiopia," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 276964, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    17. Stefano Ciliberti & Angelo Frascarelli & Gaetano Martino, 2020. "Drivers of participation in collective arrangements in the agri‐food supply chain. Evidence from Italy using a transaction costs economics perspective," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 91(3), pages 387-409, September.
    18. Muñoz, Félix & Encinar, María Isabel & Fernández-de-Pinedo, Nadia, 2014. "Intentionality and technological and institutional change: Implications for economic development," Working Papers in Economic Theory 2014/04, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (Spain), Department of Economic Analysis (Economic Theory and Economic History).
    19. Engelbrecht, Hans-Jurgen, 1997. "A comparison and critical assessment of Porat and Rubin's information economy and Wallis and North's transaction sector1," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 271-290, December.
    20. Gary D. Libecap, 2014. "Addressing Global Environmental Externalities: Transaction Costs Considerations," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 52(2), pages 424-479, June.
    21. repec:dau:papers:123456789/331 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Zhan Wang & Xiangzheng Deng & Cecilia Wong, 2016. "Integrated Land Governance for Eco-Urbanization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mje:mjejnl:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:125-140. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nikola Draskovic Jelcic (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.mnje.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.