IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mir/mirbus/v5y2015i11p48-59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Perceptions of Auditor Responses to Evidence of Suspicious Activities: An Experimental Assessment

Author

Listed:
  • David S Murphy

    (Lynchburg College, United States.)

  • Scott Yetmar

    (Cleveland State University, United States.)

Abstract

This study assessed student perceptions of auditor responses to evidence that a client failed to respond appropriately to suspicious activities that could indicate money laundering. Subjects were presented with a series of randomized cases in which partner type (new vs. experienced), firm type (regional vs. international) and audit fee materiality (not material, material to the local office only, material to the firm) were manipulated asked to indicate their perceptions of the likelihood that an audit partner would discuss such evidence with the client, and the likelihood that the issue would be disclosed by the auditor. Both partner type and audit fee materiality was found to have significant effects on perceived likelihoods.

Suggested Citation

  • David S Murphy & Scott Yetmar, 2015. "Student Perceptions of Auditor Responses to Evidence of Suspicious Activities: An Experimental Assessment," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 5(11), pages 48-59, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:5:y:2015:i:11:p:48-59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://thejournalofbusiness.org/index.php/site/article/view/880/571
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ashton, Rh & Kramer, Ss, 1980. "Students As Surrogates In Behavioral Accounting Research - Some Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(1), pages 1-15.
    2. Mortensen, Tony & Fisher, Richard & Wines, Graeme, 2012. "Students as surrogates for practicing accountants: Further evidence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 251-265.
    3. Gregory A. Liyanarachchi & Markus J. Milne, 2005. "Comparing the investment decisions of accounting practitioners and students: an empirical study on the adequacy of student surrogates," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 121-135, June.
    4. Tony Mortensen & Richard Fisher & Graeme Wines, 2012. "Students as surrogates for practicing accountants: Further evidence," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(4), pages 251-265, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David S Murphy & Scott Yetmar, 2015. "Student Perceptions of Auditor Responses to Evidence of Suspicious Activities: An Experimental Assessment," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 5(11), pages 48-59, November.
    2. Stefan Linder, 2016. "Fostering strategic renewal: monetary incentives, merit-based promotions, and engagement in autonomous strategic action," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 251-280, May.
    3. Michał Krawczyk & Krzysztof Szczygielski, 2019. "Do professions curb free-riding? An experiment," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 47(3), pages 361-376, June.
    4. Duxbury, Darren, 2012. "Sunk costs and sunk benefits: A re-examination of re-investment decisions," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 144-156.
    5. Claus Holm & Pall Rikhardsson, 2008. "Experienced and Novice Investors: Does Environmental Information Influence Investment Allocation Decisions?," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 537-557.
    6. Linda Espahbodi & Reza Espahbodi & Norma Juma & Amy Westbrook, 2019. "Sustainability priorities, corporate strategy, and investor behavior," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(1), pages 149-167, January.
    7. Mortensen, Tony & Fisher, Richard & Wines, Graeme, 2012. "Students as surrogates for practicing accountants: Further evidence," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 251-265.
    8. Cédric Lesage & Yuan Ding & Thomas Jeanjean & Hervé Stolowy, 2009. "An experiment in the economic consequences of additional disclosure: The case of the Fair Value of Unlisted Equity Investments," Post-Print hal-00495573, HAL.
    9. Lorenz Graf-Vlachy, 2019. "Like student like manager? Using student subjects in managerial debiasing research," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 347-376, April.
    10. Ahn, Heinz & Vazquez Novoa, Nadia, 2016. "The decoy effect in relative performance evaluation and the debiasing role of DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(3), pages 959-967.
    11. Alexandra Rausch & Alexander Brauneis, 2015. "It’s about how the task is set: the inclusion–exclusion effect and accountability in preprocessing management information," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 23(2), pages 313-344, June.
    12. Bahigansenga Silas, 2023. "Effect of Parental Engagement on Students’ Performance in Bugesera District, Rwanda," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(8), pages 1878-1894, August.
    13. Singh, Bharati, 2021. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Behavioral Finance and Behavioral Accounting," American Business Review, Pompea College of Business, University of New Haven, vol. 24(2), pages 198-230, November.
    14. Bauermeister, Golo & Musshoff, Oliver, 2016. "Risk Aversion and Inconsistencies - Does the Choice of Risk Elicitation Method and Display Format Influence the Outcomes?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235348, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    15. Kevin Keasey & Philip Moon & Darren Duxbury, 2000. "Performance measurement and the use of league tables: some experimental evidence of dysfunctional consequences," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 275-286.
    16. Armstrong, J. Scott & Brodie, Roderick J., 1994. "Effects of portfolio planning methods on decision making: experimental results," MPRA Paper 81684, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    17. Petersen, Knut & Patzke, Henning, 1986. "Individuelles Informationsverhalten als Gegenstand des "Behavioral Accounting": Eine Meta-Analyse der empirischen Forschung," Manuskripte aus den Instituten für Betriebswirtschaftslehre der Universität Kiel 177, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre.
    18. Dezoort, F. T., 1998. "An analysis of experience effects on audit committee members' oversight judgments," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 23(1), pages 1-21, January.
    19. Armstrong, J. Scott & Coviello, Nicole & Safranek, Barbara, 1993. "Escalation bias: does it extend to marketing?," MPRA Paper 81685, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    20. Lindawati Gani & Johnny Jermias, 2012. "The Effects of Strategy–Management Control System Misfits on Firm Performance," Accounting Perspectives, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 11(3), pages 165-196, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mir:mirbus:v:5:y:2015:i:11:p:48-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: M Kabir (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csmirus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.