IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v14y2019i1p19-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benford’s Law As a Useful Tool to Determine Fraud in Financial Statements

Author

Listed:
  • Mateja Gorenc

    (International School of Social and Business Studies, Slovenia)

Abstract

Benford’s law is a mathematical tool and a method of determining whether investigated financial statements contain unintentional errors or fraud. Benford’s law says that counterfeit numbers have a slightly different pattern than valid or random samples. Benford’s Law is an effective method and analytical technique to help detect accounting fraud. Motives and causes for fraud can be explained by the fraud triangle, which consists of percieved pressure, perceived opportunities and the ability to justify their actions. Benford’s law is just one of the possible tools used to detect irregularities, which can also be used in the field of data verification in financial statements.

Suggested Citation

  • Mateja Gorenc, 2019. "Benford’s Law As a Useful Tool to Determine Fraud in Financial Statements," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 14(1), pages 19-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:19-31
    DOI: 10.26493/1854-4231.14.19-31
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/1854-4231/14.19-31.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/1854-4231.14.19-31?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hales, Douglas N. & Chakravorty, Satya S. & Sridharan, V., 2009. "Testing Benford's Law for improving supply chain decision-making: A field experiment," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 606-618, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asmus Olsen, 2013. "The politics of digits: evidence of odd taxation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 59-73, January.
    2. Horton, Joanne & Krishna Kumar, Dhanya & Wood, Anthony, 2020. "Detecting academic fraud using Benford law: The case of Professor James Hunton," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(8).
    3. Mu, Enrique & Carroll, James, 2016. "Development of a fraud risk decision model for prioritizing fraud risk cases in manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 30-42.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:19-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.