IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mgt/youmng/v13y2018i3p213-225.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could the Suitability of the Existing Accounting System be Argued?

Author

Listed:
  • Franko Milost

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

  • Ziga Cepar

    (University of Primorska, Slovenia)

Abstract

Accounting is a process of recording and studying financial data related to company’s operations. Its aims are above all to provide information about the events in company business life in an agreed language comprehensible to accounting information users and to provide information which is vital to business decision making. If we consider the above mentioned aims, we can establish that it is not easy to reach them. Accounting is not an exact science, which means that approximations or planned amounts are very often used as its tool. In addition, as the future is uncertain, we cannot determine the exact value an asset is about to achieve when converted into a monetary form, neither can we define the amount which is to be required to discharge a certain liability. And so we can ask ourselves if the existing accounting solutions enable us to create suitable accounting information. Our paper deals with the problem of the existing accounting system’s suitability. Four questions are investigated, namely the question of accounting solutions consistency, reality of financial statements, capability of creating accounting information which provides an optimal management of the elements of the business process and accounting solutions’ objectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Franko Milost & Ziga Cepar, 2018. "Could the Suitability of the Existing Accounting System be Argued?," Management, University of Primorska, Faculty of Management Koper, vol. 13(3), pages 213-225.
    • Handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:213-225
    DOI: 10.26493/1854-4231.13.213-225
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.hippocampus.si/ISSN/1854-4231/13.213-225.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.26493/1854-4231.13.213-225?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anne Wyatt, 2008. "What financial and non‐financial information on intangibles is value‐relevant? A review of the evidence," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 217-256.
    2. Barth, Mary E. & Beaver, William H. & Landsman, Wayne R., 2001. "The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 77-104, September.
    3. Douglas Skinner, 2008. "Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 191-204.
    4. Core, John E. & Guay, Wayne R. & Buskirk, Andrew Van, 2003. "Market valuations in the New Economy: an investigation of what has changed," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 43-67, January.
    5. Baruch Lev, 2008. "A rejoinder to Douglas Skinner's ‘Accounting for intangibles – a critical review of policy recommendations’," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(3), pages 209-213.
    6. Lev, B & Zarowin, P, 1999. "The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(2), pages 353-385.
    7. Xu-Dong Ji & Wei Lu, 2014. "The value relevance and reliability of intangible assets," Asian Review of Accounting, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 22(3), pages 182-216, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oliveira, Lídia & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2010. "Intangible assets and value relevance: Evidence from the Portuguese stock exchange," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 241-252.
    2. Lorena Mitrione & George Tanewski & Jacqueline Birt, 2014. "The relevance to firm valuation of research and development expenditure in the Australian health-care industry," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 39(3), pages 425-452, August.
    3. Schaberl, Philipp D., 2016. "Beyond accounting and back: An empirical examination of the relative relevance of earnings and “other” information," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 98-113.
    4. Sandra Brosnan & David O’Donnell & Philip O’Regan, 2019. "A performative exploration of the lifeworlds of human capital and financial capital: an intellectual capital case vignette," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 321-344, June.
    5. Jamal Barzegari Khanagha, 2011. "Value Relevance of Accounting Information in the United Arab Emirates," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 1(2), pages 33-45, June.
    6. Samudhram, Ananda & Stewart, Errol & Wickramanayake, Jayasinghe & Sinnakkannu, Jothee, 2014. "Value relevance of human capital based disclosures: Moderating effects of labor productivity, investor sentiment, analyst coverage and audit quality," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 338-353.
    7. Zhaoyang Gu, 2007. "Across‐sample Incomparability of R2s and Additional Evidence on Value Relevance Changes Over Time," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(7‐8), pages 1073-1098, September.
    8. Helena Isidro & José G. Dias, 2017. "Earnings quality and the heterogeneous relation between earnings and stock returns," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 49(4), pages 1143-1165, November.
    9. Kothari, S. P. & Shanken, Jay, 2003. "Time-series coefficient variation in value-relevance regressions: a discussion of Core, Guay, and Van Buskirk and new evidence," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1-3), pages 69-87, January.
    10. Guthrie, James & Ricceri, Federica & Dumay, John, 2012. "Reflections and projections: A decade of Intellectual Capital Accounting Research," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 68-82.
    11. Lam, Kevin C.K. & Sami, Heibatollah & Zhou, Haiyan, 2013. "Changes in the value relevance of accounting information over time: Evidence from the emerging market of China," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(2), pages 123-135.
    12. Rolf Uwe Fülbier & Thorsten Sellhorn, 2023. "Understanding and improving the language of business: How accounting and corporate reporting research can better serve business and society," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(6), pages 1089-1124, August.
    13. Dinh, Tami & Schultze, Wolfgang, 2022. "Accounting for R&D on the income statement? Evidence on non-discretionary vs. discretionary R&D capitalization under IFRS in Germany," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    14. repec:dau:papers:123456789/2165 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Mihaela Alina ROBU, 2014. "The Level Of Knowledge In The Value Relevance Literature," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 6(4), pages 122-135, December.
    16. Jeremiah Green & Henock Louis & Jalal Sani, 2022. "Intangible Investments, Scaling, and the Trend in the Accrual–Cash Flow Association," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(4), pages 1551-1582, September.
    17. Thomas Jeanjean & Anne Cazavan-Jeny, 2003. "Value relevance of R&D reporting: a signalling interpretation," Working Papers hal-00592028, HAL.
    18. Smith, Julia A. & Cordina, Renzo, 2014. "The role of accounting in high-technology investments," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 309-322.
    19. Photis Panayides & Neophytos Lambertides, 2011. "Fundamental Analysis and Relative Efficiency of Maritime Firms: Dry Bulk vs Tanker Firms," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    20. Maigoshi, Zaharaddeen Salisu & Latif, Rohaida Abdul & Kamardin, Hasnah, 2018. "Change in value-relevance of disclosed RPT across accounting regimes: Evidence from Malaysia," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 422-433.
    21. Warren Maroun & Wayne van Zijl & Rottok Chesaina & Robert Garnett, 2022. "The Beautiful Game: Fair Value, Accountability and Accounting for Player Registrations," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 32(3), pages 334-351, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mgt:youmng:v:13:y:2018:i:3:p:213-225. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alen Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkupsi.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.