IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mfa/journl/v31y2023i1p47-58.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determinants of Dividend Policies in Shariah Compliant and Non-Shariah Compliant Firms: A Panel Quantile Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Ashari Bakri

    (Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.)

  • Chia Chia Yong

    (Labuan Faculty of International Finance, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.)

Abstract

Research Questions: Do Shariah-compliant firms have a different dividend policy from non-Shariah-compliant firms? Does this policy reflect similarity at different quantile levels of dividend? Motivation: The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether Shariah-compliant firms have different determinants than non-Shariah-compliant firms, using the linear and panel quantile methods. Idea: The different selection criteria between Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant firms may contribute to a different dividend policy. Data: Data collected via DataStream and the Securities and Exchange Commission within the top 200 based on market capitalisation in 2019 for the period from 2010 to 2019. Method/ Tools: To test the hypothesis, the study used pooled OLS, random and fixed effects. To determine the most appropriate model, we use the Breusch-Pagan-Lagrange multiplier test (LM) and the Hausman test. To further investigate the difference between the dividend policy of Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant firms, the study also uses the quantile approach to examine the determinants of dividend at different quantile levels. Findings: The study not only reveals differences in the dividend policies of Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant firms in the linear approach, but also in the quantile approach. In a linear regression approach, firm size, growth opportunities, profitability, and free cash flow were found to be significant determinants of dividends for Shariah-compliant firms. On the other hand, firm size, growth opportunities, profitability, and risk were found to be significant determinants of dividends of non-Shariah-compliant firms. In the panel quantile approach, all tested variables (except at 0.50 quantile for non-Shariah compliant companies) were found to be significant determinants of dividend for both Shariah and non-Shariah compliant firms. The finding implies that the result of the linear approach may overgeneralize to different quantiles, so a comparison using a different approach may provide more insight into these determinants. Contributions: The study contributes to the existing knowledge on the determinants of dividend policy of Shariah-compliant and non-Shariah-compliant firms, especially by comparing it with the linear and quantile approaches, which has been neglected in previous studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Ashari Bakri & Chia Chia Yong, 2023. "Determinants of Dividend Policies in Shariah Compliant and Non-Shariah Compliant Firms: A Panel Quantile Approach," Capital Markets Review, Malaysian Finance Association, vol. 31(1), pages 47-58.
    • Handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:31:y:2023:i:1:p:47-58
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mfa.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/v31_i1_a3_pg47-58.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eugene F. Fama & Kenneth R. French, 2001. "Disappearing Dividends: Changing Firm Characteristics Or Lower Propensity To Pay?," Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, Morgan Stanley, vol. 14(1), pages 67-79, March.
    2. Koenker, Roger W & Bassett, Gilbert, Jr, 1978. "Regression Quantiles," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 46(1), pages 33-50, January.
    3. Linda Allen & Aron Gottesman, 2006. "The Informational Efficiency of the Equity Market As Compared to the Syndicated Bank Loan Market," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 30(1), pages 5-42, August.
    4. Mohammed Omran & John Pointon, 2004. "Dividend Policy, Trading Characteristics And Share Prices: Empirical Evidence From Egyptian Firms," International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance (IJTAF), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 7(02), pages 121-133.
    5. Michael S. Rozeff, 1982. "Growth, Beta And Agency Costs As Determinants Of Dividend Payout Ratios," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 5(3), pages 249-259, September.
    6. Rafael La Porta & Florencio Lopez‐de‐Silanes & Andrei Shleifer & Robert W. Vishny, 2000. "Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(1), pages 1-33, February.
    7. Durand, Robert B. & Koh, SzeKee & Limkriangkrai, Manapon, 2013. "Saints versus Sinners. Does morality matter?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 166-183.
    8. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    9. Varouj Aivazian & Laurence Booth & Sean Cleary, 2003. "Do Emerging Market Firms Follow Different Dividend Policies From U.S. Firms?," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 26(3), pages 371-387, September.
    10. Hong, Harrison & Kacperczyk, Marcin, 2009. "The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 15-36, July.
    11. Armando Gomes, 2000. "Going Public without Governance: Managerial Reputation Effects," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 55(2), pages 615-646, April.
    12. Imamah, Nur & Lin, Tsui-Jung & Suhadak, & Handayani, Siti Ragil & Hung, Jung-Hua, 2019. "Islamic law, corporate governance, growth opportunities and dividend policy in Indonesia stock market," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 110-126.
    13. Omar Farooq & Oumkeltoum Tbeur, 2013. "Dividend policies of shariah-compliant and non-shariah-compliant firms: evidence from the MENA region," International Journal of Economics and Business Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(2), pages 158-172.
    14. Nor Aziah Abu Kasim, 2012. "Disclosure ofShariahcompliance by Malaysiantakafulcompanies," Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 3(1), pages 20-38, April.
    15. Brickley, James A. & Lease, Ronald C. & Smith, Clifford Jr., 1988. "Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1-2), pages 267-291, January.
    16. Grossman, S J & Hart, O D, 1980. "Disclosure Laws and Takeover Bids," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 35(2), pages 323-334, May.
    17. Anwer, Zaheer & Mohamad, Shamsher & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2021. "Dividend payout policy of Shariah compliant firms: Evidence from United States," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    18. Higgins, Robert C., 1972. "The Corporate Dividend-Saving Decision," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 1527-1541, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jabbouri, Imad, 2016. "Determinants of corporate dividend policy in emerging markets: Evidence from MENA stock markets," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 283-298.
    2. Anwer, Zaheer & Mohamad, Shamsher & Paltrinieri, Andrea & Hassan, M. Kabir, 2021. "Dividend payout policy of Shariah compliant firms: Evidence from United States," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    3. David S. Koo & Santhosh Ramalingegowda & Yong Yu, 2017. "The effect of financial reporting quality on corporate dividend policy," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 753-790, June.
    4. Basharat Khan & Qiujun Zhao & Amjad Iqbal & Irfan Ullah & Shahab Aziz, 2022. "Internal Dynamics of Dividend Policy in East-Asia: A Comparative Study of Japan and South Korea," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    5. Dodig Ante & Dzidic Ante, 2022. "Dividend Policies in Volatile Transitioning Markets," Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 25(1), pages 111-132.
    6. J. Thomas Connelly & Christian C. P. Wolff, 2023. "Dividend Policy Decisions and Ownership Concentration: Evidence from Thai Public Companies," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 26(01), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Yu, Chih-Ping, 2015. "Financial policies on firm performance: The U.S. insurance industry before and after the global financial crisis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 391-402.
    8. Esqueda, Omar A., 2016. "Signaling, corporate governance, and the equilibrium dividend policy," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 186-199.
    9. Lukas Setia‐Atmaja & George A. Tanewski & Michael Skully, 2009. "The Role of Dividends, Debt and Board Structure in the Governance of Family Controlled Firms," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(7‐8), pages 863-898, September.
    10. Haleem, Fazli & Javid, Attiya Yasmin, 2011. "Modeling Dividend Behavior in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 37564, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Mahboubeh Bahreini & Cahit Adaoglu, 2018. "Dividend payouts of travel and leisure companies in Western Europe," Tourism Economics, , vol. 24(7), pages 801-820, November.
    12. Gonzalez, Maximiliano & Molina, Carlos A. & Pablo, Eduardo & Rosso, John W., 2017. "The effect of ownership concentration and composition on dividends: Evidence from Latin America," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-18.
    13. Seyed Alireza Athari, 2021. "The effects of institutional settings and risks on bank dividend policy in an emerging market: Evidence from Tobit model," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 4493-4515, July.
    14. Yasuharu Aoki, 2014. "How Does the Largest Shareholder Affect Dividends?," International Review of Finance, International Review of Finance Ltd., vol. 14(4), pages 613-645, December.
    15. Berzins, Janis & Bøhren, Øyvind & Stacescu, Bogdan, 2019. "Dividends and taxes: The moderating role of agency conflicts," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 583-604.
    16. Stereńczak, Szymon & Kubiak, Jarosław, 2022. "Dividend policy and stock liquidity: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    17. Duha Al-Kuwari, 2012. "Are Large Shareholders Conducting Influential Monitoring in Emerging Markets? An Investigation into the Impact of Large Shareholders on Dividend Decisions: The Case of Kuwait," Research in World Economy, Research in World Economy, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(2), pages 52-67, September.
    18. Hussein Abedi Shamsabadi & Byung-Seong Min & Richard Chung, 2016. "Corporate governance and dividend strategy: lessons from Australia," International Journal of Managerial Finance, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 12(5), pages 583-610, October.
    19. Darakhshan Younis & Attiya Yasmin Javid, 2014. "Market Imperfections and Dividend Policy Decisions of Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan," PIDE-Working Papers 2014:99, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    20. Farooq, Omar & Ahmed, Neveen, 2019. "Dividend policy and political uncertainty: Evidence from the US presidential elections," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 201-209.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Islamic finance; Shariah-compliant; dividend policy; Malaysia; quantile regression.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G0 - Financial Economics - - General
    • G1 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mfa:journl:v:31:y:2023:i:1:p:47-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Capital Market Review (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.