IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v42y2008i2p527-535.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Logics of Justification and Logics of Action

Author

Listed:
  • David Dequech

Abstract

This article attempts to contribute to the debate on institutional logics, logics of action, identities, and the like, as part of the larger debate about both the concept of institutions and the theory of how institutions influence our thought and behavior. It proposes a distinction between logics of justification and logics of action. The establishment of a metric for worth does not always have to be associated with a logic of justification. In addition, in some situations justification may not be necessary. Furthermore, a person may do something for a reason and claim to have done it for another reason.

Suggested Citation

  • David Dequech, 2008. "Logics of Justification and Logics of Action," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 527-535, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:527-535
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sini Forssell & Leena Lankoski, 2017. "Navigating the tensions and agreements in alternative food and sustainability: a convention theoretical perspective on alternative food retail," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 34(3), pages 513-527, September.
    2. Christel Dumas & Céline Louche, 2016. "Collective beliefs for responsible investment," Post-Print hal-01183744, HAL.
    3. Inna F. Deviatko & Kirill A. Gavrilov, 2020. "Causality and Blame Judgments of Negative Side Effects of Actions May Differ for Different Institutional Domains," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:42:y:2008:i:2:p:527-535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.