IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mcb/jmoncb/v21y1989i3p368-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Banking Costs, Generalized Functional Forms, and Estimation of Economies of Scale and Scope

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence, Colin

Abstract

Recently, researchers have claimed that the primitive Cobb-Douglas production technology captures banking cost functions adequately. These findings rule out scope economies and U-shaped cost curves. The rejection of the generalized flexible form postulated by the above authors is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition to justify a Cobb-Douglas specification. Using restricted generalized functional forms, the authors find that the composite output Cobb-Douglas specification is an inadequate description of banking cost technology. Translog specifications with multiple products capture the data best, suggesting the presence of both scope and scale economies. Copyright 1989 by Ohio State University Press.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence, Colin, 1989. "Banking Costs, Generalized Functional Forms, and Estimation of Economies of Scale and Scope," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 21(3), pages 368-379, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:21:y:1989:i:3:p:368-79
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-2879%28198908%2921%3A3%3C368%3ABCGFFA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-V&origin=bc
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David B. Humphrey, 1990. "Why do estimates of bank scale economies differ?," Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, vol. 76(Sep), pages 38-50.
    2. Stephen M. Miller & Terrence M. Clauretie & Thomas M. Springer, 2006. "Economies Of Scale And Cost Efficiencies: A Panel‐Data Stochastic‐Frontier Analysis Of Real Estate Investment Trusts," Manchester School, University of Manchester, vol. 74(4), pages 483-499, July.
    3. Elyas Elyasiani & Rasoul Rezvanian, 2002. "A comparative multiproduct cost study of foreign-owned and domestic-owned US banks," Applied Financial Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 271-284.
    4. Shaik, Saleem & Addey, Kwame & Yeboah, Osei, 2017. "Efficiency Gains Due To Economies Of Scope And Scale," 2017 Annual Meeting, February 4-7, 2017, Mobile, Alabama 252790, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    5. Jason Allen & Ying Liu, 2007. "Efficiency and economies of scale of large Canadian banks," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(1), pages 225-244, February.
    6. Jun Du & Sourafel Girma, 2011. "Cost economies, efficiency and productivity growth in the Chinese banking industry: evidence from a quarterly panel dataset," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 41(1), pages 199-226, August.
    7. Helmers, Glenn A. & Langemeier, Michael R. & Shaik, Saleem, 2005. "Measuring Scope And Scale Efficiency Gains Due To Specialization," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19388, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Suominen, Matti, 1991. "Competition in Finnish banking: Two tests," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 8/1991, Bank of Finland.
    9. Danny Leung & Terence Yuen, 2007. "Labour Market Adjustments to Exchange Rate Fluctuations: Evidence from Canadian Manufacturing Industries," Open Economies Review, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 177-189, April.
    10. H. Naci Mocan, 1995. "The Child Care Industry: Cost Functions, Efficiency, and Quality," NBER Working Papers 5293, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Evren Ors, 2004. "Postmortem on the Federal Reserve's Functional Cost Analysis Program: how useful was the FCA?," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(1-2), pages 121-148.
    12. Tiffany Hutcheson & Ian G. Sharpe, 1998. "Ownership Structure and Building Society Efficiency," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 23(2), pages 151-168, December.
    13. Madhav Regmi & Allen M. Featherstone & Cortney A. Cowley & Mykel R. Taylor, 2021. "Big Banks versus Agricultural Banks: Has Too‐Big‐To‐Fail Regulation Affected Efficiency and Scale Economies Measures?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 103(3), pages 1164-1178, May.
    14. Toivanen, Otto, 1997. "Economies of scale and scope in the Finnish non-life insurance industry," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 759-779, June.
    15. Helmers, Glenn A. & Shaik, Saleem & Atwood, Joseph A., 2003. "Social And Scale Efficiency Gains Due To Vertical Integration In The U.S. Hog Sector," 2003 Annual Meeting, February 1-5, 2003, Mobile, Alabama 35143, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Ors, Evren, 2004. "Postmortem on the Federal Reserve's Functional Cost Analysis Program: how useful was the FCA?," Review of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1-2), pages 121-148.
    17. Stephen M. Miller & Thomas M. Springer, 2007. "Cost Improvements, Returns to Scale, and Cost Inefficiencies for Real Estate Investment Trusts," Working papers 2007-05, University of Connecticut, Department of Economics.
    18. Noha Farrag & Guenter Lang, 2012. "The Egyptian Banking Sector: Assessing Efficiency Using a Stochastic Frontier Cost Function," Working Papers 33, The German University in Cairo, Faculty of Management Technology.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mcb:jmoncb:v:21:y:1989:i:3:p:368-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-2879 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.