IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/zwipol/v66y2017i3p257-265n6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ÖPP – eine Linderung, keine Lösung

Author

Listed:
  • Puls Thomas

    (Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, Kompetenzfeld Umwelt, Energie, Infrastruktur, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 21, 50668 KölnGermany, Tel.: (0221)4981–766)

  • Schaefer Thilo

    (Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft, Kompetenzfeld Umwelt, Energie, Infrastruktur, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 21, 50668 KölnGermany, Tel.: (0221)4981–791)

Abstract

In the german debate about the reorganization of the fiscal relations between federal and „Länder“ level there was an intense discussion concerning public-private partnerships (PPP). In the end the limitation of PPP projects even reached constitutional level. Nonetheless PPP will have a future because the newly created highway agency is faced with structural problems. Neither the personal capacities of the agencies nor the legal regulations have been changed. Therefore the problems remain and PPP offer the chance to alleviate these problems. PPP are potential alternatives to address the shortcomings of conventional projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Puls Thomas & Schaefer Thilo, 2017. "ÖPP – eine Linderung, keine Lösung," Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 66(3), pages 257-265, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:66:y:2017:i:3:p:257-265:n:6
    DOI: 10.1515/zfwp-2017-0019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2017-0019
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/zfwp-2017-0019?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bardt, Hubertus & Grömling, Michael & Hentze, Tobias & Puls, Thomas, 2017. "Investieren Staat und Unternehmen in Deutschland zu wenig? Bestandsaufnahme und Handlungsbedarf," IW-Analysen, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute, volume 118, number 118.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felix Rösel & Julia Wolffson, 2022. "Chronischer Investitionsmangel — eine deutsche Krankheit [Chronic Lack of Investment — a German Disease]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 102(7), pages 529-533, July.
    2. Belitz Heike & Gornig Martin, 2023. "Digitalisation and Modernity of Capital Stock in Europe," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Sciendo, vol. 58(5), pages 260-266, September.
    3. Hüther Michael & Südekum Jens, 2019. "Die Schuldenbremse – eine falsche Fiskalregel am falschen Platz," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 20(4), pages 284-291, December.
    4. Hubertus Bardt & Anja Katrin Orth, 2019. "Schrumpfende Boomregionen – ein Problemfall der regionalen Entwicklung," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 72(09), pages 38-44, May.
    5. Hüther, Michael, 2019. "10 Jahre Schuldenbremse: Ein Konzept mit Zukunft?," IW policy papers 3/2019, Institut der deutschen Wirtschaft (IW) / German Economic Institute.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:zwipol:v:66:y:2017:i:3:p:257-265:n:6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.