IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lus/reveco/v63y2012i2p187-235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Was sind die richtigen Rentenabschläge? – neue Perspektiven

Author

Listed:
  • Gasche Martin

    (Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA), Am Max-Planck-Institut für Sozialrecht und Sozialpolitik Amalienstraße 33, 80799 München, Telefon: 089 38602 351)

Abstract

The correct adjustment of pension benefits when postponing retirement is calculated by three „income-oriented“ approaches: the incentive-neutral approach, the budget-neutral approach and as an innovation the return-neutral approach. It turns out, that the three approaches differ just in their underlying discount rate but not in their method of calculation. In addition it can be shown, that the incentive-neutral approach leads to incentive neutrality when the implicit taxation of contributions is equal to the implicit taxation of the early retirement pension. The correct adjustment factors were also calculated for those cases, where the relevant alternative for early retirement is unemployment or not to continue work. As an alternative to the income-oriented approaches the utility-based approach is presented. In this case the results strongly depend on the underlying utility function and the parametric values. Overall, the statutory adjustment factor of 3,6 % per year tends to be too low applying the income-oriented approaches. Using the utility-based approach, the calculated adjustment rates can be seen as too high or too low, depending on the assumptions on the utility function and the parameter constellation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gasche Martin, 2012. "Was sind die richtigen Rentenabschläge? – neue Perspektiven," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 63(2), pages 187-235, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:lus:reveco:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:187-235
    DOI: 10.1515/roe-2012-0205
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/roe-2012-0205
    Download Restriction: For access to full text, subscription to the journal or payment for the individual article is required.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/roe-2012-0205?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Knell, Markus, 2021. "Actuarial deductions for early retirement," Journal of Demographic Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 87(2), pages 141-167, June.
    2. Börsch-Supan, Axel & Härtl, Klaus & Leite, Duarte N., 2018. "Earnings test, non-actuarial adjustments and flexible retirement," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 78-83.
    3. Börsch-Supan, A. & Härtl, K. & Leite, D.N., 2016. "Social Security and Public Insurance," Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, in: Piggott, John & Woodland, Alan (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 781-863, Elsevier.
    4. Axel Börsch-Supan & Johannes Rausch & Nicolas Goll, 2019. "Social Security Reforms and the Changing Retirement Behavior in Germany," NBER Chapters, in: Social Security Programs and Retirement around the World: Reforms and Retirement Incentives, pages 175-226, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Axel H. Börsch-Supan & Johannes Rausch & Nicolas Goll, 2020. "Social Security Reforms and the Changing Retirement Behavior in Germany," NBER Working Papers 27518, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Börsch-Supan, Axel & Bucher-Koenen, Tabea & Ferrari, Irene & Kutlu Koc, Vesile & Rausch, Johannes, 1970. "The Development of the Pension Gap and German Households’ Saving Behavior," MEA discussion paper series 201602, Munich Center for the Economics of Aging (MEA) at the Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lus:reveco:v:63:y:2012:i:2:p:187-235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.