Author
Listed:
- Olena Horlova
(Ph.D., Associate Professor of the Department of World Literature, Horlivka Institute for Foreign Languages Donbas State Pedagogical University)
- Tetiana Marchenko
(Candidate of Philological Sciences, Associate Professor, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University, Department of Theory of Literature and Foreign Literature, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University)
- Hennadii Moskalyk
(Doctor of Science in Philosophy, Professor of the Department of Psychology, Pedagogy and Philosophy, Kremenchuk National University named after Mykhailo Ostrogradskyi)
- Halyna Avksentieva
(Candidate of Science in Philology, Associate Professor at the Department of Ukrainian and Foreign Literatures, South Ukrainian National Pedagogical University named after K. D. Ushynsky)
- Liubov Slyvka
(Candidate of Philological Sciences, Senior Lecturer of the Department of English Language and Translation, Drohobych Ivan Franko State Pedagogical University)
- Svitlana Maksymenko
(Candidate of Art History, Associate Professor of the Department of Theater Studies and Acting, Faculty of Culture and Arts, Ivan Franko National University of Lviv)
Abstract
In the article the authors presented the results of associative-essayistic quasi-experiment, which revealed the modalities of perception, reflection and reception of students' reading of postmodern novels of the famous Ukrainian writer Andrukhovych “The Recreation†(2017), “The Perversion†(1996) and “Moscoviada†(2000). The relevance of the article is determined by the lack of methods for diagnosing professional and amateur reader's reflection in Ukraine and Western Europe. The relevance of the article lies not only in the popularity of Andruchovych’s work in Europe (2022 received the Heine Prize) but also in the lack of methods and strategies for forming and monitoring reading competence in the reception of a postmodern work. From the point of view of readerly intertextual communication, Andrukhovych’s novels (1996; 2000; 2017) are potentially open to many interpretive strategies. The main reason for this is their being on the verge of postmodernist and new realist paradigms, which implies distancing from the accumulation of citations and the practice of using intertext according to a certain extraliterary intention. Consequently, the purpose of the article is to identify the precedent texts, that form a system of reader's absentee communication when reading the novels of Andrukhovych (1996; 2000; 2017). In order to achieve the goal, the study applied a comprehensive approach. In the article the authors proved the relevance of the phenomena of the town and river timeline and travel timeline in the perception of the professional reader; demonstrated that the nearest textual coincidence of urban chronotopes of novels by Andrukhovych (1996; 2000; 2017) is work by Pidmohylnyi (2008), Gogol (2022) and others. The main of these coincidences is the threefold structure of the city and the pathos of the romantic line. The main conclusion of the article is the orientation of the vector of intertextual interaction in the novel towards the representation of the eternal archetype of the cultural hero, on whom the reader projects his or her Ego. The international relevance of the article is determined by the wide popularity of Andrukhovych’s works in Europe and the recent receipt of the Heine Prize (2022).
Suggested Citation
Olena Horlova & Tetiana Marchenko & Hennadii Moskalyk & Halyna Avksentieva & Liubov Slyvka & Svitlana Maksymenko, 2024.
"Quasi-educational Strategies for Diagnosing Readerly Reflection: Timeline as an Intertext in Literary Studies and Educational Aspects of the Formation of Reading Competence,"
Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 16(2), pages 625-641, June.
Handle:
RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:625-641
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/rrem/16.2/876
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:2:p:625-641. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.