IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/lum/rev1rl/v12y2023i1p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explanatory Value of Reason in Public Space: Use and Misuse in Political Speech

Author

Listed:
  • Laura PRICOP

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Romania)

Abstract

In this article, the concept of communicative rationality and its practical application in public debates will be explored. Focusing on the importance of the communicative treatment of reason, validity, and its practical implications, the article critically examines Jürgen Habermas's theory of communicative action and its ethical elements. The potential difficulties of bridging the gap between theory and practice are highlighted by discussing the distinction between theoretical discourse and discursive practice. Through an analysis of Habermas' approach, the paper aims to improve public discourse quality and understand how communicative reason works in practical terms. It considers the pragmatic context of communicative action, the importance of claiming validity, and the process of validating. It discusses the concept of communicative reason in the context of concrete instances of communication, such as public discussion. It emphasizes the importance of communicative reason and the pursuit of the common good in promoting productive discussion and compromise.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura PRICOP, 2023. "Explanatory Value of Reason in Public Space: Use and Misuse in Political Speech," Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/12.1/74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/lumenss/article/view/6377/4475
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.18662/lumenss/12.1/74?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Rationality; Reasonableness; Rationalisation; Validity; Parliamentary Debate;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I2 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:12:y:2023:i:1:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antonio Sandu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edituralumen.ro .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.