IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksb/journl/v10y2017p81-100.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

To Evaluate the Important Factor for Achieving Team Effectiveness in the Small Projects: An Analytical Hierarchical Process Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Masood Mir

    (Assistant Professor, Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute OF Technology PhD Scholar, Muhammad Ali Jinnah University)

  • Mehran Tunio

    (PhD Scholar, Muhammad Ali Jinnah University)

  • Faakhir Husnain

    (PhD Scholar, Muhammad Ali Jinnah University)

Abstract

The team effectiveness is the most important phenomenon whenever the team work is performed, in the small projects either within the organizations or any other projects like, special assignments, Building dams, roads and many other which requires a team work. It is the most important thing for any team work to complete the assign task with the efficiency and the effectiveness. So it is the most important thing to find out which factors has the most importance in any sort of small projects to achieve the effectiveness. For this researcher has collected the responses from the experts which are having 10 plus experiences in the project management and have completed many projects which requires a team work. The collected responses therefore check with the help of expert choice, analytical hierarchical process (AHP), so that the important factors can be sort out and the weightage suggest which factor to focus most and what to focus after that so on. The team effectiveness model has been adopted and on the basis of that it has been checked which dimension and in that which sub dimension is the most important factor within the team work for creating the effectiveness. For achieving this task the Bi-polar questionnaire has been used and collected data from the experts.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Masood Mir & Mehran Tunio & Faakhir Husnain, 2017. "To Evaluate the Important Factor for Achieving Team Effectiveness in the Small Projects: An Analytical Hierarchical Process Approach," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 10, pages 81-100, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksb:journl:v:10:y:2017:p:81-100
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://kasbit.edu.pk/KBJVol-10/Paper%204.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bruce C. Skaggs & Mark Youndt, 2004. "Strategic positioning, human capital, and performance in service organizations: a customer interaction approach," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(1), pages 85-99, January.
    2. Mike Tayles & Richard H. Pike & Saudah Sofian, 2007. "Intellectual capital, management accounting practices and corporate performance," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 20(4), pages 522-548, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muhammad Shujaat Mubarik & V. G. R. Chandran & Evelyn S. Devadason, 2018. "Measuring Human Capital in Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises: What Matters?," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 137(2), pages 605-623, June.
    2. Yi-Ching Hsieh & Hung-Chang Chiu & Yun-Chia Tang & Wei-Yun Lin, 2018. "Does Raising Value Co-creation Increase All Customers’ Happiness?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(4), pages 1053-1067, November.
    3. John S Heywood & Uwe Jirjahn & Annika Pfister, 2020. "Product market competition and employer provided training in Germany," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 29(2), pages 533-556.
    4. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Józef Ledzianowski, 2021. "The Competency Niche: An Exploratory Study," Risks, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-11, October.
    5. Xiao Zhang & Luqun Xie & Jiatao Li & Li Cheng, 2022. "“Outside in”: Global demand heterogeneity and dynamic capabilities of multinational enterprises," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(4), pages 709-722, June.
    6. Giuliani, Marco & Skoog, Matti, 2020. "Making sense of the temporal dimension of intellectual capital: A critical case study," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Tecla Kirwa & Vincent Ngeno, 2020. "Organizational Capital and Financial Performance; What is the Mediation Effect of Firm Innovation: Evidence from Insurance Firms in Kenya," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 90-96.
    8. Dat T. Nguyen & Tu D. Q. Le & Tin H. Ho, 2021. "Intellectual Capital and Bank Risk in Vietnam—A Quantile Regression Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-15, January.
    9. Jean–Luc Arregle & Lucia Naldi & Mattias Nordqvist & Michael A. Hitt, 2012. "Internationalization of Family–Controlled Firms: A Study of the Effects of External Involvement in Governance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 36(6), pages 1115-1143, November.
    10. Sandra Brosnan & David O’Donnell & Philip O’Regan, 2019. "A performative exploration of the lifeworlds of human capital and financial capital: an intellectual capital case vignette," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 23(2), pages 321-344, June.
    11. Wasim-ul-REHMAN,* & Nabila ASGHAR** & Hafeez ur Rehman***, 2017. "Knowledge Sharing Practices on Performance: Role of Intellectuals on South Asian Perspective," Pakistan Journal of Applied Economics, Applied Economics Research Centre, vol. 27(2), pages 297-329.
    12. Bourke, Jane & Roper, Stephen & Love, James H., 2020. "Innovation in legal services: The practices that influence ideation and codification activities," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 132-147.
    13. Raquel Ortega-Lapiedra & Miguel Marco-Fondevila & Sabina Scarpellini & Fernando Llena-Macarulla, 2019. "Measurement of the Human Capital Applied to the Business Eco-Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, June.
    14. Tecla Kirwa & Vincent Ngeno, 2020. "Organizational Capital and Financial Performance; What is the Mediation Effect of Firm Innovation: Evidence from Insurance Firms in Kenya," Journal of Accounting, Business and Finance Research, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 8(2), pages 72-78.
    15. Wasim ul Rehman & Suleyman Degirmen & Fareeha Waseem, 2022. "Propensity for and Quality of Intellectual Capital Divulgence Across the BRICS Banking Sector: A Knowledge-Based Perspective from Emerging Economies," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(2), pages 1028-1055, June.
    16. Knauer, Thorsten, 2010. "Relevanz, Qualität und Determinanten der externen Unternehmenspublizität zum Humankapital: Eine empirische Bestandsaufnahme der HDAX-Unternehmen," Arbeitspapiere des Lehrstuhls für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, insbesondere Controlling 13-1, University of Münster, Chair of Management Accounting.
    17. Chai Bin Feng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Raheel Safdar & Sultan Sikandar Mirza & Amjad Iqbal, 2023. "Corporate strategic responses, supplier concentration and sustainable growth of chinese listed firms," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1413-1427, September.
    18. Kaouthar Lajili, 2015. "Embedding human capital into governance design: a conceptual framework," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 19(4), pages 741-762, November.
    19. Hoffmann, Antje & Herstatt, Cornelius, 2005. "Service provider - customer interactions: Key to success of innovative services," Working Papers 30, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute for Technology and Innovation Management.
    20. Chowdhury, Sanjib & Miles, Grant, 2006. "Customer-induced uncertainty in predicting organizational design: Empirical evidence challenging the service versus manufacturing dichotomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(1), pages 121-129, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksb:journl:v:10:y:2017:p:81-100. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Yasir Jaseem (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fmkaspk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.