IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A munkavállalói tulajdon visszaszorulása Magyarországon
[The decline of employee ownership in Hungary]

Author

Listed:
  • Neumann, László
  • Boda, Dorottya

Abstract

A tanulmány azokról a privatizációs esetekről szól, amelyekben a "belső vásárlók", a beosztott dolgozók és a vállalati vezetők szereztek tulajdonrészt, s elsősorban azt vizsgáljuk, hogy a privatizációs politika 1992 és 1995 közötti preferált vevői képesek voltak-e hosszabb távon a tulajdon megtartására és sikeres működtetésére. Áttekintjük a munkavállalói tulajdon kialakulásának körülményeit, az ilyen vállalatok gazdasági működésének eredményeit, valamint munkaszervezetük, érdekviszonyaik sajátosságait. Kérdés, hogy milyen esélyei lehetnek e tulajdonformának a mai magyar piacgazdaság körülményei között, ahol számos ágazatban a külföldi tőkeberuházásra alapozott gazdasági növekedés vált dominánssá.

Suggested Citation

  • Neumann, László & Boda, Dorottya, 2002. "A munkavállalói tulajdon visszaszorulása Magyarországon [The decline of employee ownership in Hungary]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(2), pages 143-157.
  • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:480
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=480
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Bank, 1996. "World Development Report 1996," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 5979.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Block, Steven A., 1999. "Agriculture and economic growth in Ethiopia: growth multipliers from a four-sector simulation model," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 20(3), pages 241-252, May.
    2. George Viksnins, 1998. "The East Asian model and the Baltic states," Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics;Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS), vol. 33(5), pages 238-244, September.
    3. Martin L. Weitzman, 1999. "Pricing the Limits to Growth from Minerals Depletion," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 114(2), pages 691-706.
    4. Azam, Jean-Paul, 1999. "Dollars for Sale: Exchange Rate Policy and Inflation in Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 27(10), pages 1843-1859, October.
    5. Amartya K. Sen, 1997. "From Income Inequality to Economic Inequality," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 384-401, October.
    6. Shah, Anwar, 1998. "Balance, accountability, and responsiveness : lessons about decentralization," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2021, The World Bank.
    7. Gerry Redmond & Sylke Schnepf & Marc Suhrcke, 2002. "Attitudes to Inequality after Ten Years of Transition," Papers inwopa02/21, Innocenti Working Papers.
    8. Kox, Henk L.M., 1998. "Welfare gains from liberalized banana trade and a new international banana agreement," Serie Research Memoranda 0012, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    9. Norman Myers, 1997. "Consumption in relation to population, environment and development," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 33-44, March.
    10. John Beirne & Nauro F. Campos, 2007. "Educational inputs and outcomes before the transition from communism," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 15(1), pages 57-76, January.
    11. Laurila, Juhani & Singh, Rupinder, 2000. "Sequential reform strategy: The case of Azerbaijan," BOFIT Discussion Papers 8/2000, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    12. Nam, Ilchong & Oh, Soogeun, 2000. "Bankruptcy of Large Firms and Exit Mechanisms in Korea," KDI Research Monographs, Korea Development Institute (KDI), volume 127, number 200001.
    13. Timothy Hinks, 2012. "Fractionalization and well-being: Evidence from a new South African data set," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(3), pages 253-271, December.
    14. Radmilo Pesic & Diana Urge-Vorsatz, 2001. "Restructuring of the Hungarian Electricity Industry," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 85-99.
    15. Bob Sutcliffe & Andrew Glyn, 2019. "Measures of globalisation and their misinterpretation," Chapters, in: Jonathan Michie (ed.), The Handbook of Globalisation, Third Edition, chapter 4, pages 77-90, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    16. Athar Hussain & Juzhong Zhuang, 1997. "Chinese State Enterprises and their Reform," Asia Pacific Business Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 20-37, March.
    17. Basudeb Chaudhuri, 2001. "Les réformes économiques indiennes. Éléments de bilan," Revue Tiers Monde, Programme National Persée, vol. 42(165), pages 17-31.
    18. Herok, Claudia A. & Lotze, Hermann, 2000. "Implications of an EU Eastern Enlargement Under a New Common Agricultural Policy," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 661-690, November.
    19. Petersson, Lennart, 2000. "The Theory of New Economic Geography and Industrial Location in SADC," Working Papers 2000:6, Lund University, Department of Economics.
    20. Kon, Anita, 1996. "Service industries and service economy," Textos para discussão 63, FGV EESP - Escola de Economia de São Paulo, Fundação Getulio Vargas (Brazil).

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • L33 - Industrial Organization - - Nonprofit Organizations and Public Enterprise - - - Comparison of Public and Private Enterprise and Nonprofit Institutions; Privatization; Contracting Out
    • P31 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Socialist Institutions and Their Transitions - - - Socialist Enterprises and Their Transitions

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Odon Sok to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.