IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1787.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Elszámolóházak alapbiztosítéki követelményeinek számítási módszertana
[Numerical methodology in the basic insurance requirements of clearing houses]

Author

Listed:
  • Váradi, Kata
  • Ladoniczki, Sára Kata

Abstract

A 2008-as válságot követően számos olyan jogszabály született, amelyeknek célja a pénzügyi rendszer stabilitásának biztosítása és transzparenciájának növelése. A válság kitörésének egyik oka ugyanis a nem megfelelő szabályozói környezet volt, hiszen a globálisan jelentős méretű pénzügyi szereplők OTC-derivatívákban hatalmas értékű spekulatív tőkeáttételes pozíciókat halmoztak fel, amelyeken jelentős veszteségek gyűltek össze. Ezeknek az ügyleteknek a szabályozatlansága súlyosbította a válság elmélyülését. Erre válaszként született meg az Egyesült Államokban a Dodd-Frank Act, valamint az Európai Unió piaci szabályozása, a European Market Infrastructure Regulation (EMIR), amelyek hatására a központi szerződő felek jelentősége megnőtt a pénzügyi piacokon. Tanulmányunk célja, hogy bemutassuk néhány európai központi szerződő fél alapbiztosíték-számítási módszertanát az EMIR-szabályozás fényében. Ismertetjük az egyes módszertanok előnyeit, illetve hátrányait különböző szempontok alapján. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: G15, G17, G18.

Suggested Citation

  • Váradi, Kata & Ladoniczki, Sára Kata, 2018. "Elszámolóházak alapbiztosítéki követelményeinek számítási módszertana [Numerical methodology in the basic insurance requirements of clearing houses]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(7), pages 780-809.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1787
    DOI: 10.18414/KSZ.2018.7-8.780
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1787
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.18414/KSZ.2018.7-8.780?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Péter Csóka & P. Jean-Jacques Herings, 2018. "Decentralized Clearing in Financial Networks," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(10), pages 4681-4699, October.
    2. Markus K. Brunnermeier & Lasse Heje Pedersen, 2009. "Market Liquidity and Funding Liquidity," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 22(6), pages 2201-2238, June.
    3. Berlinger, Edina & Váradi, Kata & Dömötör, Barbara & Illés, Ferenc, 2016. "A tőzsdei elszámolóházak vesztesége [The loss from central clearing houses]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 993-1010.
    4. Rama Cont, 2017. "Central clearing and risk transformation," Working Paper 2017/3, Norges Bank.
    5. Caspers, Peter & Giltinan, Paul & Lichters, Roland & Nowaczyk, Nikolai, 2017. "Forecasting initial margin requirements: A model evaluation," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 10(4), pages 365-394, October.
    6. Krahnen, Jan Pieter & Pelizzon, Loriana, 2016. ""Predatory" margins and the regulation and supervision of central counterparty clearing houses (CCPs)," SAFE White Paper Series 41, Leibniz Institute for Financial Research SAFE.
    7. Darrell Duffie, 2010. "Presidential Address: Asset Price Dynamics with Slow‐Moving Capital," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 65(4), pages 1237-1267, August.
    8. Yajun Wang, 2016. "Why Can Margin Requirements Increase Volatility and Benefit Margin Constrained Investors?," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 20(4), pages 1449-1485.
    9. Nikil Chande & Nicholas Labelle, 2016. "Using Speed and Credit Limits to Address the Procyclicality of Initial Margin at Central Counterparties," Discussion Papers 16-18, Bank of Canada.
    10. Ferris, Stephen P. & Chance, Don M., 1988. "Margin requirements and stock market volatility," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 251-254.
    11. Murphy, David & Vasios, Michalis & Vause, Nicholas, 2016. "A comparative analysis of tools to limit the procyclicality of initial margin requirements," Bank of England working papers 597, Bank of England.
    12. Moran, Lee & Wilkens, Sascha, 2017. "Capturing initial margin in counterparty risk calculations," Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 10(2), pages 118-129, April.
    13. Mr. John Kiff & Ms. Jennifer A. Elliott & Mr. Elias G. Kazarian & Ms. Jodi G Scarlata & Carolyne Spackman, 2009. "Credit Derivatives: Systemic Risks and Policy Options?," IMF Working Papers 2009/254, International Monetary Fund.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berlinger, Edina & Dömötör, Barbara & Illés, Ferenc, 2019. "Anti-cyclical versus risk-sensitive margin strategies in central clearing," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 117-131.
    2. Kryzanowski, Lawrence & Perrakis, Stylianos & Zhong, Rui, 2021. "Financial oligopolies and parallel exclusion in the credit default swap markets," Journal of Financial Markets, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    3. Grothe, Magdalena & Pancost, N. Aaron & Tompaidis, Stathis, 2023. "Collateral competition: Evidence from central counterparties," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 149(3), pages 536-556.
    4. Abbassi, Puriya & Iyer, Rajkamal & Peydró, José-Luis & Tous, Francesc R., 2016. "Securities trading by banks and credit supply: Micro-evidence from the crisis," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(3), pages 569-594.
    5. Zhiguo He & Arvind Krishnamurthy, 2013. "Intermediary Asset Pricing," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 103(2), pages 732-770, April.
    6. He, Zhiguo & Kelly, Bryan & Manela, Asaf, 2017. "Intermediary asset pricing: New evidence from many asset classes," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(1), pages 1-35.
    7. Valentin Haddad & Alan Moreira & Tyler Muir, 2021. "When Selling Becomes Viral: Disruptions in Debt Markets in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Fed’s Response [Funding value adjustments]," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 34(11), pages 5309-5351.
    8. Lewis, Kurt F. & Longstaff, Francis A. & Petrasek, Lubomir, 2021. "Asset mispricing," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(3), pages 981-1006.
    9. Berlinger, Edina & Váradi, Kata & Dömötör, Barbara & Illés, Ferenc, 2016. "A tőzsdei elszámolóházak vesztesége [The loss from central clearing houses]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(9), pages 993-1010.
    10. Vayanos, Dimitri & Wang, Jiang, 2013. "Market Liquidity—Theory and Empirical Evidence ," Handbook of the Economics of Finance, in: G.M. Constantinides & M. Harris & R. M. Stulz (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1289-1361, Elsevier.
    11. Ben-Rephael, Azi, 2017. "Flight-to-liquidity, market uncertainty, and the actions of mutual fund investors," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 30-44.
    12. Rubia, Antonio & Sanchis-Marco, Lidia & Serrano, Pedro, 2016. "Market frictions and the pricing of sovereign credit default swaps," Journal of International Money and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 223-252.
    13. Yanxi Li & Siu Kai Choy & Mingzhu Wang, 2022. "The potential built‐in supply effect from margin trading in the Chinese stock market," The Financial Review, Eastern Finance Association, vol. 57(4), pages 835-861, November.
    14. Iyer, Rajkamal & Peydró, José-Luis & Abbassi, Puriya & Tous, Francesc, 2015. "Securities Trading by Banks and Credit Supply: Micro-Evidence," CEPR Discussion Papers 10480, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    15. Corradin, Stefano & Heider, Florian & Hoerova, Marie, 2017. "On collateral: implications for financial stability and monetary policy," Working Paper Series 2107, European Central Bank.
    16. Liao, Gordon Y., 2020. "Credit migration and covered interest rate parity," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 504-525.
    17. Hanson, Samuel G. & Sunderam, Adi, 2013. "Are there too many safe securities? Securitization and the incentives for information production," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(3), pages 565-584.
    18. Thiago De Oliveira Souza, 2013. "Discount Rates, Market Frictions and the Mystery of the Size Premium," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2013-43, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    19. Antonio Falato & Ali Hortaçsu & Dan Li & Chaehee Shin, 2021. "Fire‐Sale Spillovers in Debt Markets," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 76(6), pages 3055-3102, December.
    20. Cristina Cella & Andrew Ellul & Mariassunta Giannetti, 2013. "Investors' Horizons and the Amplification of Market Shocks," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 26(7), pages 1607-1648.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets
    • G17 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Financial Forecasting and Simulation
    • G18 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Government Policy and Regulation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1787. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.