IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ksa/szemle/1477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Magyarország a nemzetközi innovációs versenyben az EU-csatlakozás után
[Hungary s relative R+D+I performance in the EU - 10 years after its accession]

Author

Listed:
  • Török, Ádám
  • Csuka, Gyöngyi

Abstract

A 2000-es évek eleje óta az EU pozíciói lassan romlottak a nemzetközi innovációs versenyben, és ugyanez mondható el Magyarországról is. A folyamat mögött részben a gyorsan iparosodó fejlődő országok egy részének a gyors kutatás-fejlesztési-innovációs (K + F + I) felzárkózása áll, részben pedig Európa nemzeti innovációs rendszereinek viszonylag lassú intézményi fejlődése. A relatív európai lemaradás magyarázatára gyakran alkalmazott "európai paradoxon" jelenség azonban módszertani okok miatt nem egyértelmű. Az EU-n belüli, elsősorban a közös forrásokért folytatott K + F + I-versenyben pedig - különösen a jó pályázati teljesítményeknek köszönhetően - az EU-csatlakozás óta nem romlottak a magyar pozíciók. Journal of Economic Literature (JEL) kód: F15, I28, O30, O38.

Suggested Citation

  • Török, Ádám & Csuka, Gyöngyi, 2014. "Magyarország a nemzetközi innovációs versenyben az EU-csatlakozás után [Hungary s relative R+D+I performance in the EU - 10 years after its accession]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 509-526.
    • Handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.kszemle.hu/tartalom/letoltes.php?id=1477
    Download Restriction: Registration and subscription. 3-month embargo period to non-subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gao, Xia & Guo, Xiaochuan & Sylvan, Katz J. & Guan, Jiancheng, 2010. "The Chinese innovation system during economic transition: A scale-independent view," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 618-628.
    2. Takuji Hara, 2003. "Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 2780.
    3. Calderini, Mario & Franzoni, Chiara & Vezzulli, Andrea, 2007. "If star scientists do not patent: The effect of productivity, basicness and impact on the decision to patent in the academic world," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 303-319, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Santiago-Rodriguez, Fernando, 2008. "Facing the Trial of Internationalizing Clinical Trials to Developing Countries: Some Evidence from Mexico," MERIT Working Papers 2008-023, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    2. Cornelia Lawson, 2013. "Academic Inventions Outside the University: Investigating Patent Ownership in the UK," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(5), pages 385-398, July.
    3. Aldo Geuna & Alessandro Muscio, 2008. "The governance of University knowledge transfer," SPRU Working Paper Series 173, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    4. Freel, Mark & Persaud, Ajax & Chamberlin, Tyler, 2019. "Faculty ideals and universities' third mission," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 10-21.
    5. Linde Colen & René Belderbos & Stijn Kelchtermans & Bart Leten, 2024. "Many are called, few are chosen: the role of science in drug development decisions," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 492-517, April.
    6. Arnaud Costinot & Dave Donaldson & Margaret Kyle & Heidi Williams, 2019. "The More We Die, The More We Sell? A Simple Test of the Home-Market Effect," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 134(2), pages 843-894.
    7. Forti, Enrico & Franzoni, Chiara & Sobrero, Maurizio, 2013. "Bridges or isolates? Investigating the social networks of academic inventors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(8), pages 1378-1388.
    8. Kox, Henk L.M., 2022. "Revisiting the knowledge-capital model of foreign direct investment: New multi-country evidence," MPRA Paper 114559, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 14 Sep 2022.
    9. Stefan Houweling & Sven Wolff, 2020. "The influence of scientific prestige and peer effects on the intention to create university spin-offs," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 1432-1450, October.
    10. Muscio, Alessandro & Quaglione, Davide & Scarpinato, Michele, 2012. "The effects of universities' proximity to industrial districts on university–industry collaboration," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 639-650.
    11. Yuan-Cheih Chang & Phil Yihsing Yang & Tung-Fei Tsai-Lin & Hui-Ru Chi, 2011. "How University Departmens respond to the Rise of Academic Entrepreneurship? The Pasteur's Quadrant Explanation," DRUID Working Papers 11-07, DRUID, Copenhagen Business School, Department of Industrial Economics and Strategy/Aalborg University, Department of Business Studies.
    12. Sylvan Katz, 2012. "Science Policy, Complex Innovation Systems and Performance Measures," SPRU Working Paper Series 198, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Kai Xu & Bart Bossink & Qiang Chen, 2019. "Efficiency Evaluation of Regional Sustainable Innovation in China: A Slack-Based Measure (SBM) Model with Undesirable Outputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Gideon D. Markman & Donald S. Siegel & Mike Wright, 2008. "Research and Technology Commercialization," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1401-1423, December.
    15. Monica Plechero & Cristina Chaminade, 2016. "The role of regional sectoral specialisation on the geography of innovation networks: a comparison between firms located in regions in developed and emerging economies," International Journal of Technological Learning, Innovation and Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 148-171.
    16. Elena Zukauskaite & Michaela Trippl & Monica Plechero, 2017. "Institutional Thickness Revisited," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(4), pages 325-345, August.
    17. Jorge V. P鲥z-Rodr z & Beatriz G. L. Valcarcel, 2012. "Do product innovation and news about the R&D process produce large price changes and overreaction? The case of pharmaceutical stock prices," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(17), pages 2217-2229, June.
    18. Reiko Aoki & Tomoko Saiki, 2005. "Implications of Product Patents : Lessons from Japan," Hi-Stat Discussion Paper Series d05-85, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. Ardito, Lorenzo & Natalicchio, Angelo & Appio, Francesco Paolo & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2021. "The role of scientific knowledge within inventing teams and the moderating effects of team internationalization and team experience: Empirical tests into the aerospace sector," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 701-710.
    20. Wang, Gangbo & Guan, Jiancheng, 2010. "The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China's nanotechnology," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 338-350.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • I28 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Government Policy
    • O30 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - General
    • O38 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ksa:szemle:1477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Odon Sok (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.kszemle.hu .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.