IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/theord/v42y1997i1p53-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The undecidability of the spatialized prisoner's dilemma

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick Grim

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick Grim, 1997. "The undecidability of the spatialized prisoner's dilemma," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 53-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:42:y:1997:i:1:p:53-80
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1004959623042
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1004959623042
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1004959623042?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Salatino, Saverio & Di Gregorio, Salvatore, 2015. "A cellular model of prisoners dilemma for “prodding gratuity”," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 255(C), pages 214-227.
    2. Chris Fields & James F. Glazebrook, 2024. "Nash Equilibria and Undecidability in Generic Physical Interactions—A Free Energy Perspective," Games, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Brinca, Pedro, 2005. "Are Kant's categorical imperative and instrumental rationality incompatible? The case for the prisoner's dilemma," MPRA Paper 62133, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Louis Anthony (Tony) Cox, Jr., 2012. "Community Resilience and Decision Theory Challenges for Catastrophic Events," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(11), pages 1919-1934, November.
    5. Louis Anthony Cox, 2020. "Answerable and Unanswerable Questions in Risk Analysis with Open‐World Novelty," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2144-2177, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:42:y:1997:i:1:p:53-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.