IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/revaec/v10y1997i2p27-45.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

In Defense of Fundamental Analysis: A Critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis

Author

Listed:
  • Shostak, Frank

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Shostak, Frank, 1997. "In Defense of Fundamental Analysis: A Critique of the Efficient Market Hypothesis," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 27-45.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:10:y:1997:i:2:p:27-45
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0889-3047/contents
    File Function: link to full text
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gabriel Druta & Laura Raisa Milos, 2022. "Importance of Fundamental Analysis in the Market Valuation of the Medical Sector. Evidence from a Developed Stock Market," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 873-881, September.
    2. Paulo L. dos Santos, 2012. "Option pricing models," Chapters, in: Jan Toporowski & Jo Michell (ed.), Handbook of Critical Issues in Finance, chapter 35, pages i-ii, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Campos Dias de Sousa, Ricardo Emanuel & Howden, David, 2015. "The Efficient Market Conjecture," MPRA Paper 79792, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Lukáš Kovanda, 2014. "Will the Financial Crisis Become a Milestone in the Development of Methodology of Economics? [Stane se finanční krize milníkem v metodologii ekonomie?]," Acta Oeconomica Pragensia, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(4), pages 16-29.
    5. Abounoori, Esmaiel & Shahrazi, Mahdi & Rasekhi, Saeed, 2012. "An investigation of Forex market efficiency based on detrended fluctuation analysis: A case study for Iran," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(11), pages 3170-3179.
    6. DIMA, Bogdan & DIMA, Ştefana Maria & IOAN, Roxana, 2021. "Remarks on the behaviour of financial market efficiency during the COVID-19 pandemic. The case of VIX," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:revaec:v:10:y:1997:i:2:p:27-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.