IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/porgrv/v22y2022i2d10.1007_s11115-022-00618-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Hassan Danaeefard

    (Tarbiat Modares University(TMU))

  • Fatemeh Mahdizadeh

    (Tarbiat Modares University(TMU))

Abstract

The purpose of this scoping review is to describe studies focusing on policy diffusion to elicit an overall picture of the research in this field. Although various journals have published articles on policy diffusion, the top journals in public policy and public administration have been studied in this article. Out of 2900 cited articles, 52 articles that met the criteria were finally selected. Findings indicate learning and imitation mechanisms in the diffusion process compared to other mechanisms are more attractive. Finally, the areas of need for further study in the field of policy diffusion are suggested.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassan Danaeefard & Fatemeh Mahdizadeh, 2022. "Public Policy Diffusion: A Scoping Review," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 455-477, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11115-022-00618-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s11115-022-00618-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11115-022-00618-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11115-022-00618-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Canon, Bradley C. & Baum, Lawrence, 1981. "Patterns of Adoption of Tort Law Innovations: An Application of Diffusion Theory to Judicial Doctrines," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 75(4), pages 975-987, December.
    2. Gray, Virginia, 1973. "Innovation in the States: A Diffusion Study," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(4), pages 1174-1185, December.
    3. Daniel M. Butler & Craig Volden & Adam M. Dynes & Boris Shor, 2017. "Ideology, Learning, and Policy Diffusion: Experimental Evidence," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 37-49, January.
    4. Marlene Kammerer & Chandreyee Namhata, 2018. "What drives the adoption of climate change mitigation policy? A dynamic network approach to policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 51(4), pages 477-513, December.
    5. Walker, Jack L., 1969. "The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 880-899, November.
    6. Jay Barth & Janine Parry, 2009. "Political Culture, Public Opinion, and Policy (Non)Diffusion: The Case of Gay‐ and Lesbian‐Related Issues in Arkansas," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(2), pages 309-325, June.
    7. Denisa Gandara & Jennifer A. Rippner & Erik C. Ness, 2017. "Exploring the ‘How’ in Policy Diffusion: National Intermediary Organizations’ Roles in Facilitating the Spread of Performance-Based Funding Policies in the States," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(5), pages 701-725, September.
    8. Patrik Marier, 2017. "The politics of policy adoption: a saga on the difficulties of enacting policy diffusion or transfer across industrialized countries," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 50(3), pages 427-448, September.
    9. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    10. Thomas Richter & Stefan Wurster, 2016. "Policy Diffusion among Democracies and Autocracies: A Comparison of Trade Reforms and Nuclear Energy Policy," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(4), pages 541-547, November.
    11. Gregory S. Burge & Cynthia L. Rogers, 2016. "Leaders, Followers, And Asymmetric Local Tax Policy Diffusion," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 313-331, March.
    12. Walker, Jack L., 1969. "The Diffusion of Innovations among the American States," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(3), pages 880-899, November.
    13. Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2008. "The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 840-857, October.
    14. Grupp, Fred W. & Richards, Alan R., 1975. "Variations in Elite Perceptions of American States as Referents for Public Policy Making," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 69(3), pages 850-858, September.
    15. Maggetti, Martino & Gilardi, Fabrizio, 2016. "Problems (and solutions) in the measurement of policy diffusion mechanisms," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 87-107, March.
    16. Berry, Frances Stokes & Berry, William D., 1990. "State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis," American Political Science Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 84(2), pages 395-415, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaohan Li & Yang Lv & Md Nazirul Islam Sarker & Xun Zeng, 2022. "Assessment of Critical Diffusion Factors of Public–Private Partnership and Social Policy: Evidence from Mainland Prefecture-Level Cities in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Evan M. Mistur & John Wagner Givens & Daniel C. Matisoff, 2023. "Contagious COVID‐19 policies: Policy diffusion during times of crisis," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(1), pages 36-62, January.
    3. Suk Joon Hwang & Frances Berry, 2019. "Deterring Drunk Driving: Why Some States Go Further Than Others in Policy Innovation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Felix Strebel & Thomas Widmer, 2012. "Visibility and facticity in policy diffusion: going beyond the prevailing binarity," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 385-398, December.
    5. Weixing Liu & Hongtao Yi, 2020. "What Affects the Diffusion of New Energy Vehicles Financial Subsidy Policy? Evidence from Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Kaveh Rashidi & Anthony Patt, 2018. "Subsistence over symbolism: the role of transnational municipal networks on cities’ climate policy innovation and adoption," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 507-523, April.
    7. Armin Mertens & Christine Trampusch & Florian Fastenrath & Rebecca Wangemann, 2021. "The political economy of local government financialization and the role of policy diffusion," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(2), pages 370-387, April.
    8. Strebel, Felix, 2011. "Inter-governmental institutions as promoters of energy policy diffusion in a federal setting," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 467-476, January.
    9. Fabrizio Gilardi, 2010. "Who Learns from What in Policy Diffusion Processes?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(3), pages 650-666, July.
    10. Jolley, G. Jason, 2023. "The Political Economy of Local Government Enterprise Zone Designation," Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, Mid-Continent Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), September.
    11. Derek Glasgow & Shuang Zhao & Saatvika Rai, 2021. "Rethinking Climate Change Leadership: An Analysis of the Ambitiousness of State GHG Targets," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(4), pages 398-426, July.
    12. Ramona S. McNeal & Caroline J. Tolbert & Karen Mossberger & Lisa J. Dotterweich, 2003. "Innovating in Digital Government in the American States," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 84(1), pages 52-70, March.
    13. Fix Michael P. & Mitchell Joshua L., 2017. "Examining the Policy Learning Dynamics of Atypical Policies with an Application to State Preemption of Local Dog Laws," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 8(2), pages 223-247, December.
    14. Nico Heiden & Felix Strebel, 2012. "What about non-diffusion? The effect of competitiveness in policy-comparative diffusion research," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 45(4), pages 345-358, December.
    15. Charles R. Shipan & Craig Volden, 2008. "The Mechanisms of Policy Diffusion," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 52(4), pages 840-857, October.
    16. Brian Y. An & Adam Butz & Min-Kyeong Cha & Joshua L. Mitchell, 2023. "Following neighbors or regional leaders? Unpacking the effect of geographic proximity in local climate policy diffusion," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 825-868, December.
    17. Amy Y. Li, 2017. "Covet Thy Neighbor or “Reverse Policy Diffusion”? State Adoption of Performance Funding 2.0," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 58(7), pages 746-771, November.
    18. Valente, Thomas W. & Pitts, Stephanie & Wipfli, Heather & Vega Yon, George G., 2019. "Network influences on policy implementation: Evidence from a global health treaty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 188-197.
    19. Jäkel Tim, 2019. "Performance Gaps, Peer Effects, and Comparative Behaviour: Empirical Evidence from Swedish Local Government," Statistics, Politics and Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 27-53, June.
    20. Saatvika Rai, 2020. "Policy Adoption and Policy Intensity: Emergence of Climate Adaptation Planning in U.S. States," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 37(4), pages 444-463, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:porgrv:v:22:y:2022:i:2:d:10.1007_s11115-022-00618-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.