IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v38y2019i3d10.1007_s11113-019-09517-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimating Abortion Incidence: Assessment of a Widely Used Indirect Method

Author

Listed:
  • Susheela Singh

    (Guttmacher Institute)

  • Fatima Juarez

    (Guttmacher Institute
    El Colegio de México)

  • Elena Prada

    (Independent Consultant)

  • Akinrinola Bankole

    (Guttmacher Institute)

Abstract

Induced abortion is a reproductive behavior that remains difficult to measure in countries where the procedure is highly restricted by law. Additionally, in some countries where abortion is broadly legal, a high proportion of abortions are carried out by illegal and untrained providers. In these contexts, official statistics are non-existent or highly incomplete. Measurement of the incidence of induced abortion is essential to inform sexual and reproductive health policies and programs. Researchers have developed diverse methodologies over the years. Direct methods, such as population-based surveys that ask women about their abortion experience, generally are subject to high levels of underreporting. A range of indirect methods have been developed to obtain more accurate estimates. Created in the early 1990s, the Abortion Incidence Complications Method (AICM) is a widely applied indirect method that has produced robust estimates of abortion incidence in a range of contexts. This paper presents the original AICM methodology used in countries where abortion is highly restricted. It also highlights modifications made for two situations, one of which is newly emerging. First, the methodology has been adapted recently for countries where, despite the restrictive abortion laws, a new, relatively safe method—medication abortion (mainly misoprostol alone)—is increasingly used. Second, it has been adapted for countries where abortion is broadly legal but unsafe abortion remains common. The paper also assesses performance of the methodology to the extent available data permit. The paper provides guidance to researchers who want to conduct abortion incidence studies using the AICM and to further advance the measurement of abortion incidence.

Suggested Citation

  • Susheela Singh & Fatima Juarez & Elena Prada & Akinrinola Bankole, 2019. "Estimating Abortion Incidence: Assessment of a Widely Used Indirect Method," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(3), pages 429-458, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:38:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09517-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-019-09517-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-019-09517-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-019-09517-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rossier, Clémentine & Guiella, George & Ouédraogo, Abdoulaye & Thiéba, Blandine, 2006. "Estimating clandestine abortion with the confidants method--results from Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 254-266, January.
    2. Yeatman, S. & Trinitapoli, J., 2011. "Best-friend reports: A tool for measuring the prevalence of sensitive behaviors," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 101(9), pages 1666-1667.
    3. Lakhwinder Singh & Sukhpal Singh, 2014. "Introduction," Millennial Asia, , vol. 5(2), pages 127-128, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pejchinovska, Marija & Alexander, Monica, 2023. "A Bayesian framework to account for misclassification error and uncertainty in the estimation of abortion incidence," SocArXiv uz8ev, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suzanne O. Bell & Mary E. Fissell, 2021. "A Little Bit Pregnant? Productive Ambiguity and Fertility Research," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 47(2), pages 505-526, June.
    2. Roch Millogo & Clémentine Rossier, 2022. "Fertility Transition in Dakar, Nairobi, and Ouagadougou Since the 1970s: An Identical Reduction at All Ages Through Modern Contraception?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(5), pages 2115-2142, October.
    3. Laura Lindberg & Kathryn Kost & Isaac Maddow-Zimet & Sheila Desai & Mia Zolna, 2020. "Abortion Reporting in the United States: An Assessment of Three National Fertility Surveys," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 57(3), pages 899-925, June.
    4. Alex Armand & Britta Augsburg & Antonella Bancalari, 2021. "Coordination and the poor maintenance trap: an experiment on public infrastructure in India," IFS Working Papers W21/16, Institute for Fiscal Studies.
    5. Carsten Butsch & Shreya Chakraborty & Sharlene L. Gomes & Shamita Kumar & Leon M. Hermans, 2021. "Changing Hydrosocial Cycles in Periurban India," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Rafael Cortez & Diana Bowser & Meaghen Quinlan-Davidson & Haidara Ousmane Diadie, 2015. "Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health in Burkina Faso," World Bank Publications - Reports 21627, The World Bank Group.
    7. Clémentine Rossier, 2007. "Attitudes towards abortion and contraception in rural and urban Burkina Faso," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 17(2), pages 23-58.
    8. Seydou Drabo, 2019. "A Pill in the Lifeworld of Women in Burkina Faso: Can Misoprostol Reframe the Meaning of Abortion," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Abiodun O. Jegede & Grietje Zeeman & Harry Bruning, 2019. "Effect of Mixing Regimes on Cow Manure Digestion in Impeller Mixed, Unmixed and Chinese Dome Digesters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-14, July.
    10. Coast, Ernestina & Murray, Susan F., 2016. "“These things are dangerous”: Understanding induced abortion trajectories in urban Zambia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 201-209.
    11. Pejchinovska, Marija & Alexander, Monica, 2023. "A Bayesian framework to account for misclassification error and uncertainty in the estimation of abortion incidence," SocArXiv uz8ev, Center for Open Science.
    12. Parmar, Divya & Leone, Tiziana & Coast, Ernestina & Murray, Susan Fairley & Hukin, Eleanor & Vwalika, Bellington, 2017. "Cost of abortions in Zambia: a comparison of safe abortion and post abortion care," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 63643, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Suh, Siri, 2014. "Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 20-33.
    14. S Subramanian, 2018. "Participation of rural households in farm, non-farm and pluri-activity: Evidences from India," Working Papers 412, Institute for Social and Economic Change, Bangalore.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:38:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s11113-019-09517-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.