IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v4y2002i4d10.1007_s101090200091.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conjoint modeling of residential group preferences: A comparison of the internal validity of hierarchical information integration approaches

Author

Listed:
  • Eric J.E. Molin

    (Assistant Professor of Transport Policy, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands (e-mail: e.j.e.molin@tbm.tudelft.nl))

  • Harmen Oppewal

    (Professor of Marketing, Department of Marketing, Monash University, Australia)

  • Harry J.P. Timmermans

    (Professor of Urban Planning, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands)

Abstract

. In this paper, two approaches for measuring residential group preferences, based on the method of Hierarchical Information Integration (HII), are compared. In particular, the hypothesis that group-based preference models estimated from integrated HII experiments better predict group preferences than part individual-based group models estimated from classical HII experiments is tested. To that effect, the models' ability to predict group preferences for new residential alternatives is compared in a study of residential preferences of co-ops. Results indicate that integrated HII group experiments indeed result in better predictions of residential preferences.

Suggested Citation

  • Eric J.E. Molin & Harmen Oppewal & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2002. "Conjoint modeling of residential group preferences: A comparison of the internal validity of hierarchical information integration approaches," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 4(4), pages 343-358, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:4:y:2002:i:4:d:10.1007_s101090200091
    DOI: 10.1007/s101090200091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s101090200091
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s101090200091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chinh Ho & Corinne Mulley, 2015. "Intra-household interactions in transport research: a review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 33-55, January.
    2. Matthew J. Beck & John M. Rose, 2019. "Stated preference modelling of intra-household decisions: Can you more easily approximate the preference space?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 1195-1213, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:4:y:2002:i:4:d:10.1007_s101090200091. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.