IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v69y2006i4p373-387.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicting Views of Markets and Economic Justice: Implications for Student Learning

Author

Listed:
  • David Carrithers
  • Dean Peterson

Abstract

This paper describes a flaw in the teaching of issues related to market economics and social justice at American institutions of higher learning. The flaw we speak of is really a gap, or an educational disconnect, which exists between those faculty who support market-based economies and those who believe capitalism promotes economic injustice. The thesis of this paper is that the gap is so wide and the ideas that are promoted are so disconnected that students are trapped into choosing one or the other position (or neither) and are left unable to link the two sides of the discussion. Such an educational process is not one that produces free and reasoned discernment. In this paper, we briefly relate how we came to be aware of the disconnect and its harms. We present evidence that a pedagogical gulf exists within the teaching of markets and capitalism at American universities – faculty interviews, course syllabi, portions of the corpus of material generally referred to as Catholic Social Thought, as well as references to traditional, mainstream economic theory. Further, we give evidence of the confusion and frustration among students this gulf causes. We suggest possible reasons for the gulf–primarily through an investigation of the differences in underlying assumptions and misperceptions that exist between two divisions within universities. We conclude by suggesting a set of curricular changes designed to improve teaching. The authors’ aim is not to change people’s minds. It is to change their teaching. The authors believe that these curricular changes will leave students less frustrated and better prepared for a life of significant service – with improved critical thinking skills. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Suggested Citation

  • David Carrithers & Dean Peterson, 2006. "Conflicting Views of Markets and Economic Justice: Implications for Student Learning," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 373-387, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:69:y:2006:i:4:p:373-387
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9096-3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9096-3
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9096-3?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Colander, 2003. "Integrating Sex and Drugs into the Principles Course: Market-Failures Versus Failures-of-Market Outcomes," The Journal of Economic Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(1), pages 82-91, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Marc A. Cohen & Dean Peterson, 2019. "The Implicit Morality of the Market and Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 75-88, September.
    2. Mukesh Srivastava, 2014. "Profiling Sustainability Curriculum in AACSB Schools," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frooman, Jeff, 2021. "Where MLM Intersects MFA: Morally Suspect Goods and the Grounds for Regulatory Action," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 138-161, January.
    2. Green, Tom L., 2013. "Teaching (un)sustainability? University sustainability commitments and student experiences of introductory economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 135-142.
    3. A. Arrighetti & A. Lasagni, 2018. "Insegnare Economia Industriale ‘in a digital age’," Economics Department Working Papers 2018-EP06, Department of Economics, Parma University (Italy).
    4. Marc A. Cohen & Dean Peterson, 2019. "The Implicit Morality of the Market and Joseph Heath’s Market Failures Approach to Business Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 75-88, September.
    5. Gwendolyn Alexander Tedeschi, 2007. "Drug Markets: A Classroom Experiment," The American Economist, Sage Publications, vol. 51(1), pages 75-84, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:69:y:2006:i:4:p:373-387. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.