IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v69y2006i1p1-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Intellectual Property Rights and Chinese Tradition Section: Philosophical Foundations

Author

Listed:
  • John Lehman

Abstract

Western attempts to obtain Chinese compliance with intellectual property rights have a long history of failure. Most discussions of the problem focus on either legal comparisons or explanations arising from levels of economic development (based primarily on the example of U.S. disregard for such rights during the 18th and 19th centuries). After decades of heated negotiation, intellectual property rights is still one of the major issues of misunderstanding between the West and the various Chinese political entities. This paper examines the sources of this problem from the standpoint of traditional Chinese social and political philosophy (specifically Neo-Confucianism). It points out that the basic assumptions about the nature of intellectual property, which arose during the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe, are fundamentally at odds with the traditional Chinese view of the role of intellectuals in society. It suggests that policies which do not take these differences into account, but which attempt to transfer Western legal concepts without the underlying social constructs are responsible for much of the lack of success in the area of intellectual property rights. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Suggested Citation

  • John Lehman, 2006. "Intellectual Property Rights and Chinese Tradition Section: Philosophical Foundations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(1), pages 1-9, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:69:y:2006:i:1:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9059-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-006-9059-8
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-006-9059-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Orozco & Latha Poonamallee, 2014. "The Role of Ethics in the Commercialization of Indigenous Knowledge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(2), pages 275-286, January.
    2. Xu Sun & Xiaosong Zhou & Qingfeng Wang & Pinyan Tang & Effie Lai-Chong Law & Sue Cobb, 2021. "Understanding attitudes towards intellectual property from the perspective of design professionals," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 521-543, June.
    3. Betty Yung, 2009. "Reflecting on the Common Discourse on Piracy and Intellectual Property Rights: A Divergent Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 87(1), pages 45-57, June.
    4. Qingfeng Wang & Xu Sun, 2019. "Exploring Chinese Design Business Owners’ Attitudes Towards Intellectual Property Rights," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 23(06), pages 1-24, August.
    5. Cao, Qing, 2014. "Insight into weak enforcement of intellectual property rights in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 40-47.
    6. David Ackerman & Jing Hu & Liyuan Wei, 2009. "Confucius, Cars, and Big Government: Impact of Government Involvement in Business on Consumer Perceptions Under Confucianism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 88(3), pages 473-482, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:69:y:2006:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.