IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jbuset/v112y2013i2p341-352.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason for Managerial Decision-Making

Author

Listed:
  • Chad Kleist

Abstract

This article will offer an alternative understanding of managerial decision-making drawing from Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason rather than simply Being and Nothingness. I will begin with a brief explanation of Sartre’s account of freedom in Being and Nothingness. I will then show in the second section how Andrew West uses Sartre’s conception of radical freedom from Being and Nothingness for a managerial decision-making model. In the third section, I will explore a more robust account of freedom from Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason. I will attempt to show that freedom is not simply a matter of choosing (or not choosing) to perform an action, but entails external constraints—including other people. Finally, I will provide the implications of this account of freedom for managerial decision-making. I will show that it’s unreasonable to place full responsibility and/or blame on managers given their constraints. This does not absolve them from responsibility, but better accounts for the way in which we ought to hold them responsible. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2013

Suggested Citation

  • Chad Kleist, 2013. "Using Sartre’s Critique of Dialectical Reason for Managerial Decision-Making," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 341-352, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:112:y:2013:i:2:p:341-352
    DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1266-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10551-012-1266-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10551-012-1266-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew West, 2008. "Sartrean Existentialism and Ethical Decision-Making in Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(1), pages 15-25, August.
    2. Mahon, John F. & McGowan, Richard A., 1991. "Searching for the common good: A process-oriented approach," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 79-86.
    3. Sigmund Wagner-Tsukamoto, 2007. "Moral Agency, Profits and the Firm: Economic Revisions to the Friedman Theorem," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 70(2), pages 209-220, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helet Botha & R. Edward Freeman, 2023. "Existentialist Perspectives on the Problem and Prevention of Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 499-511, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stimel, Derek & Sekerka, Leslie E., 2018. "Play fair! Innovating internal self-regulation in the market for profit," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 115-124.
    2. repec:hal:journl:hal-00823521 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Ignacio Ferrero & W. Michael Hoffman & Robert E. McNulty, 2012. "Must Milton Friedman Embrace Stakeholder Theory?," Faculty Working Papers 10/12, School of Economics and Business Administration, University of Navarra.
    4. Nafisa Yeasmin & Timo Koivurova, 2019. "A factual analysis of sustainable opportunity recognition of immigrant entrepreneurship in Finnish Lapland: Theories and practice," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 15(2), pages 57-84.
    5. Marjo Elisa Siltaoja, 2014. "Revising the Corporate Social Performance Model – Towards Knowledge Creation for Sustainable Development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(5), pages 289-302, July.
    6. Petya Puncheva-Michelotti & Marco Michelotti & Peter Gahan, 2010. "The Relationship Between Individuals’ Recognition of Human Rights and Responses to Socially Responsible Companies: Evidence from Russia and Bulgaria," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 583-605, June.
    7. Teraji, Shinji, 2009. "A model of corporate social performance: Social satisfaction and moral conduct," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 38(6), pages 926-934, December.
    8. Shantha Indrajith H. Liyanage & Fulu Godfrey Netswera & Abel Motsumi, 2021. "Insights from EU Policy Framework in Aligning Sustainable Finance for Sustainable Development in Africa and Asia," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(1), pages 459-470.
    9. Stephen Schweinsberg & David Fennell, 2023. "Space Tourism: A Historical and Existential Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Helet Botha & R. Edward Freeman, 2023. "Existentialist Perspectives on the Problem and Prevention of Moral Disengagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 185(3), pages 499-511, July.
    11. Gabriel CHELARIU, 2017. "The Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: A Quantitative Analysis For Companies in Romania," North Economic Review, Technical University of Cluj Napoca, Department of Economics and Physics, vol. 1(1), pages 179-185, October.
    12. Wagner-Tsukamoto Sigmund, 2013. "The Adam Smith Problem Revisited: A Methodological Resolution," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 19(1), pages 63-99, September.
    13. Martin Schlag & Domènec Melé, 2020. "Building Institutions for the Common Good. The Practice and Purpose of Business in an Inclusive Economy," Humanistic Management Journal, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-6, July.
    14. Vranceanu , Radu, 2013. "Corporate Profit, Entrepreneurship Theory and Business Ethics," ESSEC Working Papers WP1308, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    15. Argandoña, Antonio, 2009. "The common good of the company and the theory of organization," IESE Research Papers D/777, IESE Business School.
    16. Cheng-Wen Lee & Mao-Wen Fu, 2024. "Conceptualizing Sustainable Business Models Aligning with Corporate Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-31, June.
    17. Mike Bull & Rory Ridley-Duff, 2019. "Towards an Appreciation of Ethics in Social Enterprise Business Models," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(3), pages 619-634, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:112:y:2013:i:2:p:341-352. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.