IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v3y1997i3p299-31110.1007-bf02294916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Planting flexibility: Implications for agricultural sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Parveen Setia
  • Bengt Hyberg
  • Daniel Ugarte
  • Daryll Ray

Abstract

There is a general belief that federal commodity programs restrict adoption of more sustainable production systems. In the 1990 farm legislation, Congress introduced limited planting flexibility to address these concerns and to reduce federal farm program costs. This program estimates the impact of planting flexibility on selected agricultural sustainability indicators and its policy implications. Results show that planting flexibility is a necessary but not sufficient condition for implementing more sustainable production systems. Other factors such as the availability of economically viable alternatives, macroeconomic conditions, and local resource and environmental concerns need to be considered. Policy reforms can help in achieving economic and environmental gains only in locations with economically viable alternatives. In other cases, increased research and development of new systems are needed to achieve desired results. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 1997

Suggested Citation

  • Parveen Setia & Bengt Hyberg & Daniel Ugarte & Daryll Ray, 1997. "Planting flexibility: Implications for agricultural sustainability," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 3(3), pages 299-311, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:3:y:1997:i:3:p:299-311:10.1007/bf02294916
    DOI: 10.1007/BF02294916
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF02294916
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF02294916?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richardson, James W. & Smith, Edward G. & Knutson, Ronald D. & Outlaw, Joe L., 1991. "Farm Level Impacts of Reduced Chemical Use on Southern Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 27-37, July.
    2. Taylor, C. Robert & Penson, John B. & Smith, Edward G. & Knutson, Ronald D., 1991. "Economic Impacts of Chemical Use Reduction on the South," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 23(1), pages 15-23, July.
    3. Hertel, Thomas W., 1988. "Gainers and Losers with Supply Control: An Economywide Perspective," Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 3(4), pages 1-4.
    4. Tobey, James A. & Reinert, Kenneth A., 1991. "The Effects of Domestic Agricultural Policy Reform on Environmental Quality," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 43(2), pages 1-9.
    5. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Lee, Linda K., 1987. "The Magnitude And Costs Of Groundwater Contamination From Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective," Staff Reports 277938, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Sun, Henglun & Bergstrom, John C. & Dorfman, Jeffrey H., 1992. "Estimating the Benefits of Groundwater Contamination Control," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 63-71, December.
    7. Paul C. Westcott, 1991. "Planting Flexibility and Land Allocation," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 73(4), pages 1105-1115.
    8. Nielsen, Elizabeth G. & Lee, Linda K., 1987. "The Magnitude and Costs of Groundwater Contamination from Agricultural Chemicals: A National Perspective," Agricultural Economic Reports 308032, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    9. Taylor, C. Robert & Penson, John B., Jr. & Smith, Edward G. & Knutson, Ronald D., 1991. "Economic Impacts Of Chemical Use Reduction On The South," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 1-9, July.
    10. Painter, Kathleen M. & Young, Douglas L., 1994. "Environmental and Economic Impacts of Agricultural Policy Reform: An Interregional Comparison," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(2), pages 451-462, December.
    11. Pollack, Susan L. & Lynch, Lori & [editors], 1991. "Provisions of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309577, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    12. Gregory M. Perry & Bruce A. McCarl & M. Edward Rister & James W. Richardson, 1989. "Modeling Government Program Participation Decisions at the Farm Level," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 71(4), pages 1011-1020.
    13. Painter, Kathleen M. & Young, Douglas L., 1994. "Environmental And Economic Impacts Of Agricultural Policy Reform: An Interregional Comparison," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 26(2), pages 1-12, December.
    14. Patricia A. Duffy & C. Robert Taylor, 1994. "Effects on a Corn-Soybean Farm of Uncertainty about the Future of Farm Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 76(1), pages 141-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chowdhury, Manzoor E. & Lacewell, Ronald D., 1996. "Implications Of Alternative Policies On Nitrate Contamination Of Groundwater," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 21(1), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Archer, David W. & Shogren, Jason F., 1996. "Endogenous risk in weed control management," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 103-122, July.
    3. Thomas, Arthur C. & Boisvert, Richard N., 1995. "The Bioeconomics Of Regulating Nitrates In Groundwater From Agricultural Production Through Taxes, Quantity Restrictions, And Pollution Permits," Research Bulletins 122999, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Peterson, Jeffrey M. & Boisvert, Richard N., 1998. "Optimal Voluntary "Green" Payment Programs To Limit Nitrate Contamination Under Price and Yield Risk," Research Bulletins 122687, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    5. Daberkow, Stan, 1987. "Agricultural Input Industry Indicators in 1974-85: Expansion and Contraction," Agricultural Information Bulletins 309404, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Vasavada, Utpal & Saint-Louis, Robert & Debailleul, Guy, 1990. "The Conflict Between Trade Policy and Environmental Policy in Agriculture," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50879, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    7. Crutchfield, Stephen R. & Brazee, Richard J., 1990. "An Integrated Model of Surface and Ground Water Quality," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271011, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. Reichelderfer, Katherine H., 1989. "Water quality legislation affecting agriculture," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326615, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    9. Mapp, Harry P., Jr., 1988. "Irrigated Agriculture On The High Plains: An Uncertain Future," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 13(2), pages 1-9, December.
    10. Bennett, Anne L. & Pannell, David J., 1998. "Economic evaluation of a weed-activated sprayer for herbicide application to patchy weed populations," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 42(4), pages 1-20.
    11. Dumper, Thomas A., 1989. "Magnitude and extent of water quality problems in the United States," Agricultural Outlook Forum Archive 1923 - 1997 326614, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    12. Ayer, Harry W., 0. "Agriculture And Groundwater Quality: The Arizona Experience," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.
    13. Babcock, Bruce A. & Pautsch, Gregory R., 1998. "Moving From Uniform To Variable Fertilizer Rates On Iowa Corn: Effects On Rates And Returns," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-16, December.
    14. Carriker, Gordon L., 1993. "Factor Input Demand Subject to Economic and Environmental Risk: The Case of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Corn Production," Staff Papers 118154, Kansas State University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Ragona, Maddalena & Mazzocchi, Mario, 2008. "Measuring the Impacts of Food Safety Regulations: A Methodological Review," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43864, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Ribaudo, Marc O. & Colacicco, Daniel & Langner, Linda L. & Piper, Steven & Schaible, Glenn D., 1990. "Natural Resources and Users Benefit from the Conservation Reserve Program," Agricultural Economic Reports 308085, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Bor, Yunchang Jeffrey, 1997. "Some evidence for the existence of dynamic economic thresholds," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 53(2-3), pages 143-160.
    18. Archer, David Walter, 1995. "Self-insurance and self-protection in weed control: implications for nonpoint source pollution," ISU General Staff Papers 1995010108000012033, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    19. Diebel, Penelope & Taylor, Daniel & Batie, Sandra, 1991. "Low-Input Agriculture as a Groundwater Protection Strategy," WAEA/ WFEA Conference Archive (1929-1995) 321457, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    20. Abdalla, Charles W., 0. "Agriculture And Ground Water Quality: Challenges And Opportunities For Public Policy Education," Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies, Farm Foundation.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:3:y:1997:i:3:p:299-311:10.1007/bf02294916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.