IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/iaecre/v21y2015i1p41-5410.1007-s11294-014-9512-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Is the most innovative firm in the world really innovative?

Author

Listed:
  • Jiří Mihola
  • Petr Wawrosz
  • Jana Kotěšovcová

Abstract

The essence of knowledge economics is a permanent innovation process and the implementation of intense development factors. Decision-making about innovation is strategic and crucial. It is thus useful to have a sufficiently universal, practicable, and clear analysis of how successful a particular innovation is. Our paper suggests a method for evaluating process and organizational innovation which does not require a great amount of input information, only data about company costs and revenues, which are, at least for the company management, easily accessible. The outputs of the method are the values of the dynamic parameter of intensity and the dynamic parameter of extensity. The first one evaluates the share of change in intensive factors on a firm’s development, whereas the second one fulfils the same function for change in extensive factors. The sum of both parameters equals 1, or 100 % in percentage terms. The parameters are able to describe all possible types of firm development, which are summarized in the paper. The proposed methodology is applied to Nike, whose performance is compared to six other prominent, innovative U.S. companies (Amazon, Apple, Coca Cola, Google, Ford Motor Company, and Target). Our analysis, however, shows that the development of most of them is based on extensive factors. The most intensive firm is the Ford Motor Company, where growth in intensive factors offsets and even outweighs the decline in extensive factors. Copyright International Atlantic Economic Society 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Jiří Mihola & Petr Wawrosz & Jana Kotěšovcová, 2015. "Is the most innovative firm in the world really innovative?," International Advances in Economic Research, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 41-54, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:41-54:10.1007/s11294-014-9512-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11294-014-9512-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11294-014-9512-x
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11294-014-9512-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. LeBel, Phillip, 2008. "The role of creative innovation in economic growth: Some international comparisons," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(4), pages 334-347, August.
    2. Pierre Therrien & Petr Hanel, 2011. "Innovation and Productivity: Summary Results for Canadian Manufacturing Establishments," International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards, vol. 22, pages 11-28, Fall.
    3. Chang, Chia-Lin & Oxley, Les, 2009. "Industrial agglomeration, geographic innovation and total factor productivity: The case of Taiwan," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 2787-2796.
    4. Minna Saunila & Juhani Ukko, 2013. "Facilitating innovation capability through performance measurement," Management Research Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 36(10), pages 991-1010, September.
    5. Christine Greenhalgh & Mark Rogers, 2010. "Innovation, Intellectual Property, and Economic Growth," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 0, number 9221.
    6. Jan Čadil, 2007. "Growth Accounting, Total Factor Productivity and Approximation Problem," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2007(4), pages 347-357.
    7. Barro, Robert J, 1999. "Notes on Growth Accounting," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 119-137, June.
    8. David Audretsch, 2004. "Sustaining Innovation and Growth: Public Policy Support for Entrepreneurship," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 167-191.
    9. Mojmír Hájek & Jiří Mihola, 2009. "Analýza vlivu souhrnné produktivity faktorů na ekonomický růst České republiky [Analysis of Total Factor Productivity Contribution to Economic Growth of the Czech Republic]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2009(6), pages 740-753.
    10. David J. Teece & Gary Pisano & Amy Shuen, 1997. "Dynamic capabilities and strategic management," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 509-533, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eram Abbasi & Imran Amin & Shama Siddiqui, 2022. "Towards developing innovation management framework (IMF) for ICT organizations at Pakistan," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liao, Tung-Shan & Rice, John, 2010. "Innovation investments, market engagement and financial performance: A study among Australian manufacturing SMEs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 117-125, February.
    2. Ghayth Tahat, 2021. "Innovation Management to Sustain Competitive Advantage: A Qualitative Multi-Case Study," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 12(2), pages 107-132, December.
    3. Jiří Mihola & Petr Wawrosz, 2014. "Alternativní metoda měření extenzivních a intenzivních faktorů změny HDP a její aplikace na vývoj HDP USA a Číny [An Alternative Method How to Measure Impact of the Intensive and Extensive Factors ," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2014(5), pages 583-604.
    4. Grashof, Nils, 2020. "Putting the watering can away Towards a targeted (problem-oriented) cluster policy framework," Papers in Innovation Studies 2020/4, Lund University, CIRCLE - Centre for Innovation Research.
    5. Belso-Martinez, Jose A. & Molina-Morales, F. Xavier & Mas-Verdu, Francisco, 2013. "Combining effects of internal resources, entrepreneur characteristics and KIS on new firms," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 2079-2089.
    6. Swen Nadkarni & Reinhard Prügl, 2021. "Digital transformation: a review, synthesis and opportunities for future research," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 71(2), pages 233-341, April.
    7. Kibaek Lee & Jaeheung Yoo & Munkee Choi & Hangjung Zo & Andrew P Ciganek, 2016. "Does External Knowledge Sourcing Enhance Market Performance? Evidence from the Korean Manufacturing Industry," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    8. Panagiotis Trivellas & Georgios Malindretos & Panagiotis Reklitis, 2020. "Implications of Green Logistics Management on Sustainable Business and Supply Chain Performance: Evidence from a Survey in the Greek Agri-Food Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-29, December.
    9. Jiatong Yu & Jiajue Wang & Taesoo Moon, 2022. "Influence of Digital Transformation Capability on Operational Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    10. Chinho Lin & Ming-Lung Hsu & David C. Yen & Ping-Jung Hsieh & Hua-Ling Tsai & Tsung-Hsien Kuo, 2013. "Prototype system for pursuing firm’s core capability," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 497-509, July.
    11. Chin‐jung Luan & Chengli Tien & Pei‐hua Wu, 2013. "Strategizing Environmental Policy and Compliance for Firm Economic Sustainability: Evidence from Taiwanese Electronics Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(8), pages 517-546, December.
    12. Adrian Gourlay & Jonathan Seaton, 2004. "The determinants of firm diversification in UK quoted companies," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(18), pages 2059-2071.
    13. John A. Parnell, 2017. "Cronyism from the Perspective of the Firm: A Cross-National Assessment of Nonmarket Strategy," Journal of Private Enterprise, The Association of Private Enterprise Education, vol. 32(Fall 2017), pages 47-74.
    14. Abiodun Tope Samson, 2015. "The Impact of Entrepreneurial Orientation, Reconfiguring Capability and Moderation of Environmental Turbulence on Export Performance of SMEs in Nigeria," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 7(3), pages 76-87.
    15. Piñeiro-Chousa, Juan & López-Cabarcos, M. Ángeles & Romero-Castro, Noelia María & Pérez-Pico, Ada María, 2020. "Innovation, entrepreneurship and knowledge in the business scientific field: Mapping the research front," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 475-485.
    16. Zhao, Jun & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Baldwin, Carliss Y. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M. & Kapoor, Rahul & West, Joel, 2024. "Focusing the ecosystem lens on innovation studies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    18. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    19. Filippo Carlo Wezel & Gino Cattani & Johannes M. Pennings, 2006. "Competitive Implications of Interfirm Mobility," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(6), pages 691-709, December.
    20. Christiana Müller & Stefan Vorbach, 2015. "Enabling Business Model Change: Evidence from High-Technology Firms," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 11(1), pages 53-75.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Company productivity; Efficiency; Process and organizational innovation; Intensity; Extensity; G30; M21; O10; O40; C33;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • G30 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance - - - General
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • O10 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - General
    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • C33 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models; Multiple Variables - - - Models with Panel Data; Spatio-temporal Models

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:iaecre:v:21:y:2015:i:1:p:41-54:10.1007/s11294-014-9512-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.