IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/hcarem/v12y2009i2p129-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient mix optimisation and stochastic resource requirements: A case study in cardiothoracic surgery planning

Author

Listed:
  • Ivo Adan
  • Jos Bekkers
  • Nico Dellaert
  • Jan Vissers
  • Xiaoting Yu

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivo Adan & Jos Bekkers & Nico Dellaert & Jan Vissers & Xiaoting Yu, 2009. "Patient mix optimisation and stochastic resource requirements: A case study in cardiothoracic surgery planning," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 12(2), pages 129-141, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:129-141
    DOI: 10.1007/s10729-008-9080-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10729-008-9080-9
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10729-008-9080-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kusters, Rob J. & Groot, Petra M. A., 1996. "Modelling resource availability in general hospitals design and implementation of a decision support model," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 88(3), pages 428-445, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Range, Troels Martin & Lusby, Richard Martin & Larsen, Jesper, 2014. "A column generation approach for solving the patient admission scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 235(1), pages 252-264.
    2. Ana Batista & Jorge Vera & David Pozo, 2020. "Multi-objective admission planning problem: a two-stage stochastic approach," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 51-65, March.
    3. Yang, Xiaopeng & Zheng, Danheng & Sieminowski, Tammy & Paradi, Joseph C., 2015. "A dynamic benchmarking system for assessing the recovery of inpatients: Evidence from the neurorehabilitation process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 240(2), pages 582-591.
    4. Lusby, Richard Martin & Schwierz, Martin & Range, Troels Martin & Larsen, Jesper, 2016. "An Adaptive Large Neighbourhood Search Procedure Applied to the Dynamic Patient Admission Scheduling Problem," Discussion Papers on Economics 1/2016, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    5. Vissers, Jan M.H. & Adan, Ivo J.B.F. & Dellaert, Nico P., 2007. "Developing a platform for comparison of hospital admission systems: An illustration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(3), pages 1290-1301, August.
    6. Ketelhöhn, Niels & Sanz, Luis, 2016. "Healthcare management priorities in Latin America: Framework and responses," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3835-3838.
    7. Hui Zhang & Thomas J. Best & Anton Chivu & David O. Meltzer, 2020. "Simulation-based optimization to improve hospital patient assignment to physicians and clinical units," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 117-141, March.
    8. David Oakley & Bhakti Stephan Onggo & Dave Worthington, 2020. "Symbiotic simulation for the operational management of inpatient beds: model development and validation using Δ-method," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 153-169, March.
    9. Bastos, Leonardo S.L. & Marchesi, Janaina F. & Hamacher, Silvio & Fleck, Julia L., 2019. "A mixed integer programming approach to the patient admission scheduling problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 273(3), pages 831-840.
    10. Paul Joustra & Jesse Wit & Nico Dijk & Piet Bakker, 2011. "How to juggle priorities? An interactive tool to provide quantitative support for strategic patient-mix decisions: an ophthalmology case," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 14(4), pages 348-360, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:hcarem:v:12:y:2009:i:2:p:129-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.