Lottery Incentives and Resource Management: Evidence from the Agricultural Data Reporting Incentive Program (AgDRIP)
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-022-00690-1
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2020.
"Blood donations and incentives: Evidence from a field experiment,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 52-74.
- Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2008. "Blood donations and incentives : evidence from a field experiment," Working papers 2008/05, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
- Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2019. "Blood Donations and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment," CEPR Discussion Papers 13677, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Goette, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2019. "Blood Donations and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment," Working papers 2019/20, Faculty of Business and Economics - University of Basel.
- Götte, Lorenz & Stutzer, Alois, 2008. "Blood Donations and Incentives: Evidence from a Field Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 3580, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Lorenz Goette & Alois Stutzer, 2008. "Blood donations and incentives: evidence from a field experiment," Working Papers 08-3, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
- Wolter H.J. Hassink & Pierre Koning, 2009. "Do Financial Bonuses Reduce Employee Absenteeism? Evidence from a Lottery," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 62(3), pages 327-342, April.
- Uri Gneezy & Stephan Meier & Pedro Rey-Biel, 2011. "When and Why Incentives (Don't) Work to Modify Behavior," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 25(4), pages 191-210, Fall.
- Tversky, Amos & Kahneman, Daniel, 1992. "Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty," Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 297-323, October.
- Helga Fehr-Duda & Adrian Bruhin & Thomas Epper & Renate Schubert, 2010.
"Rationality on the rise: Why relative risk aversion increases with stake size,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 40(2), pages 147-180, April.
- Helga Fehr-Duda & Adrian Bruhin & Thomas Epper & Renate Schubert, 2007. "Rationality on the Rise: Why Relative Risk Aversion Increases with Stake Size," SOI - Working Papers 0708, Socioeconomic Institute - University of Zurich, revised Feb 2008.
- Brian E. Roe, 2015. "The Risk Attitudes of U.S. Farmers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 37(4), pages 553-574.
- Marco Fabbri & Paolo Nicola Barbieri & Maria Bigoni, 2019.
"Ride Your Luck! A Field Experiment on Lottery-Based Incentives for Compliance,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(9), pages 4336-4348, September.
- M. Fabbri & P. N. Barbieri & M. Bigoni, 2016. "Ride Your Luck! A Field Experiment on Lottery-based Incentives for Compliance," Working Papers wp1089, Dipartimento Scienze Economiche, Universita' di Bologna.
- Fabbri, Marco & Nicola Barbieri, Paolo & Bigoni, Maria, 2016. "Ride Your Luck!A Field Experiment on Lotterybased Incentives for Compliance," Working Papers in Economics 678, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
- Meha Jain, 2020. "The Benefits and Pitfalls of Using Satellite Data for Causal Inference," Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 14(1), pages 157-169.
- Steven D. Levitt & John A. List & Sally Sadoff, 2016.
"The Effect of Performance-Based Incentives on Educational Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment,"
NBER Working Papers
22107, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Steven Levitt & John List & Sally Sadoff, 2016. "The Effect of Performance-Based Incentives on Educational Achievement: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment," Framed Field Experiments 00585, The Field Experiments Website.
- Laure Kuhfuss & Raphaële Préget & Sophie Thoyer & Nick Hanley, 2016.
"Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus,"
European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 43(4), pages 609-636.
- Laure Kuhfuss & Raphaële Préget & Sophie Thoyer & Nick Hanley, 2016. "Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus," Post-Print hal-01506443, HAL.
- Filiz-Ozbay, Emel & Guryan, Jonathan & Hyndman, Kyle & Kearney, Melissa & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2015.
"Do lottery payments induce savings behavior? Evidence from the lab,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-24.
- Emel Filiz-Ozbay & Jonathan Guryan & Kyle Hyndman & Melissa Schettini Kearney & Erkut Y. Ozbay, 2013. "Do Lottery Payments Induce Savings Behavior: Evidence from the Lab," NBER Working Papers 19130, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Anna Lungarska & Pierre-Alain Jayet, 2018. "Impact of Spatial Differentiation of Nitrogen Taxes on French Farms’ Compliance Costs," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(1), pages 1-21, January.
- Martina Björkman Nyqvist & Lucia Corno & Damien de Walque & Jakob Svensson, 2018.
"Incentivizing Safer Sexual Behavior: Evidence from a Lottery Experiment on HIV Prevention,"
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 10(3), pages 287-314, July.
- Björkman Nyqvist, Martina & de Walque, Damien & Corno, Lucia & Svensson, Jakob, 2016. "Incentivizing Safer Sexual Behavior: Evidence from a Lottery Experiment on HIV Prevention," CEPR Discussion Papers 11542, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1989.
"Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior,"
Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 141-153, April.
- Gilboa, Itzhak & Schmeidler, David, 1986. "Maxmin Expected Utility with a Non-Unique Prior," Foerder Institute for Economic Research Working Papers 275405, Tel-Aviv University > Foerder Institute for Economic Research.
- Itzhak Gilboa & David Schmeidler, 1989. "Maxmin Expected Utility with Non-Unique Prior," Post-Print hal-00753237, HAL.
- Johansson, Robert & Effland, Anne & Coble, Keith, 2017. "Falling Response Rates to USDA Crop Surveys: Why It Matters," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 7, January.
- Joana Naritomi, 2019.
"Consumers as Tax Auditors,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(9), pages 3031-3072, September.
- Naritomi, Joana, 2018. "Consumers as Tax Auditors," CEPR Discussion Papers 13276, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Naritomi, Joana, 2019. "Consumers as tax auditors," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 101538, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Chris Starmer, 2000. "Developments in Non-expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 38(2), pages 332-382, June.
- Garrett, Thomas A. & Sobel, Russell S., 1999. "Gamblers favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States' lottery games," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 85-90, April.
- Drazen Prelec, 1998. "The Probability Weighting Function," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 66(3), pages 497-528, May.
- Carson Reeling & Leah H. Palm-Forster & Richard T. Melstrom, 2019. "Policy Instruments and Incentives for Coordinated Habitat Conservation," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 73(3), pages 791-813, July.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luís Santos-Pinto, 2022.
"Risk and rationality: The relative importance of probability weighting and choice set dependence,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 65(2), pages 139-184, October.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2018. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 18.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2019. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.05, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2018.
"Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence,"
Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie
18.04, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2019. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.01, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Thomas Åstebro & José Mata & Luís Santos-Pinto, 2015. "Skewness seeking: risk loving, optimism or overweighting of small probabilities?," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 189-208, February.
- Adrian Bruhin & Maha Manai & Luis Santos-Pinto, 2019. "Risk and Rationality:The Relative Importance of Probability Weighting and Choice Set Dependence," Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'économie 19.01new, Université de Lausanne, Faculté des HEC, Département d’économie.
- Brice Corgnet & Roberto Hernán González, 2023. "You Will not Regret it: On the Practice of Randomized Incentives," Working Papers 2314, Groupe d'Analyse et de Théorie Economique Lyon St-Étienne (GATE Lyon St-Étienne), Université de Lyon.
- Mohammed Abdellaoui & Horst Zank, 2023. "Source and rank-dependent utility," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 75(4), pages 949-981, May.
- Fehr-Duda, Helga & Epper, Thomas & Bruhin, Adrian & Schubert, Renate, 2011.
"Risk and rationality: The effects of mood and decision rules on probability weighting,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 14-24.
- Fehr-Duda, Helga & Epper, Thomas & Bruhin, Adrian & Schubert, Renate, 2011. "Risk and rationality: The effects of mood and decision rules on probability weighting," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 78(1-2), pages 14-24, April.
- Georgalos, Konstantinos & Paya, Ivan & Peel, David A., 2021. "On the contribution of the Markowitz model of utility to explain risky choice in experimental research," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 527-543.
- Laurent Denant-Boemont & Olivier L’Haridon, 2013.
"La rationalité à l'épreuve de l'économie comportementale,"
Revue française d'économie, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(2), pages 35-89.
- Laurent Denant-Boèmont & Olivier l'Haridon, 2013. "La rationalité à l’épreuve de l’économie comportementale," Economics Working Paper Archive (University of Rennes & University of Caen) 201323, Center for Research in Economics and Management (CREM), University of Rennes, University of Caen and CNRS.
- Laurent Denant-Boèmont & Olivier L’haridon, 2013. "La rationalité à l'épreuve de l'économie comportementale," Post-Print halshs-00921070, HAL.
- Mark Schneider, 2018. "A Dual System Model of Risk and Time Preferences," Working Papers 18-18, Chapman University, Economic Science Institute.
- Ranoua Bouchouicha & Ferdinand M. Vieider, 2017.
"Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-28, August.
- Ranoua Bouchouicha & Ferdinand Vieider, 2016. "Accommodating Stake Effects under Prospect Theory," Economics Discussion Papers em-dp2016-03, Department of Economics, University of Reading.
- Mark Schneider & Robert Day, 2018. "Target-Adjusted Utility Functions and Expected-Utility Paradoxes," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(1), pages 271-287, January.
- Golo-Friedrich Bauermeister & Daniel Hermann & Oliver Musshoff, 2018. "Consistency of determined risk attitudes and probability weightings across different elicitation methods," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 627-644, June.
- Filiz-Ozbay, Emel & Guryan, Jonathan & Hyndman, Kyle & Kearney, Melissa & Ozbay, Erkut Y., 2015.
"Do lottery payments induce savings behavior? Evidence from the lab,"
Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 1-24.
- Emel Filiz-Ozbay & Jonathan Guryan & Kyle Hyndman & Melissa Schettini Kearney & Erkut Y. Ozbay, 2013. "Do Lottery Payments Induce Savings Behavior: Evidence from the Lab," NBER Working Papers 19130, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Simone Cerreia‐Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2015.
"Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect,"
Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 83, pages 693-728, March.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2013. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," PIER Working Paper Archive 13-037, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro Ortoleva, 2014. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," PIER Working Paper Archive 14-005, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
- Simone Cerreia-Vioglio & David Dillenberger & Pietro ortoleva, 2013. "Cautious Expected Utility and the Certainty Effect," Working Papers 488, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
- Foster, Gigi & Frijters, Paul & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2018.
"Expectation formation in an evolving game of uncertainty: New experimental evidence,"
Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 379-405.
- Foster, Gigi & Frijters, Paul & Schaffner, Markus & Torgler, Benno, 2018. "Expectation formation in an evolving game of uncertainty: new experimental evidence," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 90087, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Bocqueho, Geraldine & Jacquet, Florence & Reynaud, Arnaud, 2011. "Expected Utility or Prospect Theory Maximizers? Results from a Structural Model based on Field-experiment Data," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114257, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
- Luís Santos-Pinto & Adrian Bruhin & José Mata & Thomas Åstebro, 2015.
"Detecting heterogeneous risk attitudes with mixed gambles,"
Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 79(4), pages 573-600, December.
- Astebro , Thomas & Santos-Pinto , Luís, 2014. "Detecting Heterogeneous Risk Attitudes with Mixed Gambles," HEC Research Papers Series 1042, HEC Paris.
- Enrico Diecidue & Peter Wakker & Marcel Zeelenberg, 2007.
"Eliciting decision weights by adapting de Finetti’s betting-odds method to prospect theory,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 179-199, June.
- Diecidue, E. & Wakker, P.P. & Zeelenberg, M., 2007. "Eliciting decision weights by adapting de Finetti's betting-odds method to prospect theory," Other publications TiSEM ac35645a-7772-46fe-ba31-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
- Thomas Epper & Helga Fehr-Duda & Adrian Bruhin, 2011.
"Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting,"
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 169-203, December.
- Thomas Epper & Helga Fehr-Duda & Adrian Bruhin, 2010. "Viewing the future through a warped lens: Why uncertainty generates hyperbolic discounting," IEW - Working Papers 510, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics - University of Zurich.
More about this item
Keywords
Citizen science; Field experiment; Lottery incentives; Randomized controlled trial; Resource management;All these keywords.
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:82:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s10640-022-00690-1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.