IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/enreec/v4y1994i6p535-544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Efficient introduction of Pigovian taxes

Author

Listed:
  • Franz Wirl

Abstract

This paper considers the dynamics of introducing pollution taxes when firms have to invest into abatement facilities. This accumulation of abatement capital, however, proceeds sluggishly. Therefore, actual policy proposals of pollution taxes consider a phased introduction. This paper considers the normative aspects of such a policy. More precisely, it proves that pollution taxes should be introduced radically rather than gradually. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Suggested Citation

  • Franz Wirl, 1994. "Efficient introduction of Pigovian taxes," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 4(6), pages 535-544, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:4:y:1994:i:6:p:535-544
    DOI: 10.1007/BF00693044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/BF00693044
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF00693044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ko, Il-Dong & Lapan, Harvey E. & Sandler, Todd, 1992. "Controlling stock externalities : Flexible versus inflexible Pigovian corrections," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1263-1276, August.
    2. Pindyck, Robert S., 1982. "The optimal phasing of phased deregulation," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 281-294, November.
    3. Wirl, Franz, 1991. "Phasing of Deregulation: Normative versus Positive Objectives," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 89-106, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Moghaddam, Hussein & Wirl, Franz, 2018. "Determinants of oil price subsidies in oil and gas exporting countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 409-420.
    2. Goyal, Srishti & Llop, Maria, 2024. "The shipping industry under the EU Green Deal: An Input-Output impact analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    3. Tauer, Loren W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1990. "Optimal Agricultural Policy with Biotechnology: Bovine Somatotropin and the Dairy Sector," Staff Papers 121536, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    4. Karp, Larry & STEFANOU, SPIRO, 1991. "Polish Agriculture in Transition: Does it Hurt to be Slapped by an Invisible Hand?," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt1vt3c57h, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    5. Raghbendra Jha & John Whalley, 2001. "The Environmental Regime in Developing Countries," NBER Chapters, in: Behavioral and Distributional Effects of Environmental Policy, pages 217-250, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Ana Espínola-Arredondo & Félix Muñoz-Garcia & Jude Bayham, 2014. "The Entry-Deterring Effects of Inflexible Regulation," Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 47(1), pages 298-324, February.
    7. Greiner, Romy & Cacho, Oscar, 2001. "On the efficient use of a catchment's land and water resources: dryland salinization in Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 441-458, September.
    8. Dominique Prunetti, 1998. "Taxation dynamique dans le cadre d'une industrie polluante concurrentielle et de deux variables de contrôle," Revue d'Économie Industrielle, Programme National Persée, vol. 83(1), pages 167-181.
    9. Gaston Giordana & Marc Willinger, 2013. "Fixed instruments to cope with stock externalities: an experimental evaluation," Chapters, in: John A. List & Michael K. Price (ed.), Handbook on Experimental Economics and the Environment, chapter 13, pages 367-403, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Farmer, Amy & Kahn, James R. & McDonald, Judith A. & O'Neill, Robert, 2001. "Rethinking the optimal level of environmental quality: justifications for strict environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 461-473, March.
    11. Franz Wirl, 1990. "Optimal introduction of Time-of-Day tariffs in the presence of consumer adjustment costs," Journal of Economics, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 259-271, October.
    12. Kjell Holmåker & Thomas Sterner, 1999. "Growth or environmental concern: which comes first? Optimal control with pure stock pollutants," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(3), pages 167-185, September.
    13. Tauer, Loren W. & Kaiser, Harry M., 1989. "Optimal Government Policy In Response To Bovine Somatotropin," 1989 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 270658, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Karp, Larry & Stefanou, Spiro, 1991. "Polish Agriculture in Transition: Does it Hurt to be Slapped by an Invisible Hand?," CUDARE Working Papers 198594, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    15. Kjell Holmåker & Thomas Sterner, 1999. "Growth or environmental concern: which comes first? Optimal control with pure stock pollutants," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 2(3), pages 167-185, September.
    16. Denis Claude & Charles Figuières & Mabel Tidball, 2012. "Regulation of Investments in Infrastructure: The Interplay between Strategic Behaviors and Initial Endowments," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 14(1), pages 35-66, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:enreec:v:4:y:1994:i:6:p:535-544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.