IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/ecopln/v57y2024i6d10.1007_s10644-024-09835-2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The green transformation effect of foreign patent applications in China: evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Yuegang Song

    (Henan Normal University)

  • Ziqi Wang

    (Henan Normal University)

  • Yuzhen Yang

    (Henan Normal University)

Abstract

The spillover of foreign patent technology in China and the consequent green transformation of manufacturing enterprises are pivotal factors for the country to achieve sustainable economic development. This study utilizes matched data from the patent database of the China National Intellectual Property Administration, database of Chinese industrial enterprises, and database of pollution emission of Chinese enterprises from 1998 to 2013 to investigate the impact and mechanism of foreign patent applications on the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises. Furthermore, this study constructs a spatial weight matrix of forward and backward industrial linkages to explore the spatial influence of foreign patent applications in China with regard to green transformation through inter-industry spillover effects. Research findings: first, as per the results of the mechanism analysis, foreign patent applications in China can drive the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises through the ‘scale effect’ and ‘technology spillover effect’; moreover, its effect is influenced by the absorption capacity of enterprises and the strength of environmental regulation. Second, the results of heterogeneity analysis demonstrate that the green transformation effect of foreign patent applications in China is more significant in non-foreign-capital, heavy pollution, central and western, general trade and high market competition manufacturing enterprises. Third, foreign patent applications in China can promote the direct green transformation of this industry and the indirect green transformation of other industries through forward spillover and backward spillover of industrial linkage; the effect of backward spillover is more prominent. This study expands the research context and theoretical connotation of the green transformation of the manufacturing enterprises and provides inspiration and reference for the green transformation of manufacturing enterprises under the goal of ‘peak carbon dioxide emissions’ and ‘carbon neutrality’.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuegang Song & Ziqi Wang & Yuzhen Yang, 2024. "The green transformation effect of foreign patent applications in China: evidence from Chinese manufacturing enterprises," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-44, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:57:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10644-024-09835-2
    DOI: 10.1007/s10644-024-09835-2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10644-024-09835-2
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10644-024-09835-2?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christian Fons-Rosen & Sebnem Kalemli-Ozcan & Bent E. Sørensen & Carolina Villegas-Sánchez & Vadym Volosovych, 2017. "Foreign Investment and Domestic Productivity: Identifying Knowledge Spillovers and Competition Effects," Working Papers 986, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Ghisetti, Claudia & Marzucchi, Alberto & Montresor, Sandro, 2015. "The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 1080-1093.
    3. Ang, James B., 2009. "CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2658-2665, August.
    4. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 17-45, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Bart Los & Bart Verspagen, 2002. "An Introduction to the Analysis of Systems of Innovation: Scientific and Technological Interdependencies," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 315-322, December.
    6. Yibing Li & Xuejiao Geng, 2024. "Analyzing the role of mergers and acquisitions and environmental investment in achieving energy transition and sustainability," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1-27, June.
    7. Li Yao & Minyan Jin, 2024. "Retraction Note: Impacts of green taxation on the green transformation of manufacturing industry: an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 1-1, December.
    8. Wolff, Edward N. & Ishaq Nadiri, M., 1993. "Spillover effects, linkage structure, and research and development," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 4(2), pages 315-331, December.
    9. Li Yao & Minyan Jin, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Impacts of green taxation on the green transformation of manufacturing industry: an empirical analysis based on Chinese provincial panel data," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(1), pages 1-27, February.
    10. Bart Verspagen, 1997. "Measuring Intersectoral Technology Spillovers: Estimates from the European and US Patent Office Databases," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(1), pages 47-65.
    11. Caiyun Lin & Shibao Lu & Xuyang Su & Chuanhao Wen, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Can the greening of the tax system improve enterprises’ ESG performance? Evidence from China," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 1-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Valeria Costantini & Francesco Crespi & Giovanni Marin & Elena Paglialunga, 2016. "Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries," LEM Papers Series 2016/19, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.
    2. Christoph Meister & Bart Verspagen & Guntram B. Wolff, 2006. "European Productivity Gaps: Is R&D the Solution?," Chapters, in: Susanne Mundschenk & Michael H. Stierle & Ulrike Stierle-von Schütz & Iulia Traistaru-Siedschlag (ed.), Competitiveness and Growth in Europe, chapter 8, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. G Medda & C. Piga, 2004. "R&S e spillover industriali: un'analisi sulle imprese italiane," Working Paper CRENoS 200406, Centre for North South Economic Research, University of Cagliari and Sassari, Sardinia.
    4. Mitze, Timo & Naveed, Amjad & Ahmad, Nisar, 2016. "International, intersectoral, or unobservable? Measuring R&D spillovers under weak and strong cross-sectional dependence," Journal of Macroeconomics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 259-272.
    5. ten Raa, Thijs & Wolff, Edward N., 2000. "Engines of growth in the US economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 473-489, December.
    6. Jun Koo, 2006. "In Search of New Knowledge: Its Origins and Destinations," Economic Development Quarterly, , vol. 20(3), pages 259-277, August.
    7. Mauro Caminati & Arsenio Stabile, 2010. "The Pattern Of Knowledge Flows Between Technology Fields," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(2), pages 364-397, May.
    8. Aldieri, Luigi & Sena, Vania & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2018. "Domestic R&D spillovers and absorptive capacity: Some evidence for US, Europe and Japan," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 38-49.
    9. Jürgen Antony & Thomas Grebel, 2012. "Technology flows between sectors and their impact on large-scale firms," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(20), pages 2637-2651, July.
    10. Ugur, Mehmet & Trushin, Eshref & Solomon, Edna & Guidi, Francesco, 2016. "R&D and productivity in OECD firms and industries: A hierarchical meta-regression analysis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 2069-2086.
    11. Antonelli, Cristiano & Krafft, Jackie & Quatraro, Francesco, 2010. "Recombinant knowledge and growth: The case of ICTs," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 50-69, March.
    12. Fulvio Castellacci, 2007. "Technological regimes and sectoral differences in productivity growth ," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 16(6), pages 1105-1145, December.
    13. Stolpe, Michael, 2001. "Mobility of research workers and knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology," Kiel Working Papers 1038, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Quatraro, Francesco & Scandura, Alessandra, 2019. "Academic Inventors and the Antecedents of Green Technologies. A Regional Analysis of Italian Patent Data," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 247-263.
    15. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Mairesse, Jacques & Mohnen, Pierre, 2010. "Measuring the Returns to R&D," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 1033-1082, Elsevier.
    16. Pellegrino, Gabriele & Piva, Mariacristina & Vivarelli, Marco, 2012. "Young firms and innovation: A microeconometric analysis," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 23(4), pages 329-340.
    17. Dieter Schumacher & Florian Straßberger, 1994. "Broadening the Scope for Reporting on the Technological Competitiveness of the Federal Republic of Germany," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 100, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    18. Piscitello, Lucia, 2000. "Relatedness and coherence in technological and product diversification of the world's largest firms," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 295-315, September.
    19. Giuseppe Medda & Claudio Piga, 2014. "Technological spillovers and productivity in Italian manufacturing firms," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 419-434, June.
    20. Barbieri, Nicolò & Marzucchi, Alberto & Rizzo, Ugo, 2020. "Knowledge sources and impacts on subsequent inventions: Do green technologies differ from non-green ones?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(2).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:57:y:2024:i:6:d:10.1007_s10644-024-09835-2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.