Author
Listed:
- Maryam Eghbal
(Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)
- Farzaneh Nassirzadeh
(Ferdowsi University of Mashhad)
- Davood Askarany
(The University of Auckland)
Abstract
This study examines the effects of non-additivity valuations on cash flows and sales growth by using the Choquet fuzzy approach as a pooled non-additive integral. The study targets 62 parent companies with 322 subsidiaries in the Tehran stock market from 2011 to 2019. The study divides firms' assets into four categories (inventories, receivables, fixed, and long-term investments). It uses the Choquet integral's properties to determine the firms' total non-additivity values. The Choquet integral approach used in this study considers the synergy of a set's componential factors in different measurements by considering and implementing the weights and coefficients of the elements. The results indicate that while the market valuation of companies (based on non-additivity valuations) has no significant correlation with their operating cash flows, it has a positive correlation with their sales growth, which could be attributed to the synergy created by the business combination of the parent companies with their subsidiaries. Moreover, the findings show a significant correlation between sales growth and the market price-to-book ratio as a simple approach to measuring a company's performance. However, the results suggest that non-additivity valuations offer a better estimation in measuring the efficiency of companies than market price-to-book ratio-based approaches. Indeed, the valuations of companies are determined based on their abilities in using their resources compared to similar companies in the same industry when they use non-additivity valuations. These findings are expected to be very helpful for potential investors and shareholders.
Suggested Citation
Maryam Eghbal & Farzaneh Nassirzadeh & Davood Askarany, 2024.
"The Relationship Between Non-additivity Valuations, Cash Flows and Sales Growth,"
Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 64(1), pages 429-459, July.
Handle:
RePEc:kap:compec:v:64:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10435-x
DOI: 10.1007/s10614-023-10435-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:64:y:2024:i:1:d:10.1007_s10614-023-10435-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.