IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/asiaeu/v16y2018i1d10.1007_s10308-017-0480-7.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Eurasian Economic Union: a challenge for EU policy towards Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Agnieszka Konopelko

    (Bialystok University of Technology)

Abstract

As a top trading partner and the foreign investor in Kazakhstan, attempting to deepen bilateral relations and review its previous policy towards Kazakhstan and the post-Soviet Central Asian region (The post-Soviet Central Asian region unites five former Soviet republics: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan) as a whole, the European Union is facing up to a new set of internal and external conditions which affects its approach to the East. One of the crucial determinants taken into account in terms of the European Union policy towards its Kazakh partner derives from the more advanced processes of Eurasian integration created by the Russian Federation. The question is whether the EU will be able to compete or complement the consistent steps of the Russian integration project and whether the EU should move beyond a trade and investment approach and place emphasis on the other strategic areas? The main research objective concentrates on the identification and examination of the relationship between political decisions and the economic ties of Kazakhstan and its main strategic partners. Considering the current geopolitical situation in Ukraine and Central Asia, the new ‘EU-Kazakhstan Enhanced Partnership and Cooperation Agreement’ will develop more areas targeted at security and stabilization issues. However, the top-down initiatives are only the legal basis of sectorial cooperation, and the intensification of bilateral relations comes from bottom-up cooperation and people-to-people contacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Agnieszka Konopelko, 2018. "Eurasian Economic Union: a challenge for EU policy towards Kazakhstan," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0480-7
    DOI: 10.1007/s10308-017-0480-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10308-017-0480-7
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10308-017-0480-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ian Manners, 2002. "Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(2), pages 235-258, June.
    2. Vinokurov, Evgeny, 2013. "EDB Eurasian Integration Yearbook 2013," MPRA Paper 61618, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Flemming Splidsboel Hansen, 2013. "Integration in the post-Soviet space," International Area Studies Review, Center for International Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, vol. 16(2), pages 142-159, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. G. M. Aubakirova & F. M. Isatayeva, 2021. "New Approaches to the Construction of a Diversified Economy: the Experience of Kazakhstan," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 32(6), pages 712-718, November.
    2. Christopher A. Hartwell, 2023. "In our (frozen) backyard: the Eurasian Union and regional environmental governance in the Arctic," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Nirmala Joshi & Kamala Kumari, 2019. "Understanding Central Asia’s Security and Economic Interests," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 75(1), pages 29-42, March.
    4. K. Czerewacz-Filipowicz & A. Konopelko, 2020. "Can the EAEU Deliver External Integration to Business?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(2), pages 515-528.
    5. Sebastian Krapohl & Alexandra Vasileva-Dienes, 2020. "The region that isn't: China, Russia and the failure of regional integration in Central Asia," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 347-366, September.
    6. Elen Akopova & Assiya Nursapa & Ilyas Kuderin, 2018. "Current environmental problems in member states of the Eurasian Economic Union," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 529-539, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Viggo Jakobsen, 2009. "Small States, Big Influence: The Overlooked Nordic Influence on the Civilian ESDP," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 81-102, January.
    2. Adler, Emanuel & Crawford, Beverly, 2004. "Normative Power: The European Practice of Region Building and the Case of the Euro-Mediterranean Partnership (EMP)," Institute of European Studies, Working Paper Series qt6xx6n5p4, Institute of European Studies, UC Berkeley.
    3. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:85-93 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Anna Michalski, 2013. "Europeanization of National Foreign Policy: The Case of Denmark's and Sweden's Relations with China," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 884-900, September.
    5. Armin Ibitz, 2015. "Towards a global scheme for carbon emissions reduction in aviation: China’s role in blocking the extension of the European Union’s Emissions Trading Scheme," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 113-130, June.
    6. Mehdi Abbas & Catherine Locatelli, 2019. "Interdependence as a lever for national hybridization: The EU-Russia gas trade [L’hybridation des systèmes institutionnels nationaux dans l’interdépendance. Les échanges gaziers UE-Russie]," Post-Print hal-02472141, HAL.
    7. Chris J. Bickerton & Bastien Irondelle & Anand Menon, 2011. "Security Co‐operation beyond the Nation‐State: The EU's Common Security and Defence Policy," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(1), pages 1-21, January.
    8. Aline Burni & Benedikt Erforth & Ina Friesen & Christine Hackenesch & Maximilian Hoegl & Niels Keijzer, 2022. "Who Called Team Europe? The European Union’s Development Policy Response During the First Wave of COVID-19," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(1), pages 524-539, February.
    9. Wolfgang Wagner, 2017. "Liberal Power Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(6), pages 1398-1414, November.
    10. Merran Hulse, 2014. "Actorness beyond the European Union: Comparing the International Trade Actorness of SADC and ECOWAS," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(3), pages 547-565, May.
    11. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    12. Roter Petra, 2015. "International-local Linkages in Multistakeholder Partnerships Involved in Reconciliation, Inter-communal Bridgebuilding and Confidence-building," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 21(72), pages 139-166, February.
    13. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:555-578 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mehdi Abbas & Catherine Locatelli, 2020. "National institutional systems’ hybridisation through interdependence. The case of EU-Russia gas relations," Post-Print hal-02272171, HAL.
    15. Frederik Stender & Axel Berger & Clara Brandi & Jakob Schwab, 2021. "The Trade Effects of the Economic Partnership Agreements between the European Union and the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States: Early Empirical Insights from Panel Data," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1495-1515, November.
    16. Hak Je YU & Cornelia Alexandra LINCAN & Elena-Adina VOICILĂ, 2018. "Eu – A Stronger Global Actor: New Contexts For Eu-Korean Relations," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 10(3), pages 306-325, November.
    17. Lauri Siitonen, 2022. "A normative power or fortress Europe? Normative policy coherence between the European Unionʼs development, migration, and foreign policies," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(S1), June.
    18. Jürgen Rüland, 2018. "Coping with crisis: Southeast Asian regionalism and the ideational constraints of reform," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 155-168, June.
    19. Ajaree Tavornmas & Kasira Cheeppensook, 2020. "Shaping ocean governance: a study of EU normative power on Thailand’s sustainable fisheries," International Economics and Economic Policy, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 671-685, July.
    20. Juan José Tapia-León & Emilio Galdeano-Gómez, 2020. "Normative Power Europe as an Ingroup Projection? The EU’s Response to the Arab Uprising," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-14, May.
    21. Mario Telò, 2020. "Regionalism and Global Governance: The Alternative between Power Politics and New Multilateralism," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 54(2), pages 5-34, December.
    22. Andreas Grimmel & Viktor Eszterhai, 2020. "The Belt and Road Initiative and the Development of China’s Economic Statecraft: European Attitudes and Responses," International Studies, , vol. 57(3), pages 223-239, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:asiaeu:v:16:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10308-017-0480-7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.