IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jns/jbstat/v220y2000i2p129-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Kriegsdienstverweigerung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland / Conscientious Objection in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Haberhauer Margarete

    (Statistisches Landesamt, Postfach 1141, D-24100 Kiel)

  • Maneval Helmut

    (Neubiberg/München Universität der Bundeswehr München, Fakultät für Wirtschafts- und Organisationswissenschaften, Werner-Heisenberg-Weg 39, D-85577 Neubiberg)

Abstract

As to the right and the volume of conscientious objection Germany has an exceptional position. At first this paper deals with the legal basis of conscientious objection and presents the number of applications for recognition of conscientious objection from 1958 to 1998. Then hypotheses are formulated for the analysis of conscientious objection time series. In spite of difficulties regarding operationalisation and not completely satisfying data the empirical testing produces acceptable results.

Suggested Citation

  • Haberhauer Margarete & Maneval Helmut, 2000. "Kriegsdienstverweigerung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland / Conscientious Objection in Germany," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 220(2), pages 129-146, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:220:y:2000:i:2:p:129-146
    DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-2000-0202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/jbnst-2000-0202
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1515/jbnst-2000-0202?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Bauer, Thomas K. & Bender, Stefan & Paloyo, Alfredo R. & Schmidt, Christoph M., 2012. "Evaluating the labor-market effects of compulsory military service," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 56(4), pages 814-829.
    2. Schneider Thorsten, 2003. "Wehr- und Zivildienst in Deutschland: Wer dient, wer nicht? / Basic Militaiy and Alternative Service in Germany: Who Serves, Who Doesn't?," Journal of Economics and Statistics (Jahrbuecher fuer Nationaloekonomie und Statistik), De Gruyter, vol. 223(5), pages 603-622, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jns:jbstat:v:220:y:2000:i:2:p:129-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.degruyter.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.