IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v14y2024i6p657.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Impact of CALL Tools on English Learners' Writing Skills: A Comparative Study of Errors Correction

Author

Listed:
  • Abduh Almashy
  • Abu Saleh Md Manjur Ahmed
  • Mohammad Jamshed
  • Mohd Sajid Ansari
  • Sameena Banu
  • Wahaj Unnisa Warda

Abstract

The study seeks to compare the effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Language Learning Tools (ChatGPT, Grammarly, and Google Translate) in correcting the occurrences of common errors in English as a second/foreign language (ESL/EFL) learners’ writing. An experimental design offered instructions for Class A with ChatGPT, Class B with Grammarly, Class C with Google Translate, and Class D was the control group with no exposure to any of these tools. Data were collected from texts created by the students based on pictures, both before and after the intervention. It was found that ESL/EFL learners frequently made eight distinct types of errors in their writing- spelling, punctuation, capitalization, possessive words, verb forms, subject-verb agreement, articles, and prepositions. The interventions across different classes showed that ChatGPT in Class A significantly corrected spelling, verb form, and subject-verb agreement-related errors, Grammarly in Class B excelled in correcting prepositional errors, and Google Translate in Class C effectively addressed errors in article use, capitalization, and possessives. In contrast, the control group in Class D surpassed the others in enhancing punctuation. In Class A, ChatGPT, and in Class B, Google Translate displayed enhanced effectiveness in rectifying common writing errors of ESL learners compared to Grammarly in Class B and the control group. The findings suggest that employing targeted digital tools for distinct grammatical challenges can substantially enhance learning outcomes in a language learning context.

Suggested Citation

  • Abduh Almashy & Abu Saleh Md Manjur Ahmed & Mohammad Jamshed & Mohd Sajid Ansari & Sameena Banu & Wahaj Unnisa Warda, 2024. "Analyzing the Impact of CALL Tools on English Learners' Writing Skills: A Comparative Study of Errors Correction," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(6), pages 657-657, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/26547/16446
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/26547
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:6:p:657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.