IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v14y2024i5p436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conceptualization of Morphological Roots in Arabic and English: A Contrastive Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abdalla Elkheir Elgobshawi

Abstract

This paper aimed to build a contrastive orientation of notions of morphological roots in Arabic and English. The basic question addressed in this paper is whether there exist common properties of the root in Arabic and English.Belonging to two different language families, the two languages' morphological systems are at extremes, creating challenges for interested learners and researchers. The contrastive analysis method was adopted. This analysis could provide data about the similarities and differences of the root's structure, which can be used to meet the current study's goals.A general contrast of the morphological system of the two languages was provided, focusing on the structure of the entity of the root in those languages. The roots' morphological properties were contrasted to reveal and identify differences and similarities between the two languages.Findings revealed that a root in Arabic is a general abstraction, whereas in English, it is a concrete language item. There were few instances of resemblance of morphological behavior.Exploring the similarities and differences between the two languages would provide important pedagogical implications. It could also highlight potential language learning and teaching difficulties.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdalla Elkheir Elgobshawi, 2024. "Conceptualization of Morphological Roots in Arabic and English: A Contrastive Analysis," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(5), pages 436-436, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/25402/16141
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/25402
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.