Author
Listed:
- Abu Saleh Md Manjur Ahmed
- Mohammad Jamshed
- Md Sarfaraj
- Sameena Banu
Abstract
The present study examines the efficacy of blended learning models in enhancing nursing students' proficiency in the English language. It is challenging to come across comparative studies that assess the effectiveness of blended learning models in advancing the English language skills of nurses. However, the experimental study includes five groups, and each group has gone through five different instructional models of teaching. The first experimental group received instruction through the rotation model; the second experimental group received instruction through the flex model; the third experimental group received instruction through the self-blend model; the fourth experimental group received instruction through the enriched-virtual model; and the fifth group which served as control group received instruction through the communicative language teaching approach. A total of one hundred and fifty participants were selected through random sampling from Aligarh Muslim University, India. The data were gathered using pre- and post-tests administered before and after the intervention of these models using the standardized general English test (TOFEL). The repeated measure ANOVA revealed that each group manifested significant advancement in nurses' English language skills. Nevertheless, the rotation model demonstrated superior performance in enhancing nurses' English language skills in comparison to the other groups. The findings of the study hold pedagogical significance for those who are responsible for designing curricula, developing training programs for future nurses, producing materials, and all other persons who are involved in nursing education.
Suggested Citation
Abu Saleh Md Manjur Ahmed & Mohammad Jamshed & Md Sarfaraj & Sameena Banu, 2024.
"Exploring Diverse Teaching Models for Enhancing Nursing Students' English Language Proficiency: A Blended Learning Perspective,"
World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(5), pages 182-182, September.
Handle:
RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:182
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
JEL classification:
- R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
- Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:5:p:182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.