IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v14y2024i4p215.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Beyond the Red Pen: Exploring the Impact of Language Peer Assessment Technology on the ESL/EFL Writers’ Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Sumaya Daoud
  • Elham Taha Hussein
  • Sawsan Taha
  • AbdulSalam Mohamed Al Namer

Abstract

The purpose of the current study is to investigate the influence of integrating Turnitin peer-marking feature on students’ performance in a writing task within an English course. In addition, it seeks to elucidate the students’ perspectives on their experience with the Turnitin peer-marking feature. To achieve these objectives, a quasi-experimental design was utilized to assess the impact both before (pre-test) and after (post-test) the implementation of Turnitin peer-marking feature. Following this, the participants were prompted to write reflection papers articulating their insights concerning their experience with the peer-marking feature. Employing a mixed-method design of quantitative and qualitative methods, the study endeavors to achieve a comprehensive view of the efficacy of employing technology-mediated peer review has an impact on improving students’ writing skills, and how it is perceived by the intended users.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Sumaya Daoud & Elham Taha Hussein & Sawsan Taha & AbdulSalam Mohamed Al Namer, 2024. "Beyond the Red Pen: Exploring the Impact of Language Peer Assessment Technology on the ESL/EFL Writers’ Performance," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 14(4), pages 215-215, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/25611/15889
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/25611
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mohammed Abdullah Alharbi, 2021. "Students’ Perspectives as Providers and Receivers of Peer Formative Feedback on Writing," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(2), pages 1-1, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:215. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.