IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v9y2020i3p214.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Publishing at Any Cost? The Need for the Improvement of the Quality of Scholarly Publications

Author

Listed:
  • Maria José Sá
  • Carlos Miguel Ferreira
  • Ana Isabel Santos
  • Sandro Serpa

Abstract

At a time of great dynamism among publishers of scientific publications, with the inevitability of Open Access and the ease of publishing online at low cost, it is possible to find publications with different levels of scientific respectability. In this context, the improvement of the quality of scholarly publications emerges as a critical element for publishers, authors and academic institutions, as well as for society in general. This opinion piece discusses Open Access journals with different levels of quality, focusing on the following quality-promoting measures- blacklists, author’s preparation, and institutional prevention. The analysis allows concluding that the open review will be one of the key elements in the process of clarification and promotion of the level of quality and consequent scientific respectability of each of the Journals, of the thousands currently existing, a number that is likely to increase.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria José Sá & Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa, 2020. "Publishing at Any Cost? The Need for the Improvement of the Quality of Scholarly Publications," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 9(3), pages 214-214, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:214
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/17514/10862
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/17514
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa, 2017. "The Importance of Promoting Digital Literacy in Higher Education," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(6), pages 90-93, June.
    2. Anna Severin & Nicola Low, 2019. "Readers beware! Predatory journals are infiltrating citation databases," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 64(8), pages 1123-1124, November.
    3. Bo-Christer Björk & Sari Kanto-Karvonen & J. Tuomas Harviainen, 2020. "How Frequently Are Articles in Predatory Open Access Journals Cited," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandro Serpa & Ana Isabel Santos & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2020. "Contributions of Ivan Illich to Education in a Digital Society," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 9, March.
    2. Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2017. "Challenges in the Teaching of Sociology in Higher Education. Contributions to a Discussion," Societies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-11, October.
    3. Kendall Faulkner, 2021. "Faculty Use of Open-Access Journals: A Case Study of Faculty Publications and Cited References at a California University," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Dimity Stephen, 2023. "Medical articles in questionable journals are less impactful than those in non-questionable journals but still extensively cited," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(8), pages 4509-4522, August.
    5. Christensen, Mark & Fahlevi, Heru & Indriani, Mirna & Syukur, Muhammad, 2024. "Deciding to be ignored: Why accounting scholars use dubious quality research outlets in a neocolonial context," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    6. Anna Abalkina, 2021. "Detecting a network of hijacked journals by its archive," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 7123-7148, August.
    7. Libor Ansorge, 2023. "The right to reject an unwanted citations: do we need it?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 4147-4150, July.
    8. Ana Isabel Santos & Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Maria José Sá & Sandro Serpa, 2019. "Reading on Paper and Scrolling Text on a Screen in Academic Learning," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
    9. Raminta Pranckutė, 2021. "Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus: The Titans of Bibliographic Information in Today’s Academic World," Publications, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-59, March.
    10. Maria José Sá & Ana Isabel Santos & Sandro Serpa & Carlos Miguel Ferreira, 2021. "Digitainability—Digital Competences Post-COVID-19 for a Sustainable Society," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Andrea Cortegiani & Andrea Manca & Manoj Lalu & David Moher, 2020. "Inclusion of predatory journals in Scopus is inflating scholars’ metrics and advancing careers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 65(1), pages 3-4, January.
    12. Juan Bartolomé & Pablo Garaizar, 2022. "Design and Validation of a Novel Tool to Assess Citizens’ Netiquette and Information and Data Literacy Using Interactive Simulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Salim Moussa, 2021. "Citation contagion: a citation analysis of selected predatory marketing journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(1), pages 485-506, January.
    14. Santiago Tejedor & Laura Cervi & Ana Pérez-Escoda & Fernanda Tusa Jumbo, 2020. "Digital Literacy and Higher Education during COVID-19 Lockdown: Spain, Italy, and Ecuador," Publications, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-17, November.
    15. György Csomós & Jenő Zsolt Farkas, 2023. "Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study o," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(1), pages 803-824, January.
    16. Emanuel Kulczycki & Marek Hołowiecki & Zehra Taşkın & Franciszek Krawczyk, 2021. "Citation patterns between impact-factor and questionable journals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(10), pages 8541-8560, October.
    17. Kyle Siler, 2020. "Demarcating spectrums of predatory publishing: Economic and institutional sources of academic legitimacy," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 71(11), pages 1386-1401, November.
    18. Julia Nitsche & Theresa Sophie Busse & Sven Kernebeck & Jan P. Ehlers, 2022. "Virtual Classrooms and Their Challenge of Interaction—An Evaluation of Chat Activities and Logs in an Online Course about Digital Medicine with Heterogeneous Participants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-10, August.
    19. Maria José Sá & Carlos Miguel Ferreira & Sandro Serpa, 2019. "(Un)professionalisation or (Re)professionalisation of the Academic in the Brave New World?," Postmodern Openings, Editura Lumen, Department of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 84-113, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:9:y:2020:i:3:p:214. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.