IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/elr111/v13y2024i1p26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

English Vocabulary Learning Strategies between High-achievers and Low-achievers

Author

Listed:
  • Daoyu Huang
  • Xiaoqing Zhang
  • Yuanyuan Guan

Abstract

This study intends to compare the vocabulary learning strategies between high-achievers and low-achievers in junior high schools, and thus to explore effective vocabulary learning strategies to provide suggestions for English vocabulary teaching and learning practice. It is found out that high-achievers apply English vocabulary learning strategies more frequently than low-achieving students do. More specifically, in terms of meta-cognitive strategies, low-achievers use more pre-planning strategies, while high-achievers apply more selective attention strategies. For cognitive strategies, both high-achievers and low-achievers tend to use repetition strategies. Achievers are better at categorizing what they have learnt than low-achievers. For affective strategies, low-achievers apply reference books strategies most frequently and neither type of students uses authentic material strategies very often. Students’ beliefs, habits and attitudes towards vocabulary learning affect the application of strategies to some extent. High-achievers are better at utilizing the environment and even creating opportunities for English communication than underachievers. In addition, high-achievers have stronger learning motivation and they are also better at setting and achieving goals than low-achievers.

Suggested Citation

  • Daoyu Huang & Xiaoqing Zhang & Yuanyuan Guan, 2024. "English Vocabulary Learning Strategies between High-achievers and Low-achievers," English Linguistics Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/download/25992/16114
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/elr/article/view/25992
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:elr111:v:13:y:2024:i:1:p:26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://elr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.