IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v8y2019i2p171.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Principles-Based Accounting Standards, Earnings Management and Price Efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Ehud Yampuler

Abstract

The issue of principles-based accounting standards has been attracting growing interest since the emergence of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as a global phenomenon, and the United States consideration of IFRS adoption. This paper studies the effect of a move towards principles-based accounting standards on price efficiency in the equity market. I assume a move towards principles-based standards requires the firm’s manager to use more of his private, though more subjective, information for financial reporting. I model the manager’s reporting decision as a trade-off between increased compensation through earnings management and a cost associated with earnings management (such as litigation, SEC enforcement, and manipulation effort). I find that the effect of a move towards principles-based accounting standards on price efficiency is non-monotonic. When standards are highly rules-based, reducing the use of rules-based standards increases price efficiency. However, at some point, this relation reverses. The optimal mix of rules and principles reflects a trade-off between two types of effects on price efficiency- predictive ability and comparability. In addition, expected earnings management is non-monotonic in the use of rules-based standards. Finally, I find that rules intensity and managerial compensation incentives act as complements, such that higher managerial compensation incentives require more rules-based standards for price efficiency to be maximized.Â

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Ehud Yampuler, 2019. "Principles-Based Accounting Standards, Earnings Management and Price Efficiency," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(2), pages 171-171, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:171
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/15258/9539
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/15258
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jfinan:v:44:y:1989:i:3:p:633-46 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Michael J. Fishman & Kathleen M. Hagerty, 1989. "Disclosure Decisions by Firms and the Competition for Price Efficiency," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 44(3), pages 633-646, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paugam, Luc, 2011. "Valorisation et reporting du goodwill : enjeux théoriques et empiriques," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/8007 edited by Casta, Jean-François.
    2. Goldman, Eitan & Martel, Jordan & Schneemeier, Jan, 2022. "A theory of financial media," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 239-258.
    3. Xu, Mingli & Yang, Wei & Huang, Zhixiong, 2021. "Do investor relations matter in the tourism industry? Evidence from public opinions in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 923-933.
    4. Langberg, Nisan & Sivaramakrishnan, K., 2008. "Voluntary disclosures and information production by analysts," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 78-100, September.
    5. Alvarez, Fernando & Barlevy, Gadi, 2021. "Mandatory disclosure and financial contagion," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Asriyan, Vladimir & Fuchs, William & Green, Brett, 2021. "Aggregation and design of information in asset markets with adverse selection," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    7. Michael Minnis & Nemit Shroff, 2017. "Why regulate private firm disclosure and auditing?," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 473-502, July.
    8. Herrera R. Edila E., 2013. "Factores que explican la extensión de revelación de activos intangibles de los bancos que cotizan en la Bolsa de Valores de Panamá," Contaduría y Administración, Accounting and Management, vol. 58(3), pages 173-202, julio-sep.
    9. Jiancheng (Duncan) Liu & Wei Shi & Cheng Zeng & Guochang Zhang, 2023. "Does Public Firms’ Mandatory IFRS Reporting Crowd Out Private Firms’ Capital Investment?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 1263-1312, September.
    10. Stephanie F. Cheng & Christine Cuny & Hao Xue, 2023. "Disclosure and Competition for Capital," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(7), pages 4312-4330, July.
    11. Mayer, Simon, 2022. "Financing breakthroughs under failure risk," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(3), pages 807-848.
    12. Itay Goldstein, 2023. "Information in Financial Markets and Its Real Effects," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 27(1), pages 1-32.
    13. Hirshleifer, David & Subrahmanyam, Avanidhar & Titman, Sheridan, 2006. "Feedback and the success of irrational investors," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(2), pages 311-338, August.
    14. Christian Leuz, 2010. "Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(3), pages 229-256.
    15. Richard Lambert & Christian Leuz & Robert E. Verrecchia, 2007. "Accounting Information, Disclosure, and the Cost of Capital," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(2), pages 385-420, May.
    16. Manso, Gustavo, 2013. "Feedback effects of credit ratings," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(2), pages 535-548.
    17. Markus Baldauf & Joshua Mollner, 2015. "High-Frequency Trading and Market Performance," Discussion Papers 15-017, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
    18. Huang, Li & Liu, Jinsong & Shi, Jing & Ying, Qianwei, 2024. "Retail investors matter: The value of corporate interactions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Ajeyo Banerjee & E. Woodrow Eckard, 2001. "Why Regulate Insider Trading? Evidence from the First Great Merger Wave (1897-1903)," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 91(5), pages 1329-1349, December.
    20. Sunil Poshakwale & John K. Courtis, 2005. "Disclosure level and cost of equity capital: evidence from the banking industry," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(7), pages 431-444.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:8:y:2019:i:2:p:171. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.