IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2024v15p247-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pragmatic foreign policy of Hungary in the shadow of the Russian-Ukrainian war

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea SCHMIDT

    (University of Pécs, Hungary)

  • Viktor GLIED

    (University of Pécs, Hungary)

Abstract

The steps of the foreign policy of the Hungarian government are considered a series of interest-driven, super-pragmatic decisions that consist of ideology-based considerations, but mainly serve pure political and economic interests to broaden the room for international manoeuvres. This study explains the driving forces of pragmatic Hungarian foreign policy thinking, especially how this idea shifted in the light of the Russian-Ukrainian war as the most overwhelming crisis for Europe. The consistent behaviour of Hungarian diplomacy and mutual distrust increased the tension between Hungary and its allies, the EU, and NATO. The analysis used the elements of critical discourse analysis to introduce and help understand the foreign policy strategy of Hungary.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea SCHMIDT & Viktor GLIED, 2024. "Pragmatic foreign policy of Hungary in the shadow of the Russian-Ukrainian war," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 15, pages 247-267, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2024:v:15:p:247-267
    DOI: https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2024-SI12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2024_15SI_SCH.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/https://doi.org/10.47743/ejes-2024-SI12?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Friedrichs, Jörg & Kratochwil, Friedrich, 2009. "On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 63(4), pages 701-731, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nelson, Ewan & Warren, Peter, 2020. "UK transport decoupling: On track for clean growth in transport?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 39-51.
    2. Helmut K. Anheier & Robert Falkner & Monika Sus, 2017. "Towards the European Union's Foreign Policy 2025 – Taking Stock of the Dahrendorf Foresight Project," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 115-125, June.
    3. Behzad MOHAMMADIAN & Corina MARINESCU, 2023. "Gamification Effectiveness In Tourism Industry: Evidence From Human Resource Process Tracing," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 17(1), pages 664-677, November.
    4. Lederer, Markus, 2011. "Practicing agrifood governance," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 756-759.
    5. Hofferberth Matthias, 2011. "The Binding Dynamics of Non-Binding Governance Arrangements. The Voluntary Principles on Security and Human Rights and the Cases of BP and Chevron," Business and Politics, De Gruyter, vol. 13(4), pages 1-32, December.
    6. Sanchez, Juan I. & Bonache, Jaime & Paz-Aparicio, Carmen & Oberty, Celia Zárraga, 2023. "Combining interpretivism and positivism in international business research: The example of the expatriate role," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(2).
    7. Raelin, Joseph A. & Robinson, Jennifer L., 2022. "Update of leadership-as-practice “practice theory”: Featuring Joe Raelin Interviewed by Jenny Robinson," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 18(5), pages 695-706.
    8. Pablo Garcés, 2022. "Pragmatic behaviour: pragmatism as a philosophy for behavioural economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 15(1), pages 1-34.
    9. Kurusu, Kaoru, 2016. "Does the Concept of Human Security Generate Additional Value? An Analysis of Japanese Stakeholder Perceptions," Working Papers 122, JICA Research Institute.
    10. Niels Gheyle, 2020. "Huddle Up! Exploring Domestic Coalition Formation Dynamics in the Differentiated Politicization of TTIP," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(1), pages 301-311.
    11. repec:hal:spmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9oeq948ubh is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Jonathan D. Caverley & Yanna Krupnikov, 2017. "Aiming at Doves," Journal of Conflict Resolution, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 61(7), pages 1482-1509, August.
    13. repec:bla:glopol:v:8:y:2017:i:s4:p:115-125 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Juliet Johnson & Daniel Mügge & Leonard Seabrooke & Cornelia Woll & Ilene Grabel & Kevin Gallagher, 2013. "The future of international political economy," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-02186506, HAL.
    15. Marlin-Bennett, Renée & Thornton, E. Nicole, 2012. "Governance within social media websites: Ruling new frontiers," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 493-501.
    16. José R Ponce, 2018. "Origin and Evolution of the Concept Stress," Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research, Biomedical Research Network+, LLC, vol. 10(5), pages 8130-8135, November.
    17. repec:spo:wpmain:info:hdl:2441/6ggbvnr6munghes9oeq948ubh is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Odell, Scott D., 2021. "Hydrosocial displacements: Sources and impacts of collaboration as a response to water conflict near three Chilean mines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    19. Jyri J. Jäntti & Benjamin Klasche, 2021. "‘Losing Leverage’ in the Neighbourhood: A Cognitive Frame Analysis of the European Union Migration Policy," International Studies, , vol. 58(3), pages 302-323, July.
    20. Jon R Lindsay, 2024. "Abducted by hackers: Using the case of Bletchley Park to construct a theory of intelligence performance that generalizes to cybersecurity," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 61(1), pages 87-102, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2024:v:15:p:247-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.