IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2017v8p197-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

BOOK REVIEW - Sieglinde Gstöhl and Simon Schunz (eds.), Theorizing the European Neighbourhood Policy, Abingdon: Routledge, 2017

Author

Listed:
  • Cristian NITOIU

    (Aston Centre for Europe, Aston University, United Kingdom)

Abstract

Since its inception at the beginning of the 2000s, the approach of the European Union (EU) towards its neighbourhood has been afforded significant attention by the academic literature. Many research projects and studies have presented significant empirical insights regarding the way the EU has developed its approach towards its southern and eastern neighbourhoods (Theuns 2017; Ademmer, Delcour, and Wolczuk 2016; Nilsson and Silander 2016; Edwards 2008; Bechev and Nicolaïdis 2010; Beauguitte, Richard, and Guérin-Pace 2015). At the same time, the success and effectiveness of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) has been debated and reviewed by official institutions, think tanks or scholars, with the EU almost always lagging behind its ambitious goals and commitments (Schumacher 2015).

Suggested Citation

  • Cristian NITOIU, 2017. "BOOK REVIEW - Sieglinde Gstöhl and Simon Schunz (eds.), Theorizing the European Neighbourhood Policy, Abingdon: Routledge, 2017," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 197-203, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2017:v:8:p:197-203
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2017_0801_NIT.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ana E. Juncos & Richard G. Whitman, 2015. "Europe as a Regional Actor: Neighbourhood Lost?," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53, pages 200-215, September.
    2. David Cadier, 2014. "Eastern Partnership vs Eurasian Union? The EU–Russia Competition in the Shared Neighbourhood and the Ukraine Crisis," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 5, pages 76-85, October.
    3. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:48:y:2010:i::p:475-500 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Katsiaryna Yakouchyk, 2016. "The Eurasian Project and Europe. Regional Discontinuities and Geopolitics," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 68(6), pages 1094-1096, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Angelos Chryssogelos, 2017. "Still Europeanised? Greek Foreign Policy During the Eurozone Crisis," GreeSE – Hellenic Observatory Papers on Greece and Southeast Europe 118, Hellenic Observatory, LSE.
    2. Yu. D. Kvashnin, 2019. "The EAEU as Perceived by the Western Scientific and Expert Community (Bibliographic Essay)," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(2).
    3. Chryssogelos, Angelos, 2017. "Still Europeanised? Greek Foreign Policy During the Eurozone Crisis," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85925, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Popescu Raluca Maria, 2020. "Russia’s Growth as a Regional Power in the Context of the Eurasian Economic Union," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 746-754, July.
    5. Juliet Johnson & Seçkin Köstem, 2016. "Frustrated Leadership: Russia's Economic Alternative to the West," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 7(2), pages 207-216, May.
    6. Cristian Incaltarau & Ilkhom Sharipov & Gabriela Carmen Pascariu & Teodor Lucian Moga, 2022. "Growth and convergence in Eastern Partnership and Central Asian countries since the dissolution of the USSR—embarking on different development paths?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 40(1), January.
    7. A. M. Libman, 2019. "Learning from the European Union? Eurasian Regionalism and the "Global Script"," Outlines of global transformations: politics, economics, law, Center for Crisis Society Studies, vol. 12(2).
    8. Thomas Gehring & Kevin Urbanski & Sebastian Oberthür, 2017. "The European Union as an Inadvertent Great Power: EU Actorness and the Ukraine Crisis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(4), pages 727-743, July.
    9. Karolina Pomorska & Gergana Noutcheva, 2017. "Europe as a Regional Actor: Waning Influence in an Unstable and Authoritarian Neighbourhood," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55, pages 165-176, September.
    10. Celbis, Mehmet Guney & Wong, Pui-hang & Guznajeva, Tatjana, 2018. "The Eurasian customs union and the economic geography of Belarus: A panel convergence approach," MERIT Working Papers 2018-029, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    11. Tobias Schumacher, 2020. "The EU and its Neighbourhood: The Politics of Muddling Through," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(S1), pages 187-201, September.
    12. Azimzhan Khitakhunov & Bulat Mukhamediyev & Richard Pomfret, 2017. "Eurasian Economic Union: present and future perspectives," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 59-77, February.
    13. Sara Norrevik, 2021. "Foreign economic policy in the European Parliament and economic interdependence with foreign powers," European Union Politics, , vol. 22(4), pages 700-720, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eastern Neighbourhood;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2017:v:8:p:197-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.