IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2016v7p111-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The EU’s rule of law promotion in post-Soviet Europe: what explains the divergence between Baltic States and EaP countries?

Author

Listed:
  • Martin MENDELSKI

    (Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne, Germany)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) and domestic “change agents” have promoted the rule of law in post-Soviet Europe with varying results. While the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania) succeeded in establishing the rule of law, Eastern Partnership (EaP) countries (Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Azerbaijan and Armenia) did not. Why did EU-driven legal, judicial and anti-corruption reforms not produce the rule of law in the latter group? I argue that divided elites (reformers) in laggard EaP countries engage in detrimental political competition that creates incentives to misuse the law, the prosecution and judicial structures as “political weapons”. The result of this power struggle is an erratic reform process which produces reform pathologies of Europeanization (e.g. legal instability and incoherence, reinforced fragmentation and politicization) that undermine the rule of law. Instead of serving as an external check on rule-of-law abusing reformers, the EU empowers reformist but unaccountable “change agents” in a partisan way, thus creating incentives for the accumulation and abuse of power, especially after regime changes. Reformers in the advanced Baltic States have avoided detrimental political competition, the fragmentation of the state and many reform pitfalls through de facto exclusion of ethnic Russians from the political and judicial system. This policy of partial exclusion allowed elites in Estonia and Latvia to build consensus, to create a unitary state, including strong, unified and independent horizontal accountability structures (e.g. judiciary, Ombudsman, Constitutional Court etc.) which in turn were able to check the executive. The argument is supported by an empirical, indicator-based analysis of the rule of law and several interviews with representatives in Brussels, Strasbourg and Chisinau.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin MENDELSKI, 2016. "The EU’s rule of law promotion in post-Soviet Europe: what explains the divergence between Baltic States and EaP countries?," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7, pages 111-144, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2016:v:7:p:111-144
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2016_0702_MEN.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:46:y:2008:i::p:365-387 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Laurent Pech, 2016. "The EU as a global rule of law promoter: the consistency and effectiveness challenges," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 7-24, March.
    3. Lili Di Puppo, 2010. "Anti-corruption interventions in Georgia," Global Crime, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 220-236, April.
    4. Roberto Belloni & Francesco Strazzari, 2014. "Corruption in post-conflict Bosnia-Herzegovina and Kosovo: a deal among friends," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(5), pages 855-871, May.
    5. Vachudova, Milada Anna, 2005. "Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199241194.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Burnell, 2008. "From Evaluating Democracy Assistance to Appraising Democracy Promotion," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 56(2), pages 414-434, June.
    2. Tanja A. Börzel & Thomas Risse, 2009. "Diffusing (Inter-) Regionalism - The EU as a Model of Regional Integration," KFG Working Papers p0007, Free University Berlin.
    3. Richard Connolly, 2012. "The Determinants of the Economic Crisis in Post-Socialist Europe," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(1), pages 35-67.
    4. Loukas Tsoukalis, 2006. "The JCMS Lecture: Managing Diversity and Change in the European Union," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(1), pages 1-15, March.
    5. Tanja A. Börzel, 2010. "The Transformative Power of Europe Reloaded - The Limits of External Europeanization," KFG Working Papers p0011, Free University Berlin.
    6. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:47:y:2009:i::p:789-809 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Joachim Becker, 2024. "Governing neo-nationalism, trade unions and industrial relations: the cases of Hungary and Poland," Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, , vol. 30(1), pages 51-65, February.
    8. Ingi Iusmen, 2015. "EU Leverage and Democratic Backsliding in Central and Eastern Europe: the Case of Romania," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(3), pages 593-608, May.
    9. Haass, Felix & Ottmann, Martin, 2017. "Profits from Peace: The Political Economy of Power-Sharing and Corruption," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 60-74.
    10. Rose, Richard, 2007. "Evaluating democratic governance: A bottom up approach to European Union enlargement," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Inequality and Social Integration SP I 2007-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Mirela Dubali Alhasani, 2016. "To What Extend the Democratic Party of Albania is Conservative? A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of This Political Party," Journal of Social Science Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 3(2), pages 160-172, July.
    12. Rachel A. Epstein & Wade Jacoby, 2014. "JCMS Special Issue 2014: Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East-West Divide? Guest Editors: Rachel A. Epstein and Wade Jacoby," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 1-16, January.
    13. Tanja Börzel & Adam Fagan, 2015. "Environmental governance in South East Europe/Western Balkans: reassessing the transformative power of Europe," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 33(5), pages 885-900, October.
    14. Rachel A. Epstein & Juliet Johnson, 2010. "Uneven Integration: Economic and Monetary Union in Central and Eastern Europe," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 1237-1260, November.
    15. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "When Europeanization Hits Limited Statehood. The Western Balkans as a Test Case for the Transformative Power of Europe," KFG Working Papers p0030, Free University Berlin.
    16. Frank Schimmelfennig & Hanno Scholtz, 2010. "Legacies and Leverage: EU Political Conditionality and Democracy Promotion in Historical Perspective," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(3), pages 443-460.
    17. Gülnur Aybet & Florian Bieber, 2011. "From Dayton to Brussels: The Impact of EU and NATO Conditionality on State Building in Bosnia & Hercegovina," Europe-Asia Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(10), pages 1911-1937.
    18. repec:bla:jcmkts:v:45:y:2007:i::p:1041-1064 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Manuela Moschella, 2007. "An International Political Economy Approach to the Neighbourhood Policy. The ENP from the Enlargement and the Mediterranean Perspectives," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 7(Summer), pages 156-180.
    20. Tanja A. Börzel, 2011. "Move Closer! New Modes of Governance and Accession to the European Union," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 1, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    21. Dogmus, Özge Can & Nielsen, Jonas Østergaard, 2020. "The on-paper hydropower boom: A case study of corruption in the hydropower sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    22. Julia Langbein, 2014. "JCMS Special Issue 2014: Eastern Enlargement Ten Years On: Transcending the East-West Divide? Guest Editors: Rachel A. Epstein and Wade Jacoby," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 157-174, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2016:v:7:p:111-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.