IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/journl/y2013v4p95-110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The socialization potential of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum

Author

Listed:
  • Hrant KOSTANYAN

    (Centre for EU Studies, Ghent University, Belgium)

  • Bruno VANDECASTEELE

    (Centre for EU Studies, Ghent University, Belgium)

Abstract

This article assesses socialization in the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, an institutionalized civil society cooperation consisting of non-governmental organizations from the European Union and the Eastern Partnership countries: Belarus, Ukraine, Moldova, Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan. The article argues that uniting the literature on socialization and on Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum adds considerably to scholarly knowledge about the role of the institutionalized civil society in the world. The analysis of the activities of the Civil Society Forum shows that the conditions for socialization are largely fulfilled. We conclude that the organisation and functioning of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum not only provides a passive framework for transmitting European values and norms, but also results in a middle degree of socialization between civil society organizations of the European Union and the Eastern Partnership countries. There is a large degree of internalization of European Union-sponsored norms and values among the participants of the Civil Society Forum: they fervently promote and defend such norms and values. The little-politicized environment in which discussions take place also allows civil society organisations to make ambitious statements, often more straightforward than political representatives (can) make.

Suggested Citation

  • Hrant KOSTANYAN & Bruno VANDECASTEELE, 2013. "The socialization potential of the Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum," Eastern Journal of European Studies, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 4, pages 95-110, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2013:v:4:p:95-110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://ejes.uaic.ro/articles/EJES2013_0402_KOS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schimmelfennig, Frank, 2005. "Strategic Calculation and International Socialization: Membership Incentives, Party Constellations, and Sustained Compliance in Central and Eastern Europe," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 827-860, October.
    2. Checkel, Jeffrey T., 2005. "International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 801-826, October.
    3. Hooghe, Liesbet, 2005. "Several Roads Lead to International Norms, but Few Via International Socialization: A Case Study of the European Commission," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 861-898, October.
    4. Juncos, Ana E.; Pomorska, Karolina, 2006. "Playing the Brussels game: Strategic socialisation in the CFSP Council Working Groups," European Integration online Papers (EIoP), European Community Studies Association Austria (ECSA-A), vol. 10, September.
    5. Beyers, Jan, 2005. "Multiple Embeddedness and Socialization in Europe: The Case of Council Officials," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 59(4), pages 899-936, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling & Will Lowe & Christian van Stolk, 2016. "Silent professionalization: EU integration and the professional socialization of public officials in Central and Eastern Europe," European Union Politics, , vol. 17(1), pages 162-183, March.
    2. Fligstein, Neil, 2007. "Who are the Europeans and how does this matter for politics?," Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, Working Paper Series qt9992h6vt, Institute of Industrial Relations, UC Berkeley.
    3. Hyo Won Lee, 2019. "Legalization and dispute settlement benefits: The case of the GATT/WTO," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 14(3), pages 479-509, September.
    4. Patrick Müller and Nicole Alecu de Flers, 2009. "Applying the Concept of Europeanization to the Study of Foreign Policy: Dimensions and Mechanisms," Working Papers of the Vienna Institute for European integration research (EIF) 5, Institute for European integration research (EIF).
    5. Adam Fagan & Indraneel Sircar, 2020. "Transformation All the Way Down? European Union Integration and the Professional Socialization of Municipal Health Officials in Serbia," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 688-705, May.
    6. Bernd Hayo & Pierre-Guillaume Méon, 2013. "Behind closed doors: Revealing the ECB’s decision rule," Post-Print CEB, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles, vol. 37, pages 135-160, October.
    7. Frank M. Häge, 2007. "Committee Decision-making in the Council of the European Union," European Union Politics, , vol. 8(3), pages 299-328, September.
    8. Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski & Mai'a K. Davis Cross & Ireneusz Pawel Karolewski, 2017. "What Type of Power has the EU Exercised in the Ukraine–Russia Crisis? A Framework of Analysis," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 3-19, January.
    9. Hoyoon Jung, 2019. "The Evolution of Social Constructivism in Political Science: Past to Present," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(1), pages 21582440198, February.
    10. Ekaterina Turkina & Kostas Kourtikakis, 2015. "Keeping up with the Neighbours: Diffusion of Norms and Practices Through Networks of Employer and Employee Organizations in the Eastern Partnership and the Mediterranean," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 1163-1185, September.
    11. Jarle Trondal & Zuzana Murdoch & Benny Geys, 2015. "Representative Bureaucracy and the Role of Expertise in Politics," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 3(1), pages 26-36.
    12. Liesbet Hooghe, 2012. "The European Commission in the 21st Century - Core Beliefs on EU Governance," KFG Working Papers p0038, Free University Berlin.
    13. Seeliger, Martin & Wagner, Ines, 2016. "Workers united? How trade union organizations at the European level form political positions on the freedom of services," MPIfG Discussion Paper 16/16, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.
    14. Onno Hoffmeister, 2006. "Inequality of Personal Income in the Enlarged EU: The Role of the Welfare States, Regional Cohesion Policies and Economic Integration," LIS Working papers 440, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    15. Ömer UÐUR, 2016. "The Europranization of national Foreign Policies: The Examples og germany and France within the Framework of Ukraine Crisis," Turkish Economic Review, KSP Journals, vol. 3(3), pages 527-536, September.
    16. Alves, Amanda M. & Brousseau, Eric & Yeung, Timothy Yu-Cheong, 2021. "The dynamics of institution building: State aids, the European commission, and the court of justice of the European Union," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 836-859.
    17. Erik Voeten, 2014. "Does participation in international organizations increase cooperation?," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 285-308, September.
    18. Amy Verdun, 2012. "Experimentalist governance in the European Union: A commentary," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 6(3), pages 385-393, September.
    19. Ana E. Juncos & Karolina Pomorska, 2007. "The Deadlock that never Happened: the Impact of Enlargement on the Common Foreign and Security Policy Council Working Groups," European Political Economy Review, European Political Economy Infrastructure Consortium, vol. 6(March), pages 4-30.
    20. Cupać, Jelena & Ebetürk, Irem, 2022. "Competitive mimicry: The socialization of antifeminist NGOs into the United Nations," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(3), pages 379-400.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Eastern Partnership; Civil Society Forum;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:journl:y:2013:v:4:p:95-110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.