IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2021v8p165-177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methods Of Interpretation In The Nature-Based Tourism - A Qualitative Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Maria TĂTĂRUSANU

    (Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași)

Abstract

Interpretation of cultural and natural heritage is a current direction of research in the sector of tourism, derived from the present-day broader concerns regarding the identification of appropriate ways to contribute to the objectives of developing a sustainable tourism that uses more rationally the cultural and natural resources that it is based on and takes into account the needs and interests of all stakeholders involved in its development. The methods of interpretation used by specialists are either personal or non-personal and concern the effective ways of performing it. The present paper analyzes, through a qualitative approach, the main methods of interpreting the natural heritage, reflected in the literature. It is noted that managers use personal and non-personal interpretation methods adapted to the visited site, the effective involvement of tourists and staff being essential in achieving the objectives related to visitor satisfaction, their attitude and behavior towards the impacts generated by tourism. At its turn, the use of new technologies in interpretation is both a concern and a way to achieve these goals.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria TĂTĂRUSANU, 2021. "Methods Of Interpretation In The Nature-Based Tourism - A Qualitative Survey," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 8, pages 165-177, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2021:v:8:p:165-177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eurint.uaic.ro/proceedings/articles/EURINT2021_TAT.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conrado Carrascosa-López & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & José Mondéjar-Jiménez & Wilmer Carvache-Franco, 2021. "Understanding Motivations and Segmentation in Ecotourism Destinations. Application to Natural Parks in Spanish Mediterranean Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Jacobs, Maarten H. & Harms, Michel, 2014. "Influence of interpretation on conservation intentions of whale tourists," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 123-131.
    3. Healy, Noel & van Riper, Carena J. & Boyd, Stephen W., 2016. "Low versus high intensity approaches to interpretive tourism planning: The case of the Cliffs of Moher, Ireland," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 574-583.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Filby, Nicole E. & Stockin, Karen A. & Scarpaci, Carol, 2015. "Social science as a vehicle to improve dolphin-swim tour operation compliance?," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 40-47.
    2. Sai-Leung Ng & Ming-Chien Hsu, 2024. "Motivation-Based Segmentation of Hiking Tourists in Taiwan," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-18, October.
    3. Weaver, David B. & Lawton, Laura J., 2017. "A new visitation paradigm for protected areas," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 140-146.
    4. Cook, Taylor C. & James, Kira & Bearzi, Maddalena, 2015. "Angler perceptions of California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) depredation and marine policy in Southern California," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 573-583.
    5. Marek Nowacki, 2021. "Heritage Interpretation and Sustainable Development: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Francesca De Canio & Elisa Martinelli & Margherita Peruzzini & Sara Cavallaro, 2022. "Experiencing a Food Production Site Using Wearable Devices: The Indirect Impact of Immersion and Presence in VR Tours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Arowosafe Folusade & Oni Festus & Tunde-Ajayi Olalekan, 2023. "Effectiveness of Interpretative Signs on Visitors’ Behaviour and Satisfaction at Lekki Conservation Center, Lagos State, Nigeria," Czech Journal of Tourism, Sciendo, vol. 12(1-2), pages 50-65, December.
    8. Sabine Panzer-Krause, 2022. "Rural Tourism in and after the COVID-19 Era: “Revenge Travel” or Chance for a Degrowth-Oriented Restart? Cases from Ireland and Germany," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & Ana Gabriela Víquez-Paniagua & Orly Carvache-Franco & Allan Pérez-Orozco, 2021. "The Role of Motivations in the Segmentation of Ecotourism Destinations: A Study from Costa Rica," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Hayati Ibrahim & Manohar Mariapan & Evelyn Lim Ai Lin & Sheena Bidin, 2021. "Wildlife Conservation through Economically Responsible Ecotourist: The Mediator Roles of Attitude between Anticipated Emotion and Intention to Stay in Local Homestays," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-16, August.
    11. José María López-Sanz & Azucena Penelas-Leguía & Pablo Gutiérrez-Rodríguez & Pedro Cuesta-Valiño, 2021. "Sustainable Development and Rural Tourism in Depopulated Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Carlie S. Wiener & Genevieve Manset & Judith D. Lemus, 2016. "Ocean use in Hawaii as a predictor of marine conservation interests, beliefs, and willingness to participate: an exploratory study," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 6(4), pages 712-723, December.
    13. Kyungsik Kim & Yongdi Wang & Jianmin Shi & Wangda Guo & Zixiang Zhou & Zhaoyong Liu, 2023. "Structural Relationship between Ecotourism Motivation, Satisfaction, Place Attachment, and Environmentally Responsible Behavior Intention in Nature-Based Camping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Georgette Leah Burns & Laufey Haraldsdóttir & Guðrún Þóra Gunnarsdóttir, 2021. "Interpretation in Ásbyrgi: Communicating with National Park Visitors in Iceland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Podoshen, Jeffrey S. & Yan, Grace & Andrzejewski, Susan A. & Wallin, Jason & Venkatesh, Vivek, 2018. "Dark tourism, abjection and blood: A festival context," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 346-356.
    16. Marcelino Sánchez-Rivero & Juan de la Cruz Sánchez-Domínguez & Mª Cristina Rodríguez-Rangel, 2022. "Estimating the Probability of Visiting a Protected Natural Space and Its Conditioning Factors: The Case of the Monfragüe Biosphere Reserve (Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-19, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2021:v:8:p:165-177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.