IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jes/eurint/y2016v3p96-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

De Facto States In The European Neighbourhood: Between Russian Domination And European (Dis)Engagement. The Case Of Abkhazia

Author

Listed:
  • Sebastian RELITZ

    (Institute for East and Southeast European Studies, Germany)

Abstract

With the ratification of the Association Agreements with Georgia and Moldova in 2014, the European Union (EU) has been confronted in its integration policies with several post-Soviet de facto states (Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Transnistria). The paper clarifies the concept of the de facto state and discusses how non-recognition affects the sustainability and international position of these entities. It will be argued, that de facto states can be considered as a permanent part of the international system rather than just temporal anomalies and that they confront the EU with a serious action dilemma. Based on the Abkhazian case study, I will analyse the strategies and instruments the EU is implementing to achieve its policy objectives, identify key obstacles such as the growing Russian presence in the region and highlight the practical consequences of the action dilemma.

Suggested Citation

  • Sebastian RELITZ, 2016. "De Facto States In The European Neighbourhood: Between Russian Domination And European (Dis)Engagement. The Case Of Abkhazia," EURINT, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 3, pages 96-113.
    • Handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2016:v:3:p:96-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://cse.uaic.ro/eurint/proceedings/index_htm_files/EURINT%202016_REL.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pål Kolstø, 2006. "The Sustainability and Future of Unrecognized Quasi-States," Journal of Peace Research, Peace Research Institute Oslo, vol. 43(6), pages 723-740, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eleanor Knott, 2015. "What Does it Mean to Be a Kin Majority? Analyzing Romanian Identity in Moldova and Russian Identity in Crimea from Below," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 96(3), pages 830-859, September.
    2. Masayuki Kudamatsu, 2019. "Observing Economic Growth in Unrecognized States with Nighttime Light," OSIPP Discussion Paper 19E002, Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
    3. Zsuzsa Csergő & Philippe Roseberry & Stefan Wolff, 2017. "Institutional Outcomes of Territorial Contestation: Lessons from Post-Communist Europe, 1989–2012," Publius: The Journal of Federalism, CSF Associates Inc., vol. 47(4), pages 491-521.
    4. Kopeček Vincenc & Hoch Tomáš & Baar Vladimír, 2016. "De Facto States and Democracy: The Case of Abkhazia," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 32(32), pages 85-104, June.
    5. Michal Smetana & Jan Ludvík, 2019. "Between war and peace: a dynamic reconceptualization of “frozen conflicts”," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, March.
    6. Magdalena Dembińska & Frédéric Mérand, 2019. "The role of international brokers in frozen conflicts: the case of transnistria," Asia Europe Journal, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 15-30, March.
    7. Meydan, Vildan, 2018. "A Paradox of international (non)recognition: the relationship between de facto states and patron states," MPRA Paper 91050, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jes:eurint:y:2016:v:3:p:96-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Alupului Ciprian (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csjesro.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.