IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jda/journl/vol.51year2017issue2pp85-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Labor Productivity And Social Policy In Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Rene Caceres
  • Susan Caceres

    (The World Bank, USA)

Abstract

Recent research has shown that labor productivity has fallen since 1975 in Latin American countries, a phenomenon that has taken place after countries undertook ambitious economic reforms and when the macro-economy has been stable. Decreasing productivity has adverse repercussions on competitiveness, export growth, salaries and income distribution. There is no consensus on the reasons behind the deterioration in productivity. For this reason, this paper investigates the determinants of labor productivity in a sample of six Latin American countries: Costa Rica, Ecuador, Bolivia, Colombia, Dominican Republic and Jamaica. The analysis rests on the estimation of a Var model with the variables: investment rate, human capital, public consumption, labor productivity, and social variables- self and quality employment, part time employment, and income distribution. The specific contributions of the paper are the inclusion of social variables in the Var estimations and the breakdown of labor market variables by gender. The Var was estimated with 1990-2012 data from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators. The impulse response functions indicate that labor productivity increases with increasing physical and human capital, with government consumption, quality jobs, and equitable income distribution. The responses are more pronounced for women than for men. An interesting result is that the response of the percentage of national income that is invested by the richest decile of the population has a positive association with the respective country’s average education attainment, indicating that human capital induces private investment. Labor productivity is not dependent on purely economic variables, such as physical capital and technology, but depends on equitable access to social services. When all population groups have access to social services, more individuals will have better skills and better jobs in the official economy, which contributes to increasing labor productivity. Achieving this requires a solid fiscal situation. In other words, increasing labor productivity demands adequate tax revenues to attend to social variables to promote a regimen of equality of opportunity.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Rene Caceres & Susan Caceres, 2017. "Labor Productivity And Social Policy In Latin America," Journal of Developing Areas, Tennessee State University, College of Business, vol. 51(2), pages 85-104, April-Jun.
  • Handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue2:pp:85-104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/657930
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Luis Rene Caceres, 2024. "Corruption in Mexico and Central America," International Journal of Economics and Finance, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(6), pages 102-102, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Human Capital; Equality of Opportunities; Shadow Economy; Income Distribution; Self-Employment;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • J16 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Economics of Gender; Non-labor Discrimination
    • J18 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Public Policy
    • J64 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Mobility, Unemployment, Vacancies, and Immigrant Workers - - - Unemployment: Models, Duration, Incidence, and Job Search
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • I25 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Education and Economic Development

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jda:journl:vol.51:year:2017:issue2:pp:85-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Abu N.M. Wahid (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cbtnsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.